{"id":21423,"date":"2024-04-26T18:06:16","date_gmt":"2024-04-27T02:06:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/?page_id=21423"},"modified":"2024-04-26T21:07:21","modified_gmt":"2024-04-27T05:07:21","slug":"ej109s1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/issues\/volume28\/ej109\/ej109s1\/","title":{"rendered":"A Future of Hope and Dread: How K-12 Pre-service Language Teachers are Situating Their Identities within Modern Japanese Value and Belief Systems"},"content":{"rendered":"

May 2024 – Volume 28, Number 1<\/h2>\n

https:\/\/doi.org\/10.55593\/ej.28109s1<\/strong><\/p>\n

Matthew Nall<\/strong>
\nMiyagi University, Japan
\n<matthewgarynall\"atmark\"gmail.com><\/p>\n

Takaaki Hiratsuka<\/strong>
\nRyukoku University, Japan
\n<takaakihiratsuka\"atmark\"gmail.com><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/h3>\n

The current study is located among the body of language teacher identity research by focusing on the identities of pre-service language teachers in Japan. This study looks at how pre-service language teacher identities are situated among Japanese values and belief systems and investigates how participants are coping with disrupted language teacher identities as they are preparing to embark on teaching careers. Three pre-service teachers took part in this study, and data originated from narrative frames and semi-structured interviews. These participants are preparing for future employment as K-12 English teachers in Japan. Drawing upon grounded theory and Gross\u2019 (2015) process model of emotional regulation, findings illustrate the conflicted manner in which pre-service teachers are constructing their nascent language teacher identities against the backdrop of Japanese values and belief systems and the realities of teaching in Japan. In this context, the participants are approaching their future careers with deeply held emotions of both hope and dread, complicating the development of empowered language teacher identities. Additionally, this study found that the participants were able to employ Gross\u2019 (2015) emotional regulation strategies to varying degrees of success. This article concludes with implications for pre-service teachers and pre-service teacher training programs in Japan and abroad.<\/p>\n

Keywords<\/em><\/strong>: EFL teaching in Japan, emotional regulation, language teacher identity, pre-service language teachers<\/p>\n

For the language teacher, constructing a professional identity is one of the most important components in establishing and maintaining a resilient career (see Barkhuizen, 2017; De Costa & Norton, 2017; Kayi-Aydar, 2015; Kayi-Aydar et al., 2019; Robertson & Yazan, 2022), and in the teaching profession, the language teacher identity construction process begins early in one\u2019s professional life. Pre-service teachers are simultaneously gathering important pedagogical knowledge while they are in the early stages of developing their language teacher identities (Hiratsuka & Okuma, 2021; Kanno & Stuart, 2011; Lindahl & Yazan, 2019). University studies can be informative and reassuring for pre-service teachers. However, their futures are always unknown, and the process of teacher identity construction is emotionally laden (see Benesch, 2012, 2017; Hiratsuka, 2016, 2022, 2023b; Hiratsuka & Barkhuizen, 2015; Song, 2016; Wolff & De Costa, 2017). For pre-service teachers, their teacher identity developments are directed by both the ambitions and interests of the individual and by various external forces.<\/p>\n

The world that we live in today is becoming increasingly complex, often categorized by elements of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) (Mack et al., 2016). As teacher identities can be influenced by forces in this sociocultural environment\u2014such as concepts of self, positioning, and meaning systems (Olsen, 2008)\u2014there is a need to investigate teacher identity construction in specific contexts. Pre-service teachers are preparing for careers in teaching, but as they find themselves entrenched in the VUCA social paradigm, there is a risk that they may often find themselves at an intersection between indisposition and perseverance in regard to their professional lives. Indisposition is a feeling of uneasiness that arises when teachers perceive themselves as being unprepared to adapt to changes that require a shift in their educational approach (Esteve, 1994). Perseverance is the perceived capacity to successfully navigate and overcome challenging situations. (Stoltz, 1997). There is tension between these two in the lives of pre-service teachers as they work towards establishing their identities in a new community of practice. Such tensions need to be examined in empirical research. This research is especially urgent because \u201ctoo little attention to the personal dimension in learning a teacher identity risks the danger of novice teachers leaving the profession\u201d (Pugach et al., 2019, p. 4). The current study considers pre-service teachers in Japan as they approach their careers and construct their language teacher identities.<\/p>\n

Japanese Values and Beliefs Regarding Teachers and Education<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Japanese term sensei<\/em> is commonly translated as \u201cteacher.\u201d However, its actual connotations are much broader. In modern Japanese society, sensei <\/em>is also used to refer to doctors, writers, politicians, lawyers, and clergy (Tsujimura, 1991). Teachers, therefore, are socially positioned within a highly valued professional cohort in Japanese culture and society. Two recent studies have targeted the social evaluation and the status of teachers in Japanese society.<\/p>\n

