• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Google Forms as a CALL Resource for English Language Teachers

November 2013 – Volume 17, Number 3

Title Google Forms
URL http://drive.google.com
Type of Product Form Creator
Registration Required
Price Free
Owner Google, Inc.
Terms of Service http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms/
Help Center https://support.google.com/drive/?hl=en

Introduction

Classroom assessments serve both the interests of the teacher and the students. To be effective, teachers need to ground their course design, development, and implementation decisions in the knowledge and beliefs they have of themselves and their students (Cheng, Rogers, & Hu, 2004). Only with a clear understanding of their students’ needs, interests, attitudes, learning styles, and abilities can educators tailor lessons to match their students. Likewise, to be successful, students need the feedback from assessments to gauge where they are in relation to the course objectives and to outline a path to close the gap (Chappuis & Stiggins, 2002). Students need a clear map to orient themselves within the learning process.

Ongoing assessments meet both teachers’ and students’ needs. They provide students with the opportunity to express their changing needs, assess their mastery of new material, reorient themselves towards meeting course objectives, and experience success while teachers are provided with the necessary insight to continuously reassess their beliefs, reflect on their approach to teaching and the effectiveness of course content, and tailor corrective instruction (Guskey, 2003).

In this article, I will provide an overview of Google Forms, an online form generator, and highlight ways in which this service can simplify and enhance ongoing classroom assessments.

An Overview of Google Forms

Google Forms, released in 2008 (Bonventre & Lee, 2008), is an online form generator offered within Google Drive which allows teachers to create, distribute, record, and analyze custom forms online. With this service, teachers can easily create custom assessments for their courses on an ongoing basis, distribute form links to students, and automatically record and analyze their responses.

A Guide to Google Forms

Signing up for a Google Account

Access to Google Forms is restricted to users who have an active Google Account. After clicking on the red ‘SIGN UP” button and filling out the online form, users can sign in using their newly created Gmail email address and password (see Figure 1).


Figure 1. Signing in

Google Drive

Once signed in, users are greeted by their Google Drive page (see Figure 2), which displays all the files they have created or uploaded to Google Drive. Files can be sorted by such factors as owner, last modified, last opened, last edited, and title.


Figure 2. Viewing the Google Drive folder

Google Forms

To create a new form, teachers can click on the red button “Create” (see Figure 2) and select the file type “Form.” A window will appear allowing the user to choose a title and theme for the form. Users are then able to create their first item (see Figure 3). In addition to specifying the “Question Title” and “Help Text,” users can choose from a variety of question types such as short and long text, multiple choice, list, checkbox, scale, and grid. These options provide teachers with the ability to create a variety of assessments. One of the most common classroom assessments is a questionnaire that uses a Likert scale allowing students to express the intensity of their feelings and beliefs.


Figure 3. Forming a question

Once an item is created, users can edit, duplicate, delete, or rearrange the order of existing items. Users can also click on “Add Item” to add an additional question, a section header, page break, or image (see Figure 4).


Figure 4. Adding items

After adding all the items and finalizing the layout, teachers are then given three options to choose from before posting their assessment online: Teachers can allow their students to submit multiple responses, edit their responses, and/or view the results which have been automatically analyzed for all the students who have taken the assessment (see Figure 5).


Figure 5. Posting options

Once the teacher clicks on “Send Form,” a link to the assessment is provided. The link can be embedded into a course webpage; shared via Google+, Facebook, or Twitter; or sent via email (see Figure 6).


Figure 6. Sending the Form


Figure 7. The Online Assessment Form

If the teacher has provided the option, students can then view a summary of the results (see Figure 8).


Figure 8. A Summary of the Results

Teachers can log into their Google Drive accounts, open an assessment form, and choose from a variety of options for handling the responses (see Figure 9). At any time, the teacher can stop accepting responses, delete all responses, view an automatically generated spreadsheet of the responses, or view a graphical summary of the responses.


Figure 9. Handling the Responses

Conclusion

Google Forms is well worth the minimal investment of time that is necessary to integrate it as a CALL resource in language learning classrooms. Google Forms is a simple and efficient online form generating service that provides teachers with the opportunity to assess their students on an ongoing basis. Using a variety of question types – from short answer, multiple choice, lists, and scales – forms can be easily generated, posted, and analyzed online to monitor such factors as the needs and interests of students; their perception of the teaching methods, materials, and instructor; their comprehension of course material; their beliefs and attitudes related to learning a foreign language; and their approach to learning a foreign language.

Overall, Google Forms is a powerful CALL resource. With ongoing classroom assessments, students are empowered to share their voice throughout the course and teachers are able to adapt and update their course design, development, and implementation decisions using current information from their students as the course unfolds and customize future lessons to match the changing needs of their students.

References

Bonventre, A. & Lee, M. (2008, February 7). Stop sharing spreadsheets, start collecting information. [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://googledrive.blogspot.com

Chappuis, S. & Stiggins, R. (2002). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 40-43. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://cusd.capousd.org/edusupport/Articles/Classroom%20Assessment.pdf

Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3), 360-389.

Guskey, T. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 6-11.

About the Reviewer

Brian E. Hutchinson <bhutchinson.gju.edugmail.com> is an Assistant Professor and Coordinator of Instructional Technology and Online Learning at Gyeongju University, South Korea. He holds a Master’s degree in TESOL from Azusa Pacific University. His research interests include computer assisted language learning, narrative writing, course assessments, and affective factors in second language acquisition.

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.