• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms

June 2012 – Volume 16, Number 1

Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms:
Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context

Author: Hossein Nassaji & Sandra Fotos (2011)  
Publisher: New York: Taylor & Francis
Pages ISBN Price
167 pages 978-0-415-80205-5 $42.95 USD

The role of grammar teaching has been a contentious issue in ESL and foreign language pedagogies (henceforth, language teaching) for decades. In this book, Nassaji and Fotos not only succeeded in affirming the importance of grammar instruction in language teaching but also in informing practitioners how grammar could be best taught in actual classrooms based on theoretical and empirical evidence. Each chapter introduces the theoretical background of a particular approach, theory, or construct of second language acquisition (SLA) substantiated by empirical evidence. Then, appropriate grammar teaching examples are illustrated and questions for reflection and additional useful resources are listed. As the authors suggest, the book is recommended for both researchers/graduate students who are interested in SLA theories and practitioners who are interested in learning sound research-based grammar pedagogies. Inasmuch as the book is written for both types of readers, however, it may be more suitable for SLA researchers/graduate students who are interested in SLA theories and their ramifications in grammar teaching. Without an SLA background, some portions of the chapters may not be easily accessible to practitioners unfortunately.

Chapter 1 describes how views toward grammar teaching have changed over decades. As many of the readers are probably familiar with a constant shift in language teaching paradigms, the role of grammar teaching has accordingly shifted like a pendulum. This chapter thus sets the stage for recent increased attention to grammar teaching in current language teaching communities.

The rest of the book is divided into three parts: input-based options with a focus on grammar, interaction- and output-based options with a focus on grammar, and instructional contexts and focus on grammar. The first part is further divided into three chapters: focus on grammar through processing instruction, textual enhancement, and through discourse. These chapters mainly discuss the importance of input in grammar learning. The first chapter on processing instruction is based on VanPatten’s (e.g., 2002, 2007) input processing model of SLA. According to this model, grammar can be successfully taught by processing input in order to connect form and meaning without necessarily enforcing production drills. The second chapter also emphasizes that grammar can be taught by input if the target forms are externally manipulated so that saliency of the target forms is heightened and learners are likely to notice and process them. The third chapter describes how grammar should be taught in meaningful discourse so that learners can understand how grammar is used in actual contexts. What is particularly notable and enlightening in this section is the inclusion of the chapter on discourse. Since grammar has often been analyzed at a sentential level, grammar teaching has often neglected the importance of larger linguistic contexts of discourse. The authors convincingly advocate that grammar should be learned in a larger context at the discourse level. Furthermore, situating grammar at the discourse level is a timely approach in current SLA research as systemic functional grammar has gained popularity in recent years.

The theme of the second part of the book is interaction- and output-based grammar teaching. This part is further divided into three chapters: focus on grammar through interactional feedback, focus on grammar through structured grammar-focused tasks, and focus on grammar through collaborative output tasks. The authors draw theories and constructs from the field of SLA such as the interaction hypothesis, recasts, task-based approach, output hypothesis, sociocultural perspective, and languaging to name a few and provide empirical findings for each. From reading this section, the reader will be able to perceive what the authors’ stance on grammar teaching is with respect to language teaching. In addition to the role of input as discussed in the first section of the book, the authors stress the importance of learner output and corrective feedback in order to elevate learners’ grammatical competency. Even explicit teaching of grammar (in learners’ L1 or L2) before and/or after meaning-based communicative activities is helpful. Throughout the book, their view of grammar teaching, that is, the importance of meaning-based communicative activities in addition to implicit/explicit grammar teaching, production activities, and corrective feedback, is reiterated. What is notable in this section is the inclusion of the recent pedagogical method of languaging proposed by Swain, Lapkin, Knouzi, Suzuki, and Brooks (2009). Languaging such as discussion or self-reflection in the L1 about the L2 is said to lead to acquisition of target forms by promoting attention to them, thus enhancing processing. The inclusion of languaging in this book, a recent model of SLA, demonstrates the authors’ up-to-date knowledge of SLA which is refreshing since it keeps practitioners abreast of the one of the most current research-based grammar pedagogy, something that is lacking in previous grammar resource books.

The last part of the book treats instructional contexts and focus on grammar which consists of a single chapter entitled “The Role of Context in Focus on Grammar.” Mainly, the chapter discusses the differences between ESL and EFL contexts and how these contextual differences affect the best way of teaching grammar (e.g., native vs. non-native teachers, amount of target language exposure outside the classroom, target language proficiency levels, goals of learning the target language, etc.). The authors extensively discuss how EFL contexts differ from ESL contexts; thus, this chapter provides an abundance of useful information for prospective English teachers abroad.

Overall, the book successfully connected theories/empirical findings of SLA with sound research-based grammar pedagogies. However, as an informed reader, I felt a lack of additional references in the book. First, where the paradigm of historical shifts in language teaching is discussed in Chapter 1, the author lists Richards and Rogers (1986) under useful resources. The updated second edition which was published in 2001 should be listed instead. Second, the authors extensively discuss and compare the different cognitive models of attention proposed by Schmidt (2001) and Tomlin and Villa (1994), but they only listed Schmidt (2001) under useful resources. Although Schmidt’s (2001) model is more widely accepted by SLA researchers, it would be fair to list Tomlin and Villa’s (1994) article along with Schmidt’s (2001) book chapter since they are equally contrasted in Chapter 3. Third, where the age of learners in ESL and EFL contexts is discussed in Chapter 8, the authors do not include significantly important works such as Larsen-Hall (2008) and Muñoz (2006). These works provide essential findings regarding learners’ starting age (a.k.a. age of acquisition) in EFL contexts. In my opinion, these studies are critical in discussing age of learners and learning contexts, especially in ESL and EFL contexts. Lastly, the title of the book may be somewhat misleading. Most of the empirical findings and grammar teaching examples are based on the English language. Since the book is entitled Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms, it would be more appropriate to include examples from other languages.

With some shortcomings, this book is highly recommended to both SLA researchers and practitioners. The book covers important concepts of SLA overall and nicely tie them to appropriate and useful grammar pedagogies.

References

Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24, 35-63.

Muñoz, C. (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: Students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 93, 5-29.

Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-202.

VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.

VanPatten, B. (2007). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reviewed by
Shogo Sakurai
School of Languages and Cultures, Purdue University
<ssakuraiatmarkpurdue.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.