banner

September 2008
Volume 12, Number 2

Contents  |   TESL-EJ Top

Teacher Language in ESL Face-To-Face and Written Electronic Discussions

Michael Fitze
Dubai Women’s College, Dubai
<michaelfitzehotmail.com>

Hedy M. McGarrell
Brock University, Ontario, Canada
<jhmcgarreBrockU.CA>

Abstract

This repeated-measures, counter-balanced study reports on a comparison of quantity and quality of one teacher’s language in face-to-face (FTF) and written electronic (WE) discussions with advanced English as a Subsequent Language (ESL) students. Transcripts from the two types of discussions were compared for complexity of teacher input and the language functions this input served during the discussions. Analyses show that the teacher contributed more words, more t-units, and longer t-units to the FTF discussions, and his contributions were longer, consisting of more t-units. The teacher’s input to the FTF discussions, unlike the WE discussion, created inequality in participation in the whole group. In the WE setting, teacher language encouraged interaction with individual students, while in the FTF setting, it tended to promote interaction with the whole group. Categorization and analysis of the language functions used showed statistically significant differences.

Keywords: EFL, ESL, discussion, discourse analysis, online, WebCT

Full Article (HTML)  |  Full Article (PDF)


© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor's Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.