The Varkey Foundation conducted two studies on teacher status (Varkey Foundation, 2013, 2018), which surveyed 1000 citizens in each of 35 countries, giving insight into how teacher status is perceived by the general public in each country. When compared, these studies showed an increase in teacher status (20 points) in Japan between 2013 and 2018, suggesting a growing appreciation for teachers. Japan also scored positively in terms of students\u2019 respect for teachers (Varkey Foundation, 2018). However, perceptions of teacher status in Japan remained moderate when compared to the other 34 countries, and it lagged far behind countries such as China, Korea, and Singapore. In fact, when asked, \u201cWould you encourage your child to become a teacher?\u201d Japan had one of the least positive overall responses (Varkey Foundation, 2018, p. 45). The apparent disconnect between Japanese societies\u2019 respect for teachers and the reluctance of parents to recommend the teaching profession to their children may be culturally and socially ingrained, and it makes Japan an interesting site for research on teacher status.<\/p>\n

Culturally speaking, Japanese society has Confucian roots, and Asian cultures tend to hold respect for both mastery of a skill (e.g., subject matter) and group cohesion (i.e., an educational outcome) (see Huang & Brown, 2009; Wen & Clem\u00e9nt, 2003). This places teachers at a core position in the Japanese values and belief systems. The cultural value of authority has traditionally been placed in the role of the teacher, and the historically rooted Confucian paradigm urges the development of the group as a whole\u2014a process by which teachers play a leading role. The socially and culturally valued position of teachers and teaching in Japan, however, does come at a cost.<\/p>\n

In recent years, the language teaching profession in Japan has become increasingly difficult as the educational environment has changed. Over the past decades, the Japanese government has tried to improve English education through various policy changes. The rationale was that there was a need in a globalized society to focus more on learners\u2019 English communicative abilities. However, English study has historically been focused on the development of linguistic knowledge (see Markova & Rogers, 2004; McVeigh, 2002; Ushioda, 2013). Due to its dynamic nature, English educational policy has been referred to as being marked by a \u201cpermanent sense of crisis\u201d (Ryan, 2009, p. 407), and some have argued that teachers lack self-confidence or the ability to implement English classroom reforms in accordance with policy changes (see Glasgow, 2014; Ikeda et al., 2019, 2020; Nagamine, 2015; Thompson & Yanagita, 2017).<\/p>\n

Adding to the difficulty that persistent policy changes pose to teachers, teachers\u2019 workloads in other areas may also negatively impact how teachers feel about their careers. The teaching profession in Japan has also come to be characterized by many non-teaching duties, such as completing administrative tasks or being involved in school sports and extracurricular activities (Hiratsuka, 2023a). This has resulted in a situation where many teachers have had to work a significant number of overtime hours, contributing to job dissatisfaction and high attrition rates (see also Nagamine, 2018). It was reported that \u201ca record high 953 teachers at public schools left jobs for mental health reasons in the 2021 academic year\u201d (The Japan Times, 2023). More recently, it has been reported that the number of teachers who took leave due to mental illness\u20146,539 in 2022\u2014has also hit a record high (Japan Today, 2024).<\/p>\n

Aware of these problems, the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology periodically investigates teacher well-being, and it is widely known that teachers in Japan work long hours (see OECD, 2018). The Japan Trade Union Confederation found that the majority of teachers self-reported more than 80 hours of overtime per month (JTUC, 2016). Such overwork has been linked to an increased risk of heart disease (Araki & Iwasaki, 2005; Takahashi, 2019) and is considered the threshold for karoshi<\/em>\u2014death from overwork (Kuwato & Hirano, 2020). Stress, long working hours, interpersonal relationship difficulties, conflicts with students or parents, and a lack of agency necessary to fix any of those problems are all contributing factors to mental and physical health risks for teachers. The educational system in Japan has even come to be known as black kigyou<\/em>\u2014a term used to denote an institution that is known to exploit its employees with little or no real concern for their well-being (see Bunyarat & Tuptim, 2023). In short, in Japan, the respectable job of a teacher is increasingly being viewed as an undesirable career choice. Nevertheless, education still plays a central role in Japanese society. A robust society cannot exist without a functioning and healthy educational system, and teachers continue to make up the heart of education in Japan. Language teacher identity, therefore, plays an integral part in determining how a teacher performs and persists throughout their teaching career in Japan.<\/p>\n

Language Teacher Identity<\/h4>\n

Broadly speaking, language teacher identity research has become commonplace in the academic field of applied linguistics because it has \u201cintroduced a new framework to theorize and analyze the complex ways in which teachers learn to be and become teachers, grow as teachers, and exercise their practices situated in sociohistorical, cultural, and political contexts\u201d (Yazan & Lindahl, 2020, p. 1). Norton (2013) defined identity as \u201chow a person understands his or her relationship to the world, how that relationship is structured across time and space, and how the person understands possibilities for the future\u201d (p. 45). Language teacher identity research can play an important role in supporting and improving the professional working lives of teachers.<\/p>\n

