• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Edmodo: The Facebook of Learning Platforms

May 2016 – Volume 20, Number 1

Title Edmodo
Developer Edmodo, Inc.
Contact Information https://www.edmodo.com/contact
Type of Product Web-based social networking learning platform
Platform Web-based online platform

Mobile applications available for iOS (8.0 and later), Android (2.3 and later) and Windows Phone (Windows 8 and later)

Price The website and mobile applications are free to use without limitations. Some third-party applications within the platform offer premium or subscription options after an initial trial period.
Help Center https://support.edmodo.com/hc/en-us

Introduction

Considering the large number of research articles and how-to papers on the topic, integrating technology into instruction and creating e-learning content seem to be topics of interest to many educators today. However, the sheer number of tools available can be overwhelming, especially when taking into account the additional learning curve of the “digital immigrant” generations (Prensky, 2001). Therefore, it is important to look at the options available to teachers with these points in mind.

Edmodo is a free, online e-learning platform that allows teachers to create and share content with students and to track learning. Edmodo offers accounts for teachers, students, and parents, and its familiar looking interface and relative simplicity make it a strong candidate for teachers looking to take advantage of the learning opportunities afforded by this type of tool.

In addition to its basic functions, users have pointed out that Edmodo is useful as a tool for back-channel communication (Stevens, 2012, p. 5), a blog or wiki (Son, 2011, p. 3), a social learning platform (Dowling, 2011, p. 7), and a microblogging platform (Newgarden, 2009, p. 13; Stevens, 2009, p. 13; Dowling, 2013, p. 2). This illustrates how Edmodo can be understood differently depending on the features the user chooses to focus on. In the present review, Edmodo will be examined as a social network learning platform, and in the following sections, the workings and limitations of the site are addressed.

General Description

Registering for Edmodo is fast and requires submitting only basic information (see Figure 1).
After registering for a teacher account, instructors can create and manage online classes and document student learning. Teachers can invite students to join their classes through a uniquely generated group code to ensure that only appropriate people have access to the course (see Figure 1). Upon registering, students receive a code that their parents can use to see course progress; however, they need to verify their relationship to the student during registration. There is also the option to link the Edmodo account with a Microsoft Office 365 account.


Figure 1. Student and parent account registration process on Edmodo

The basic mission of Edmodo is to provide instructors and learners with a learning management system (LMS) that utilizes the users’ familiarity with social networks like Facebook to help establish a learning community. The similarities with established social networks like Facebook are immediately visible in the familiar blue header and the layout of the main sections (see Figure 2). This is an important feature from a design standpoint as it helps to minimize the learning curve experienced by learners new to e-learning.

Figure 2 shows the teacher interface of Edmodo, which has the most features of the three possible account types (teacher, student, and parent). It can be divided into ten major sections. The left side of the header (1) covers the home, class progress and library menus, the middle (2) is occupied by the search engine of the site, while on the right (7) Spotlight (an option to upload, publish and share materials), notifications and the user profile can be found. On the left of the screen there are options to display a teacher profile (3) and manage groups and communities (4). The middle of the screen is reserved for classwork options (5), including notes, assignments, quizzes, polls, and the ability to send alerts about what should be done. Below, the newsfeed of the communities the user has joined will appear (6), which in this case is illustrated by Language Arts. Finally, on the right side of the screen, one can invite colleagues (8) and contact the help center (9). The last section on the right margin consists of the application store, the application manager and launcher, the calendar in the form of Edmodo Planner, and an option to link Microsoft Office Online with classes (10).


Figure 2. The teacher interface of Edmodo

Features

Edmodo is a versatile learning platform that can be used for a number of learning purposes. One simple possibility is to set up a library of different folders containing files and links for students to access via Edmodo. Both students and teacher can link their libraries with their Google Drive or OneNote accounts. Another commonly used feature of Edmodo is to deliver and collect assignments and quizzes. Assignments and quizzes can be scheduled to appear at a preset time, and relevant files can be added to them. Edmodo also offers the ability to set up polls, which can serve as a tool to discover and discuss students’ positions on issues.

Perhaps the most useful feature of Edmodo is its quiz creation tool (see Figure 3). If the user clicks on the quiz option in the middle of the screen (see point 5 in Figure 2), five possible question types appear to choose from: multiple choice, true or false, fill in the blanks, matching, and short answer.


Figure 3. Quiz creation on Edmodo

With the exception of the short answer option, the quizzes can be automatically graded using answers preset by the teacher. This means that students can get instant feedback on their performance (see Figure 4). The short answer question type allows for more complex items; while this option requires manual correction, it also gives teachers the ability to write comments on the students’ answers and give partial scores as well.


