• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Web-based Vocabulary Learning with Quizlet

August 2015 – Volume 19, Number 2

Title Quizlet
Developer Quizlet LLC
Contact Information http://quizlet.com
Quizlet LLC, P.O. Box 77164, San Francisco, CA 94107
info@quizlet.com +1 (510) 495-6550
Type of Product Web-based flashcard program
Platform Web-based online platform
Available mobile apps for iOS 6.0 or later and Android 2.2 and up
Price Free to set up a basic account or use existing flashcard sets
US$15 a year for Quizlet Plus subscription with extra features for students
US$25 a year for teacher subscription with additional tools for using Quizlet in the classroom
Help Center http://quizlet.com/help

Introduction

Using flashcards is a time-honored, effective, and efficient vocabulary learning strategy (Nation, 2001). The advent of information and communication technology (ICT) over the past few decades has enabled EFL learners to maximize vocabulary learning through the use of web-based flashcard programs. The benefits of web-based flashcard programs may even outweigh those of paper-based ones. For instance, not only can web-based flashcard programs help increase students’ vocabulary size, they can also track students’ learning progress over time, promote motivation by strategically introducing new words, present vocabulary using multimedia, and allow learners to study at any time in any location with an internet connection (Allum, 2004; Altiner, 2011; Hulstijn, 2001; McLean, Hogg, & Rush, 2013; Nakata, 2011).

Because of the benefits of web-based flashcard programs for second or foreign language vocabulary learning, their use has become a popular learning strategy employed by a large number of teachers and students throughout the world (Nakata, 2013). This article will provide an overview of Quizlet, a web-based flashcard program, and address several of its benefits in enabling learners to study second or foreign language vocabulary in a paired-associate format.

An Overview of Quizlet

Quizlet is a website that allows users to make and study flashcard sets using a variety of game-like learning tools. Quizlet is one of the most widely used flashcard websites and has more than one million registered users and eighty million visitors, and is a repository for over thirty million user-generated study sets (Quizlet, 2014). Currently, available study sets are complimentary and accessible to anyone without registering for an account. However, users who want to create their own sets of flashcards must sign up for an account. Students who would like to take advantage of extra features such as image uploading, voice recording, and ad-free functioning can upgrade their account by paying US$15 a year for a Quizlet Plus subscription. Similarly, it costs US$25 a year for a teacher subscription with additional tools for using Quizlet in the classroom. Figure 1 illustrates the homepage of Quizlet.


Figure 1. Quizlet homepage

As mentioned earlier, users can find and use existing flashcards without signing in by entering a key search term in the search box as shown in Figure 2.


Figure 2. The search box for finding existing flashcards

However, since there are not flashcard sets for all conceivable topics or area of interest, users may wish to create study sets by registering for an account which is free of charge and easy. Users can access http://quizlet.com/help for detailed instructions on how to create new flashcard sets.

As soon as users have made, or found a set for study, they move on to six different leaning modes, namely Flashcards, Learn, Speller, Test, Scatter, and Space Race as illustrated in Figure 3.


Figure 3. Different learning modes

Flashcards: In this mode (shown in Figure 4), users start learning terms and their definitions by clicking to “flip” to see both sides of the card. If audio has been recorded, users can also listen to these terms. The audio function can be switched on and off in the sidebar, and playback can be slowed down by clicking on the Advanced settings link. This learning mode promotes not only learners’ productive, but also their receptive vocabulary knowledge (Nation, 2008).


Figure 4. Flashcard mode

Learn: This mode (shown in Figure 5) quizzes users on the flashcards they have studied by providing a definition or prompt to which they reply by typing in the corresponding term. It tracks what learners know and what they do not and retests them on their mistakes. This study mode aims to promote productive knowledge of vocabulary and spelling.


Figure 5. Learn mode

Speller: In this mode (shown in Figure 6), users listen to a term or definition and then type in the correct answer. If an incorrect response is entered, the program indicates which letters users have missed so they can try again. This mode is perfect for vocabulary revision, pronunciation, and spelling.


Figure 6. Speller mode

Test: This mode automatically generates a random quiz from a flashcard set using four types of questions: writing, matching, multiple choice, and true/false (see Figure 7). Users click “Check Answers” at the bottom of the page to see their scores in the upper right hand corner of the page. This mode is useful as an informal assessment in the classroom.


Figure 7. Test mode

Scatter: In this mode (shown in Figure 8), users race against the clock to drag and drop terms and definitions to the correct corresponding location. This is a fun review game which could be done in class with students working individually, in pairs, or in small groups.