Concerning pre-service teacher identity, language teacher identity construction is an ongoing process, as English teachers in EFL contexts are themselves learning to teach a second language (Kanno & Stuart, 2011; Tsui, 2011). Pre-service teachers are in the process of joining a community of professionals, and communities of practice are of interest because they can directly impact the identities of language teachers (Trent, 2017; Yazan, 2017). In the effort to establish themselves in their careers, pre-service teachers are constructing a professional identity that strikes a balance between their personal desires and the expectations of others. In other words, language teacher identity construction is both directed by the individual and contextually mediated by external forces (Fan & de Jong, 2019; Gu & Benson, 2015). It can also be beneficial to view the \u2018novice-ness\u2019 <\/em>of language teachers from the perspective of identity construction, as contextual factors influence individuals\u2019 identities in the early stages of their language teaching careers (Nazari et al., 2023). In addition, pre-service teachers are heavily influenced by their imagined<\/em> language teacher identities and imagined<\/em> communities of practice. For them, identity construction is a dynamic process that is mediated by prior learning experiences, beliefs, hands-on teaching practice, as well as institutional culture (Jiang et al., 2021).<\/p>\n

The current scenario surrounding the teaching profession in Japan poses a problem for well-intentioned individuals pursuing a teaching career. Despite being an admirable profession amongst Japanese values and belief systems, given its drawbacks and risks, stakeholders have to wonder whether it is really worthwhile. Hence, there is an urgent and pressing need for language teacher identity research studies to be conducted in Japan (see Hiratsuka, 2022, 2023a, 2023b; Nall, 2021), and the present study aims to fill this gap in the research. The research questions in the present study are:<\/p>\n

(1) How are pre-service language teacher identities situated within the sociocultural values and belief systems in modern-day Japan?<\/p>\n

(2) In terms of Gross\u2019 (2015) process model of emotional regulation, how are pre-service teachers in Japan positioning their identities for careers as language teachers?<\/p>\n

Methods<\/h3>\n

Context and Participants<\/h4>\n

This case study took place at two universities in Japan. Both universities had teacher training programs, granting us access to potential research participants. This research is especially of interest to stakeholders in language teaching due to the valued and demanding job of language teachers in this context. The pre-service teacher participants entered their university to pursue an English teaching license and are aiming for careers as English teachers. They are dedicating themselves to their university studies amid the backdrop of teachers\u2019 status and working conditions as outlined above.<\/p>\n

Prior to conducting research, an ethics review was completed. The second author is a Ph.D. advisor to the first author, and the ethics review was completed at the second author\u2019s university. The research was explained, and participants gave written consent before any data was collected. The present study is one part of a larger project, and the three participants (see Table 1) were selected for this particular study because of the relevant information that they had provided in the initial data collection. The participants were undergraduate or graduate students between 19 and 22 years old. Aside from student teaching or part-time tutoring, none of them had any extensive teaching experience. They had different majors but were all pursuing English teaching licenses. Participants were selected by means of convenience and purposeful sampling, as they were all known to the researchers before the research began (convenience sampling), and they were able to provide valuable data needed to address the research questions (purposeful sampling). All data was collected during the 2022 academic school year, and all names are pseudonyms.<\/p>\n

Table 1. Participant Biographical Information<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Name<\/td>\nAge<\/td>\nGender<\/td>\nStudent status<\/td>\nMajor<\/td>\nDesired Future Job<\/td>\nCEFR English Proficiency<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ryosuke<\/td>\n19<\/td>\nMale<\/td>\nUndergraduate<\/td>\nElementary English Education<\/td>\nElementary school English teacher<\/td>\nB2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Nana<\/td>\n21<\/td>\nFemale<\/td>\nUndergraduate<\/td>\nEnglish Communication<\/td>\nJunior high school English teacher<\/td>\nB2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Takeru<\/td>\n22<\/td>\nMale<\/td>\nGraduate<\/td>\nLanguage Communication<\/td>\nHigh school English teacher<\/td>\nC1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Research Procedures<\/h4>\n

Data collection was conducted in two phases. First, the participants filled out three narrative frames (Appendix A<\/a>). Narrative frames (Barkhuizen, 2014; Barkhuizen & Wette, 2008) are a scaffolded writing data collection instrument. The participant is given sentence starters, which they complete with their own ideas. The structured nature allows researchers to steer the participants into providing data related to the research questions, but their open-endedness permits participants the freedom to freely reveal their own experiences and thoughts. For this study, the frames were constructed by referring to previous studies in similar contexts (e.g., Hiratsuka, 2014, 2018).<\/p>\n

Participants were given a two-week period to complete three different narrative frames in English. Narrative frame 1 aimed to identify the participants\u2019 personal histories and future career goals. Narrative frame two was designed to give us access to the participants\u2019 ideas about the future of education and their future language teacher identities. Narrative frame 3 required the participants to imagine foreign language education around the year 2050 and make guesses about how changes in the educational field might impact language teacher identities. All responses were assembled in a spreadsheet for analysis. In the discussion below, the participants\u2019 narrative frame data will be referenced according to their first initial and the numbered narrative frame, which is quoted or paraphrased. For example, Nana\u2019s narrative frame one will be cited as \u2018NNF1.\u2019<\/p>\n