Figure 4. Example of the instantaneous feedback Edmodo provides for gap-filling item types

Quizzes require the teacher to set a time limit and provide a short description. After this, there are three more options available: previewing the quiz to make sure everything appears as it should, the option to randomize questions, and an option to print the quiz for in-class use. By applying multimedia possibilities and linking audio files in the description, it is also possible to create listening tasks within the quiz function. Overall, item creation is quite intuitive and happens through an easily navigable menu. In addition to the results accessible by viewing individual students’ answers, Edmodo also provides a highly useful feature for item validation purposes in the form of pie charts depicting students’ performance (see Figure 5). This information makes it possible for teachers to improve their questions where needed for further implementation.


Figure 5. Sample from Edmodo’s pie chart and score statistics

Keeping track of student performance is a key feature of any LMS. Edmodo creates a progress table for every course (see point 1 on Figure 2) where students’ scores on quizzes and assignments are tracked and an overall percentage score is calculated (see Figure 6). Teachers can see the scores of the class as a whole or of individual students, and the progress gradebook can be exported as an Excel file for further analysis.


Figure 6. A sample from the progress table on the teacher interface on Edmodo

There are several other options for course customization using Edmodo. First, as a possibility for increasing student motivation and engagement, teachers can opt to add badges, which students receive after attaining certain achievements. Edmodo has a number of standard badges that are available in all courses, and it is also possible to create, assign, and share new ones across courses.

Second, a number of applications are available from the site’s app store that enable the delivery of more personalized course content (see point 10 on Figure 2). These are sorted into the different subject areas that are available on Edmodo and, depending on the application are either free, or have a trial period and then a premium (pay) option. Making use of them enables users to overcome some of the limitations of the site.

Limitations

While Edmodo is a very useful tool in many ways, it does have some limitations. If one considers some of the MOOC platforms like Coursera, edX, or Udacity, one limitation is immediately apparent: Edmodo lacks the video lesson feature. Although Edmodo does not claim to compete with those platforms, nor is it aimed at instructing large numbers of students simultaneously, offering such a feature could further the interactiveness of the learning experience, which is perhaps of particular importance to language teachers. Similarly, there is no possibility to stream lessons as can be done using WizIQ. The limited means of interaction on the site also keep Edmodo from being a fully constructivist Web 2.0 tool.

Overall Evaluation

The limitations of Edmodo mean that, depending on the teachers’ aims and the course requirements, the basic site may not be sufficient for some and a possible expansion of features using additional tools or may be necessary. For example, conference sessions can only be held with additional solutions like Skype. However, Edmodo has a number of features that make it a versatile tool for incorporating e-learning strategies into traditional settings, for augmenting face-to-face lessons, and to afford opportunities for collaborative and cooperative learning in small groups.

Conclusion

Edmodo is a highly useful and intuitive LMS that can function as the main platform for many types of e-learning projects. It makes it possible to create courses with a number of features, supporting both face-to-face and online initiatives. The educational possibilities of its features outweigh its limitations, many of which can be mitigated with additional tools or software. The user interface’s similarity with that of Facebook makes it intuitive for students to use without interfering with their private social networking. Various subject areas are supported by active online communities of teachers, which make it possible for educators to network and share experiences. Athough Edmodo may not be perfect for everyone, it is arguably the best free social network learning platform currently available.

References

Dowling, S. (2011). Web-based learning: Moving from learning islands to learning environments. TESL-EJ, 15 (2), 1-27.

Dowling, S. (2013). Using blogs to share learner-generated content. TESL-EJ, 17 (2), 1-22.

Newgarden, K. (2009). Annotated bibliography – Twitter, social networking, and communities of practice. TESL-EJ, 13 (2),1-20.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 1. On the Horizon, 9 (5), 1-6.

Son, J.-B. (2011). Online tools for language teaching. TESL-EJ, 15 (1), 1-12.

Stevens, V. (2009). Modeling social media in groups, communities, and networks. TESL-EJ, 13 (3), 1-16.

Stevens, V. (2012). Learner-centered do-it-yourself learning management systems. TESL-EJ, 15 (4), 1-14.

About the Reviewer

Krisztián Simon <skrisztian88gmail.com> is a third year Ph.D. student in the doctoral programme in English Applied Linguistics and TEFL/ TESOL at the University of Pécs in Hungary. His main research areas are e-learning and content development.

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.