• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Cultural Knowledge and Values in English Language Teaching Materials: (Multimodal) Representations and Stakeholders

May 2023 – Volume 27, Number 1

https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27105r2

Cultural Knowledge and Values in English Language Teaching Materials: (Multimodal) Representations and Stakeholders

Authors: Tao Xiong, Dezheng Feng, Guangwei Hu (Eds) (2022) book cover
Publisher: Springer
Pages ISBN-13 Price
181 pages 9789811919343 (hardcover) $98.80 U.S.

The study of culture and values in language education is crucial since the cultural identity of speakers may be reflected in how they use the language, and the language itself can be a tool for learning cultures and values. In the context of language learning resources, research has previously shown that language teaching materials potentially mediate sociocultural values (Gray, 2010; Setyono & Widodo, 2019), moral values (Feng, 2019), and ideologies (Curdt-Christiansen & Weninger, 2015; Ulum & Köksal, 2019). Yet, past studies have lacked a focus on cultural issues from the perspective of critical curriculum studies, critical applied linguistics, politics, economy, and multilingualism. Tao Xiong, Dezheng Feng, and Guangwie Hu set out to address these gaps in Cultural Knowledge and Values in English Language Teaching Materials: (Multimodal) Representations and Stakeholders. This book contains a collection of prevailing core issues, approaches, and debates in English language education materials design and development by highlighting how to consider the representation of the content critically, the need to integrate other types of learning media (multimodal), and what the stakeholders of language education can contribute to a more inclusive and equal learning environment.

The book consists of nine chapters divided into two parts. The first part of this book discusses the representation of culture and values in language teaching materials and the multimodal analysis of ELT textbooks, casting light on empirical studies of the sociocultural values and language ideology in textbooks situated in English language education for general and specific purposes. In the opening chapter, the meanings of culture and values adopted in this book contain a broad cultural understanding consisting of knowledge and community heritage which can be both material (tools, food, clothes) and intellectual (values, beliefs). Moreover, the multimodal analysis of ELT textbooks here consists of two broad categories, namely (1) studies on the multimodal construction of pedagogical knowledge and (2) studies on the multimodal representation of gender, culture, moral values, and ideologies. Anchored in a multimodal approach, Chapter 2 reveals that the values in texts and images depicted in a mandated business English coursebook for China tertiary students comprise business-, culture-, and society-oriented values. From different methodological lenses rooted in a social semiotic approach, Chapter 3 discovers some possible elements of EFL textbooks that inculcate values: reading passages with problem-solution discourse patterns to deliver values, the lexical choice to convey implicit and explicit meanings, and visualization of expressions of positive values. Considering the broader scope of learning and teaching materials involving introduction videos, coursebooks, and the content of an online English course, Chapter 4 arrives at a conclusion toward western cultural hegemony in China, such as treating native-speaker-like as a norm. In Chapter 5, the textbook analysis echoes the issue of gender bias, such as the relatively disproportionate and stereotypical portrayal of women in workplace environments. The authors suggested designing language textbooks with a focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Additionally, a content analysis study of culture in college textbooks is reported in Chapter 6 and portrays the domination of native-speaker-related content.
The second part considers stakeholders or the people involved in the production and consumption of textbooks, such as publishers and their editors, content writers, teachers, and students. Chapter 7 identifies three orientations involved in writing textbooks, namely language orientations, issue orientations, and ideological orientations. A multiple-case study revealed that teachers’ beliefs and visions about the business English curriculum, the scope and design of topics, and related activities greatly influence their agency in implementing and designing cultural teaching in the classroom. In Chapter 8, a content analysis was used to discuss the process and rationale for writing ELT materials that are pedagogically, morally, culturally, and ideologically meaningful to learners from the authors’ perspective of a series of tertiary EFL textbooks published in China. It revealed that the writing team had internal and external constraints in compiling tertiary English textbooks. The authors pinpointed the challenges and the complexity of combining values in ELT materials in multicultural societal contexts, such as Asian countries, and it needs cautious attention. Finally, Chapter 9 integrates multimodal and ethnographic methods to close the book by presenting two cases in the Uruguayan ELT context regarding the process of producing English textbooks and their use in the classroom. The authors call for methodological innovations considering how textbook writers, teachers, and students negotiate heterogeneous visual representations of gender in textbooks.

This volume does suffer from some drawbacks. As the edited book comprises some cases related to cultural values, namely “sociolinguistics, political economy, and citizenship education” (p. 14), the existing chapters seem to fail to represent specific globally recent issues such as neoliberalism and inclusivity. If there is a second edition, it would be a complete book with additional chapters to cater to neoliberalism, minority groups, and disabled discourses in ELT classroom materials. Additionally, the studies of countries other than China would offer unique and insightful reports for other language practitioners in the broader region of Asia.

For the book’s strengths, the collection of chapters is written concisely and reader friendly. Teachers and student teachers can easily grasp the theoretical considerations and teaching methodology suggestions regarding incorporating cultural values and their selection in the development of language materials. Moreover, for language researchers, some steps in the methodology section of each chapter can be replicable for further similar studies.

Once again, this book is a must-have reference for language practitioners and stakeholders. Some empirical reports of textbook studies can inspire teachers to understand that language materials are value-laden. This book can be a research-based evaluation of sociolinguistics for coursebook authors, revealing other hidden issues beyond the selected written, visual, and audio texts. Additionally, for everyone involved in language education, the book emphasizes the engagement of more inclusive, diverse, equitable, critical, and multimodal global citizens (Gaudelli, 2016; Oxley & Morris, 2013) with language textbooks.

To Cite this Review

Ifadloh, N. & Yonata, F. (2022). [Review of the book Cultural Knowledge and Values in English Language Teaching Materials by T. Xiong, D. Feng, & G. Hu (Eds.)]. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27105r2

References

Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Weninger, C. (2015). Language, ideology, and education: The politics of textbooks in language education. Routledge.

Feng, W. D. (2019). Infusing moral education into English language teaching: An ontogenetic analysis of social values in EFL textbooks in Hong Kong. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(4), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1356806

Gaudelli, W. (2016). Global citizenship education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315683492

Gray, J. (2010). The construction of English: Culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT global coursebook. Palgrave Macmillan.

Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.798393

Setyono, B., & Widodo, H. P. (2019). The representation of multicultural values in the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture-Endorsed EFL textbook: A critical discourse analysis. Intercultural Education, 30(4), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2019.1548102

Ulum, Ö. G., & Köksal, D. (2019). Ideology and hegemony of English foreign language textbooks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35809-9

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to express the deepest gratitude to Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP) for sponsoring their doctoral study and supporting this article’s publication.

About the reviewers

Nur Ifadloh is a doctoral candidate in the Language Education study program at Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia, and a lecturer of English language education at STAI Rasyidiyah Khalidiyah (Rakha) Amuntai, Indonesia. His research interests include language material development, textbook analysis, formulaic communicative competencies, and applied linguistics. ORCID ID: 0009-0004-1743-956X, nurifadlohatmarkgmail.com

Fadhila Yonata is a doctoral candidate in the Language Education study program at Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia, and a lecturer of English language education at STAIN Sultan Abdurrahman Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia. His research interests include language material development, textbook analysis, cultures and values in textbooks, intercultural citizenship education, and critical discourse studies. ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8983-9771, fadhilayonata92atmarkgmail.com

Copyright of articles rests with the authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.