Semi-structured interviews (Corbin & Strauss, 2015) were conducted in phase 2 and lasted approximately 1 hour each (Appendix B<\/a>). This format allows the researcher to guide the interview in relation to the research aims and objectives, yet it allows for the exploration of various topics as they arise in conversation. In other words, pre-determined questions were used as a jumping-off point, but much of the dialogue centered around ideas and topics that the interviewees themselves raised. Interviews were conducted by the first author in Japanese so that the participants could express themselves clearly and at length, and interview questions aimed at exploring the participants\u2019 reasons for becoming an English teacher, their thoughts about their future careers and identities, and about educational changes that they thought were likely to occur in the future. Interviews were translated and transcribed into English for the data analysis.<\/p>\n

Data Analysis<\/h4>\n

To address research question 1, data analysis was driven by constructing grounded theory (Charmaz, 2014) to allow for the emergence of the findings from the data itself. This was done through inductive and deductive methods and utilized \u201citerative strategies of going back and forth between the data and analysis\u201d (Charmaz, 2014, p. 1). This constructivist approach to data analysis also recognizes the interrelatedness between the participants and the researcher as meaning is co-constructed. This was especially true for the semi-structured interviews. In accordance with grounded theory, the data were coded for emergent themes, which are addressed in the following sections.<\/p>\n

Regarding research question 2, the findings were coded and organized in accordance with Gross\u2019 (2015) process model of emotional regulation (see Appendix C<\/a> for data analysis codes and a coding sample from the data set). Gross (2015) argues that \u201cemotions can be either helpful or harmful, depending on the context\u201d (Gross, 2015, p. 4). Emotions take a wide variety of forms, and when emotions arise, they present the individual with opportunities to implement and exercise various emotional regulation strategies. Emotion regulation is chiefly characterized by the initiation of a purposeful effort to shape the course of emotional experiences (Gross et al., 2011). Human emotions and emotional regulation strategies are numerous, and in an effort to codify and organize these, Gross proposed the process model of emotional regulation (Gross, 2015). This model specifically identifies and elaborates on five emotional regulation strategies: situation selection, situation modification, attentional deployment, cognitive change, and response modulation. This theoretical framework was chosen for this study because teachers\u2019 identity construction processes are intertwined with emotional processes by which they position themselves in preparation for professional careers (Barcelos, 2015; Hiratsuka, 2023b). In Aspinwall & Taylor\u2019s (1997) words, emotional regulation is a form of \u2018proactive coping\u2019 and is \u201ca process whereby an individual builds skills and resources to predict and prevent future emotional events\u201d (Morris & King, 2020, p. 200). The data pointed to strategies the participants employed that were in accordance with Gross\u2019 (2015) model. These stages will be addressed individually in the findings below.<\/p>\n

Findings<\/h3>\n

Language Teacher Identities within Educational Value and Beliefs Systems<\/h4>\n

Beginning with research question 1, as established, teachers are highly regarded in Japan, and teaching is viewed as a difficult but altruistic profession. However, teachers\u2019 heavy workload contributes to a buildup of stress and can lead to physical and mental health problems, burnout, and attrition. The literature review has given us an idea of how in-service <\/em>language teacher identities are situated within sociocultural values and belief systems in Japan. However, to address how pre-service<\/em> teachers are situating their identities, it is necessary to analyze how the participants\u2019 identities are positioned as they approach their careers. In accordance with grounded theory, two themes emerged from the data that help answer research question 1: feelings of hope and dread.<\/p>\n

Feelings of hope. <\/strong>Participants were asked about how they felt about becoming a language teacher. Many of their responses showed an exuberance for their careers. Nana, for example, is studying to become a junior high school English teacher. In narrative frame 1, she wrote that she feels \u201cconfident . . . because [she] really want[s] to become a teacher\u201d (NNF1). When asked about this, she said, \u201cThe biggest reason to become a teacher is just to become involved with children\u2019s lives.\u201d As Japanese society values teachers, Nana also views teaching as a worthwhile career in which she can influence the lives of students. Digging deeper, Nana revealed:<\/p>\n

I wanted to become an elementary school teacher, but after coming to university, I realized how much fun it could be to teach English, and I really admired my teachers [in junior and senior high school]. So, I changed my idea and wanted to become an English teacher.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This statement showcases how pre-service teacher identities are malleable. One can see how positive emotions arising from her assessment of the lives of her teachers can influence the trajectory of one\u2019s career path.<\/p>\n

Like Nana, Ryosuke felt motivated and confident because \u201c[he likes] teaching, children, and English\u201d (RNF1). He also mentioned that he \u201cfeel[s] the necessity of English in Japan\u201d (RNF2). This statement places Ryosuke, as a teacher, in an essential position within Japanese society and suggests that he feels that he can influence not only students but also society as a whole. Regarding his rationale, Ryosuke chose teaching because teachers \u201cshould be focused on the children . . . to help them become adults. To look to the future and help them grow up . . . Not to make them grow up, but to support them in growing up.\u201d Ryosuke felt motivated to become a teacher for the altruistic goal of helping children grow up, adding depth to the idea that he is hopeful and enthusiastic about his future career.<\/p>\n