Figure 8. Scatter mode

Space Race: In this mode, users type in the correct term in accordance with the definition scrolling from the left to the right of the screen before it disappears, as can be seen in Figure 9. This mode enables learners to practice recognition/recall and production/spelling as well as typing skills.


Figure 9. Space race mode

Evaluation of Quizlet “quizlet.com”

In order to evaluate web-based flashcard programs, Nakata (2011) put forward a set of criteria which are used below to evaluate Quizlet.

  1. Flashcard creation. Quizlet provides learners with not only existing or ready-made flashcards but also the ability to create their own flashcards. The former function enables them to study available sets of new words in a time-saving manner, and the latter empowers, or gives them responsibility to create their own flashcard sets.
  2. Multilingual support. Several research studies reveal that L1 translations foster vocabulary learning (Nakata, 2013) by making vocabulary accessible to low proficiency learners who are not ready for L2 definitions. Quizlet allows users to make target items and their translations in any language.
  3. Multi-word units. Quizlet lets learners create not only single-word items but multi-word units as well. Such multi-word items can be acquired effectively by using this web-based flashcard program.
  4. Types of information. In addition to new word meanings, visual and audio information can be added to flashcards for the facilitation of vocabulary learning. Quizlet does have these features. However, in order to make use of image or audio uploading, users have to pay US$15 per year.
  5. Presentation and retrieval modes. An ideal web-based flashcard encompasses two modes: presentation practice, which familiarizes learners with target vocabulary, and retrieval practice. Quizlet allows for both of these modes and this should enhance retention of vocabulary.
  6. Retrieval effort. Retrieval effort refers to the arrangement of vocabulary exercises in order of increasing difficulty. It is hypothesized that successful vocabulary learning will be enhanced if exercises are designed to increase retrieval effort gradually. There is, however, no such function built into Quizlet.
  7. Generative use. Quizlet is not designed to support generative use such as using target words in different senses, or by using different aspects of word knowledge in a systematic way.
  8. Block size. Block size is defined as how many flashcards can be studied in one learning session. Nakata (2011) states, “The larger the intervals between study opportunities for a given item, the better the retention will be” (p.13). Adjusting block size is possible in Quizlet, but learners must determine the optimal block size themselves.
  9. Adaptive sequencing. Quizlet does not meet this criterion, because it does not have a function that allows for adaptive sequencing of future study sessions based on the learner’s previous performance. In adaptive sequencing, lexical items which were previously successfully learned appear less frequently while items which gave the learner difficulty on earlier quizzes appear more frequently.
  10. Expanded rehearsal. Quizlet does not offer an expanded rehearsal function, or one which creates a review schedule “where the intervals between study trials are gradually increased” over time (Nakata, 2011, p. 21).

Quizlet’s performance related to Nakata’s (2011) criteria are summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Criteria for evaluating a web-based flashcard

Features Quizlet
Flashcard creation Yes
Multilingual support Yes
Multi-word units Yes
Types of information Meaning, image, audio
Presentation mode Yes
Retrieval mode Yes
Receptive recall Yes
Receptive recognition Yes
Productive recall Yes
Productive recognition Yes
Retrieval effort No
Generative use No
Block size Can be determined by learners
Adaptive sequencing No
Expanded rehearsal No

Conclusion

Quizlet is an effective vocabulary learning tool, allowing users to take control of their own lexical learning. Even though Quizlet does not meet all of the aforementioned criteria of an ideal web-based flashcard program, it is still an extremely useful and easy to use tool for both teachers and students.

References

Allum, P. (2004). Evaluation of CALL: Initial vocabulary learning. ReCALL, 16(2), 488-501.

Altiner, C. (2011). Integrating a computer-based flashcard program into academic vocabulary learning. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, the USA. Retrieved March 10, 2014 from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=etd

Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal, and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McLean, S., Hogg, N., & Rush, T. W. (2013). Vocabulary learning through an online computerized flashcard site. The jaltcalljournal, 9(1), 79-98.

Nakata, T. (2011). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 17–38.

Nakata, T. (2013). Optimising second language vocabulary learning from flashcards. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in other language. NY: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I.S.P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. MA: Heinle.

Quizlet. (2014). About Quizlet. Quizlet. Retrieved April 30, 2014 from http://quizlet.com/mission

About the Reviewer

TRI Hoang Dang <dang.trihoanghoasen.edu.vn> is a full-time lecturer of English in the Faculty of Languages and Cultural Studies, Hoa Sen University, Vietnam. He holds an MA in Applied Linguistics from Curtin University of Technology, Australia. His research interests are content and language integrated learning (CLIL), ICT use in English language learning, vocabulary learning, and sociolinguistics.

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.