• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Creating native-like but comprehensible listening texts for EFL learners using NaturalReader

May 2014 – Volume 18, Number 1

Title NaturalReader, version 12
URL http://www.naturalreaders.com/
Type of product Text-to-speech synthesis software
Platform Mac, Windows
Supplementary software MS Office add-in
Price Standard (online text-to-speech with limited features)—free
Personal (allows saving speech output as audio files)—US$69.50
Professional (allows conversation control)—US$129.50
Ultimate (includes optical character recognition, or OCR)—US$199.50

Introduction

Native English speakers are often thought to bring benefits to English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms. The native speaker is often called upon to answer vocabulary and pronunciation issues from non-native speakers (Medgyes, 1994). Within this perspective, the native speaker is believed to promote the best model for language users (see Carless, 2006; Lasagabaster & Sierra, 2002) and may encourage extrinsic motivation for EFL learners (Carless, 2006; Harmer, 2007), particularly in listening sessions. However, many EFL learners encounter difficulty in comprehending the speech of native speakers. Speech rate is believed to be one of the factors leading to such problems (see Griffiths, 1991; Hirai, 1999).

Text-to-speech (TTS) technologies, which allow users to “make the computer talk” by transforming text input into speech, offer one way to control the speed of the input learners receive (Handley, 2009, p. 906). Although speech synthesis was originally developed for people with visual impairments (Kilickaya, 2006), some teachers have begun to adopt TTS technology in foreign language classrooms. Handley (2009) states that integration of TTS within the computer-assisted language learning (CALL) environment may involve three different roles: reading machine, pronunciation model, and dialogue partner. In reference to these roles, TTS technology offers increased opportunities for EFL learners to access the target language with a native-like, but accessible model.

NaturalReader, originally developed by NaturalSoft Ltd in Canada, is TTS synthesis software that promotes natural voice conversion from text input. With supplementary add-in and floating bar features, the software is not only able to carry out text-to-speech conversion from MS office documents, PDFs, webpages, and email, but also to convert these texts into audio files in MP3 or WAV formats (NaturalReader, 2014). The advanced version 12 of this software now has made optical character recognition (OCR) possible, and this makes the number and types of texts available for TTS conversion even greater.

This article describes the basic operational functionality and features of NaturalReader as a text-to-speech synthesis system. It will also discuss some ways that NaturalReader may be used to facilitate the provision of native-like, but comprehensible input to EFL learners.

Basic operation

In order to use NaturalReader, the software requires installation onto PCs or laptops. Although a free online version of this software is available, it lacks many useful features, such as the ability to convert text input into saveable audio files. Once the software is installed and started up, a simple editing screen appears (see Figure 1).


Figure 1. Editing screen from NaturalReader

 

The operation of NaturalReader is easy. Users may input text by typing (or copying-and-pasting) or by retrieving it from common file types such as .docx and .pdf. When the text is ready, users simply click the play button, and the system automatically reads it aloud. On the screen, blue and yellow colours highlight the spoken text. This highlighting facilitates EFL learners’ ability to match the written words with their pronunciation.

Features

NaturalReader provides excellent features for its users. Users can choose from among a number of natural sounding voices for the speech synthesis. Additionally, users may change the speech rate of each voice to their preference (see Figure 2).


Figure 2. Choosing from the natural sounding voices

 

The add-in feature in MS Word is allows users to convert texts into speech effortlessly (see Figure 3).


Figure 3. MS Word Add-Ins

 

The floating bar makes it possible to use the software in multiple windows so that users can have text read aloud from web pages and emails (see Figure 4). To do so, users are only required to highlight the text they want to convert into speech.


Figure 4. NaturalReader floating bar

 

In addition, NaturalReader allows its users to improve the system by changing or adding new abbreviations from the default settings. Unfortunately, phonetic symbols which are often used in learning pronunciation are not available in this editing feature.


Figure 5. Changing or adding the pronunciation of abbreviations

 

In reference to preparing EFL language teaching and learning materials, the conversation control feature allows users to add more speakers to a single text. This control can help users create more interesting and realistic simulations of communication environments (see Figure 6).


Figure 6. Conversation control

 

Finally, the feature “Convert to audio file” allows users to save speech output as an audio file (MP3 and WAV formats). Saving the files into a local drive allows users to access the materials from portable devices such as mobile phones, tablets, or iPods.


Figure 7. Conversion to audio file

 

Evaluation

The voice quality of the NaturalReader software is cutting edge. The voice is very clear and plays without any background noise due to the maximum sampling rate of 148kHz available in the software. However, although the prosodic features of the software’s voices are generally similar to natural sounding speech, rough transitions between words can occur at times.

Overall, the quality of NaturalReader is excellent, and it is a powerful application for teachers or EFL material developers who want to provide native-like but controlled listening materials for their learners. The 14 speakers that are available from two countries (the USA and UK) also allow EFL learners to access American English and British English pronunciations of texts.

Conclusion

I have personally been using TTS software for over two years. I find this software useful, not only in providing native-like materials for EFL learners, but also for providing English listening materials that match the English school syllabus and the language proficiency levels of my students. Finally, some functions of NaturalReader might also be used to aid in the development of listening comprehension tests.

References

Carless, D. (2006). Collaborative EFL teaching in primary schools. ELT Journal, 60(4), 328-335.

Griffiths, R. (1991). Pausological research in an L2 context: A rationale, and review of selected studies. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 345-364.

Handley, Z. (2009). Is text-to-speech synthesis ready for use in computer-assisted language learning? Speech Communication, 51(10), 906-919.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Hirai, A. (1999). The relationship between listening and reading rates of Japanese EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 367-384.

Kilickaya, F. (2006). ‘Text-to-speech technology’: What does it offer to foreign language learners? CALL-EJ, 7(3).

Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2002). University students’ perceptions of native and non-native speaker teachers of English. Language Awareness, 11(2), 132-142.

Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. London: Macmillan.

Naturalreader. (2014). What is Naturalreader? Retrieved 18 February, 2014, from http://www.naturalreaders.com/

Acknowledgement:

Some screenshot figures in this review (Figure 3, Figure 5, Figure 6, and Figure 7) were retrieved from the original website http://www.naturalreaders.com/pc_nr12.php#ocr on February 18, 2014.

About the Reviewer

Herri Mulyono <hmulyonouhamka.ac.id> is a member of the teaching staff at the University of Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA (UHAMKA) Jakarta, Indonesia. He is now pursuing his PhD in the Department of Education at the University of York, UK, investigating the use of technology in secondary EFL education in Indonesia. His research interests include computer-enhanced collaborative writing, computer-assisted language testing, and writing instruction in secondary schools.

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.