Takeru was optimistic about his career because of his part-time cram school teaching experience coupled with his practical teaching experience as a university student (TNF1). When questioned about his reasons for choosing this career, he claimed that his high school teacher supported him, and thanks to him, Takeru had a fulfilling high school life (Takeru). Takeru views the teaching career as valuable and wants to contribute positively to his future students\u2019 lives.<\/p>\n

Considering their developing language teacher identities, the participants displayed hopeful feelings about their future careers. Aligned with Japanese values and beliefs about education, the participants viewed teaching as important, and they maintained positive attitudes for their future careers. While the participants had a hopeful exuberance for teaching, not all the emotions displayed in the data were positive.<\/p>\n

Feelings of dread. <\/strong>Despite having positive attitudes, the participants were also keenly aware of the negative aspects of teaching in Japan, giving rise to negative emotions, primarily dread. Nana revealed that \u201cteachers have a lot of work\u201d (NNF2). When questioned, Nana said, \u201cI\u2019ve heard rumors [from my seniors]. The work\u2014not the teaching\u2014but other schoolwork is too much. A lot of extra work is assigned . . . I don\u2019t want to do that kind of work.\u201d This awareness gives rise to Nana\u2019s feeling of dread about the teachers’ workload. This feeling appears to be a complicating factor in Nana\u2019s identity development. She is hesitant and fearful of teachers\u2019 extra duties and is therefore hesitant to take on a career in teaching.<\/p>\n

Ryosuke and Takeru showed similar concerns (RNF3, TNF3). When asked, Ryosuke said, \u201cThe working hours are too long and too busy for teachers (Ryosuke). When discussing the expectations that are placed on teachers, Takeru claimed:<\/p>\n

Teachers work from Monday until Sunday. Every day they have club activities . . . When I was a high school student, my homeroom teacher, when he would have to do things related to his son, like the entrance ceremony or graduation, he couldn\u2019t participate in those kinds of things . . . I really want to value the time together with my family in the future. If the situation doesn\u2019t change, then I think I really can\u2019t look forward to it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The participants are firmly aware of the heavy workload. Takeru has personally observed how this burden can negatively affect a teacher\u2019s family life. In the final phrase, Takeru mentions the urgency for change, but he nonetheless shows a lack of agency to alter the situation, adding to the dread that he feels.<\/p>\n

We have seen how hope and dread play out in the participants\u2019 lives and identities. Given this complexity in the lives and identities of pre-service teachers, it raises a question about how pre-service teachers are dealing with this tension in their teacher identities, which will be addressed in the next section. The language teacher identity construction process will be viewed from the lens of Gross\u2019 (2015) emotional regulation strategies.<\/p>\n

Identity Positioning from the Perspective of Gross\u2019 Model of Emotional Regulation<\/h4>\n

This section addresses research question 2. Emotions are an important aspect of identity (Barcelos, 2015; Nall & Mansouri, 2023). Regarding the emotionality of the teaching profession, King et al. (2020) stated:<\/p>\n

From joy to frustration, enthusiasm to boredom, fear to anger, teachers\u2019 emotional experiences shape not only their professional identities and classroom practices but also ultimately help to determine their length of service, being as they are intimately linked to teacher stress, burnout, and attrition (p. 288).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Since emotions are part of teacher identities, this necessitates the need for pre-service teachers to explore emotional regulation strategies as they construct their identities. The following findings will be presented in five sections according to Gross\u2019 (2015) process model of emotional regulation. It is our hope that in this section, we can show how the participants are positioning their identities by employing various emotional regulation strategies. Additionally, pre-service teachers experience both emotions as they are enrolled in teacher training programs and emotions in relation to speculation about their future lives. These two types of emotions can be both felt and be relevant to pre-service teachers and their identity development processes, and will be explored together in the following sections.<\/p>\n

Situation selection<\/strong>. Situation selection means \u201ctaking actions that make it more (or less) likely that one will be in a situation that one expects will give rise to desirable (or undesirable) emotions\u201d (Gross, 2015, p. 7). The participants\u2019 situation selection strategies originated in an appraisal of their own skills and abilities. Nana foresees having trouble forming meaningful relationships with students. She said, \u201cThe thing I lack the most is having spent a lot of time with children . . . I need to do volunteer work . . . and become used to being with them\u201d (Nana). Nana senses her own lack of experience and employs a situation selection strategy by showing a willingness to engage in activities that maximize the development of her interpersonal skills.<\/p>\n

Ryosuke illustrated two forms of situation selection when he said, \u201cI need to know more about the actual status of English education . . . I want to do my practical teaching, and I want to go abroad\u201d (Ryosuke). In this statement, he shows an awareness of his own lack of pedagogical knowledge and experience, as well as a lack of English proficiency (RNF2). He plans to overcome this by selecting situations where he is likely to benefit an English user and teacher. Takeru likewise felt that he had insufficient knowledge related to English education and therefore continued his education (i.e., selected his situation) in graduate school rather than entering the workforce after graduation (interview, TNF1).<\/p>\n

In these examples, one can see how participants employ situation selection strategies to increase knowledge and abilities in areas that they deem themselves to be lacking. Situation selection, therefore, is a common strategy utilized by the participants to position themselves in an advantageous manner for their future careers.<\/p>\n

Situation modification<\/strong>. Situation modification happens when one resorts to \u201ctaking actions that directly alter a situation in order to change its emotional impact\u201d (Gross, 2015, p. 8). This can take place by creating a \u2018new\u2019 situation out of something uncomfortable. Exercising agency is a necessary element in enacting this strategy.<\/p>\n

Situation modification was related to the participant\u2019s perceptions of their expected future careers that they find undesirable. Nana was aware of the teachers\u2019 heavy workload (interview, NNF2). When asked about how she would deal with this problem, she was unable to give a well-formulated response. She said, \u201cHow? . . . How? . . . I\u2019m not sure . . .\u201d (Nana). Takeru also could not employ situation modification strategies when he worried about teachers\u2019 non-teaching duties. In the interview, he said, \u201cIf I\u2019m speaking honestly, I don\u2019t really have the confidence to tackle those issues\u201d (Takeru). Ryosuke feared the possibility of being forced out of his career due to the pressure. He claimed that this is ingrained within the teaching profession in Japan, and he feels that he is helpless to change such a situation (interview, RNF3).<\/p>\n

When imagining their future careers, the participants showed an inability<\/em> to take action to facilitate situation modification. This seems to be an important defining feature of their language teacher identities.<\/p>\n

Attention deployment. <\/strong>Attention deployment is \u201cdirecting one\u2019s attention with the goal of influencing one\u2019s emotional response\u201d (Gross, 2015, p. 8). This strategy entails consciously manipulating one\u2019s attention to focus on a positive rather than a negative.<\/p>\n

Narrative frame 3 asked participants to imagine the job of an English teacher when the participants were around 50 years old. One issue that emerged had to do with artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on education. Nana wrote, \u201cTranslation apps will evolve, and we may not have to study English anymore\u201d (NNF3). Later, she said, \u201cI think that English as a subject may no longer be needed\u201d and that \u201cthe job of an English teacher may disappear\u201d (Nana). Takeru echoed this sentiment when he wondered whether \u201cwe [teachers] will be really needed or not\u201d (TNF3). Nana later illustrated attention deployment when she hesitantly said, \u201cI guess I\u2019m not that worried about it. Things will be OK, I think.\u201d Takeru rationalized his worries about the AI problem by claiming that \u201canyway, it\u2019s becoming more and more common to change your career\u201d (Takeru), shifting the focus of the discussion to the group of working professionals rather than on himself. Regarding the AI problem, Ryosuke said, \u201cIf it did come true, I don\u2019t know what I would do. All I can do is to think about it when it actually becomes a reality\u201d (Ryosuke). Nevertheless, Ryosuke feels \u201coptimism\u201d about the future of teaching because \u201chumanity has managed to get by so far\u201d (RNF3). This is one more example of attention deployment.<\/p>\n

Attention deployment is one strategy that the participants employ when confronting thoughts about uncomfortable future situations. This attention deployment may be little more than wishful thinking, but for the time being, it allows the participants to minimize negative emotions by simply shifting their attention away from looming problems.<\/p>\n

Cognitive change. <\/strong>Cognitive change is \u201cmodifying one\u2019s appraisal of a situation in order to alter its emotional impact\u201d (Gross, 2015, p. 9). In other words, one can deal with negative emotions by changing the way one thinks about an undesirable situation. The participants altered the way they thought about specific problems to reduce emotional strain. Takeru viewed the traditional teacher-student relationship as being psychologically distant. He felt that this limits his ability to form meaningful relationships with students and lessens his ability to help them. Illustrating cognitive change, he said, \u201cI really don\u2019t want the students to call me Sensei<\/em> [teacher]. I want that power relationship to be as equal as possible. I want to spend my time at the same level as the students\u201d (Takeru). Takeru is changing the way he thinks about the traditional teacher-student status hierarchy and relationship. He believes this will allow him to bypass the hierarchical teacher-student relationship and grant him social capital with the students, thereby being better socially positioned to help them.<\/p>\n

When considering his career, Ryosuke tackles the problems associated with long working hours and reveals a cognitive change strategy (RNF3). Ryosuke proclaimed:<\/p>\n

I <\/em>can\u2019t deal with those problems by myself. So, the team, or my grade, or as an entire school, we<\/em> have to deal with those problems . . . it\u2019s teamwork. We can\u2019t solve the problems alone (Ryosuke\u2019s interview).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ryosuke is employing cognitive change by thinking about them as \u2018our<\/em> problems\u2019 as a group of teachers rather than \u2018his<\/em> problems,\u2019 enabling him to lessen the personal emotional burden.<\/p>\n

Nana, on the other hand, worried that learning English may become unnecessary due to technological advancements. When pressed further, she came to recognize that technology would also \u201creduce the burden on teachers\u201d in other areas (NNF2), illustrating a cognitive change in the way she thinks about technology and its impact on teachers.<\/p>\n

Response modulation<\/strong>. Response modulation means \u201cdirectly influencing experiential, behavioral, or psychological components of the emotional response after the emotion is well developed\u201d (Gross, 2015, p. 9). This can include strategies that alter one\u2019s feeling state or influence one\u2019s physiological responses. For the participants, response modulation can occur following experienced emotions during pre-service training, but there is also a future element, as they imagine their future emotions and anticipate how they will cope. This future element of response modulation will be in focus here as it pertains to the development of their teacher identities.<\/p>\n

When faced with thoughts about prolonged teacher stress, Takeru claimed, \u201cI may resign at some point\u201d (TNF3). Quitting a strenuous profession is perhaps the most drastic way to employ response modulation. When probed further, he said:<\/p>\n

With my classmates, we often talk about plan B careers. The thing we often talk about is our first jobs, it is just to bear it and put up with it, and save money. Then when we\u2019re in our 30s or 40s we talk about using that money to start something new (Takeru).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Nana also echoed this sentiment when, in reference to the future AI problem, she said that she would consider a second career as a writer. Ryosuke stopped short of saying that he would leave the teaching profession. However, when confronted with the impact of future technologies on teaching, he said that \u201cthe job of a teacher will become a formality and lose its significance or existence\u201d (RNF3). It\u2019s possible to see how espousing such a belief might lead to a response modulation strategy like Takeru and Nana\u2019s. The participants imagined their future careers, identities, and emotions and employed hypothetical future response modulation in response to negative emotions in their imagined future careers.<\/p>\n

Discussion<\/h3>\n

The purpose of this study was to examine how pre-service teachers are situating their identities amongst Japanese values and belief systems regarding education in Japan and to assess how those pre-service teachers are coping with disrupted identities as they are approaching their future careers as K-12 English language teachers in Japan. The participants\u2019 identities incorporate deeply held emotions of hope and dread for their careers. What this means is that they are not stepping into the teaching profession enthusiastically and wholeheartedly. Due to teachers\u2019 overwork, the participants are not looking at the profession as a life-long career that allows them to perfect their skills, in addition to allowing them to construct fulfilling personal lives. The dread stands in the way of the construction of empowered teacher identities that will serve them throughout their careers (see Barkhuizen, 2017; De Costa & Norton, 2017; Hiratsuka, 2022; Kayi-Aydar, 2015; Kayi-Aydar et al., 2019; Robertson & Yazan, 2022). It is in this sense that we argue that pre-service teacher identities in this study are \u2018disrupted<\/em>.\u2019<\/p>\n

To address research question 1, the pre-service teachers are situating their identities within sociocultural values and belief systems (see Hiratsuka & Okuma, 2021; Olsen, 2008; Yazan & Lindahl, 2020) in a worrisome way. For one, teachers are respected and valued in Japanese society (see Tsujimura, 1991; Varkey Foundation, 2013, 2018), and the participants are embarking on careers in alignment with those values. On the other hand, it is widely known that teachers are overworked (see Hiratsuka, 2022; JTUC, 2016; OECD, 2018), but little real action has been taken to mitigate this situation. Aware of this, the pre-service teachers are averse to the teaching profession and feel helpless to remedy it. This contradiction in the way that pre-service teachers are situating their identities may result in two negative outcomes for their teacher identities. First, it may result in disengagement from the teaching profession (i.e., \u2018I am not a good teacher because I cannot handle all my duties\u2019). The three participants showed signs of early disengagement when they claimed that they don\u2019t want to do all the non-teaching work typically assigned to teachers (NNF2; RNF3; TNF3) and that they don\u2019t look forward to their careers because of the overwork (e.g., Nana\u2019s interview; Ryosuke\u2019s interview; Takeru\u2019s interview). Secondly, it may eventually result in dis-identification (i.e., \u2018teaching is not for me\u2019). The dis-identification from the teaching profession was made evident when they claimed they might eventually leave the teaching profession (TNF3; RNF3; Nana\u2019s interview; Takeru\u2019s interview; Ryosuke\u2019s interview) to pursue other, less strenuous careers. Both disengagement and dis-identification will likely have detrimental effects and may eventually lead to the participants themselves actually leaving the teaching profession altogether (see Trent, 2017). This situation does not serve the students, teachers, or the wider communities well.<\/p>\n

For the teaching profession in Japan, this complex situation means that there is a need to lessen the dread that pre-service teachers are experiencing so they can situate their identities more positively as they prepare to begin their careers. The pre-service teachers are affected by the knowledge of overwork gained from seniors and other in-service teachers. For one, they need to hear more stories about in-service teachers who have balanced and fulfilling professional and personal lives (see Hiratsuka, 2016; Hiratsuka & Barkhuizen, 2015). Additionally, administrators and policymakers need to implement and enforce meaningful changes in teachers\u2019 workloads. This may be done by hiring additional staff members to tackle the administrative tasks and extracurricular activities that teachers have overseen thus far. However, given the financial constraints that often characterize education, perhaps a more reasonable first step would be to reduce the burden of after-school programs by making them entirely voluntary for teachers or limiting the activities to a few months during the year. Schools could also enforce a much stiffer division of labor, limiting teaching duties to teachers, administration duties to administrators, and coaching to coaches.<\/p>\n

Gross\u2019 (2015) model of emotional regulation was chosen as the theoretical framework for research question 2 because emotions and identities are intertwined (Barcelos, 2015; Hiratsuka, 2023b), and Gross\u2019 model allows us, as researchers, to systematically view and understand the ways in which the pre-service teachers are positioning their identities by employing emotional regulation strategies (or not) in preparation for their careers. Emotional regulation strategies function as a form of proactive coping (Aspinwall & Taylor, 1997) and are, therefore, related to their identity positioning (see Morris & King, 2020). The participants in this study were able to exercise emotional regulation strategies to varying degrees, placing us, as researchers, in a position to identify important implications of the study and suggest directions for future research.<\/p>\n

Situation selection and cognitive change were two of Gross\u2019 (2015) emotional regulation strategies that the participants were able to effectively utilize in their identity positioning. The participants were able to sense their own deficiencies and employ emotional regulation effectively to manipulate their future emotions. For example, Nana and Ryosuke were able to self-identify their lack of social skills and linguistic proficiencies and were willing to put themselves in situations where those worries would be alleviated (Nana\u2019s interview, Ryosuke\u2019s interview). They did that to better prepare themselves for careers in teaching, thereby increasing the positive emotions experienced as in-service teachers. What this means for the teaching profession and pre-service teacher training programs in Japan is that pre-service teachers have a self-awareness of their skill sets and abilities and that they have a solid knowledge foundation about what the teaching profession entails for them. This suggests that current teacher training programs are doing a good job of communicating and demonstrating the basic duties and responsibilities of teachers to pre-service teachers and that there are programs and opportunities in place that help pre-service teachers gain the knowledge and experience that they deem necessary in forming their identities, placing them on a path toward successful careers.<\/p>\n

Gross\u2019 (2015) emotional regulation strategy of cogitative change also emerged as a positive force for pre-service teachers\u2019 identities. For example, Takeru wanted to change the way he and his future students thought about the teacher-student relationship (Takeru\u2019s interview), and Ryosuke believed he would be able to approach problems in future teaching environments by cognitively transforming them from \u2018his <\/em>problems\u2019 to \u2018our<\/em> problems\u2019 (Ryosuke\u2019s interview). Takeru\u2019s strategy of transforming the teacher-student relationship by abandoning formal titles shows us that he possesses the mental flexibility and fortitude to contradict and transcend the cultural values and beliefs within Japanese society\u2014values and beliefs that he viewed as holding back teachers\u2019 ability to help students. Ryosuke illustrated solidarity with colleagues when facing problems at work. This kind of collegial unity may form the basis of a powerful driving force in calling for and establishing meaningful change in the problematic work culture in Japan. If there is any hope for improving the lives of teachers, in-service and pre-service teacher training programs need to support and build on the development of emotional regulation strategies such as situation selection and cognitive change.<\/p>\n

In contrast, the participants were sometimes unable<\/em> to employ emotional regulation strategies successfully. When Nana imagined being overworked, she could not think of a way to employ situation modification to better the situation (Nana\u2019s interview). Takeru\u2019s and Ryosuke\u2019s comments also reflected this sentiment (Takeru\u2019s interview, Ryosuke\u2019s interview, RNF3), showing that the participants believed they would lack the future agency or ability to lessen their own workloads. This places them in a position of helplessness, and it appears that they can only rely on administrators and policymakers to change teachers\u2019 working conditions. To alleviate this situation, pre-service teachers need to be shown how others have successfully implemented situation modification strategies through the exercise of teacher agency in Japanese schools. This may be done by conducting qualitative research studies regarding situation modification strategies successfully employed by teachers in Japan and introducing them as part of the regular teacher training curricula. Additionally, rather than merely assessing teacher stress (e.g., JTUC, 2016; OECD, 2018), administrators and policymakers in Japan need to take immediate action that would reduce the workloads of teachers and give teachers some agency or ability to control at least part of their work duties and tasks.<\/p>\n

A third category of emotional regulation strategies also emerged. These are what we call the neither-nor strategies, as the pre-service teachers are neither facing the challenges directly nor taking any direct action to avoid them. Attention deployment was utilized by the participants when they considered the potential problems that AI and translation technology posed to the future of foreign language education (NNF3, TNF3, RNF3, Takeru\u2019s interview, Ryosuke\u2019s interview). The participants simply took the position of \u2018I\u2019ll worry about that problem when we get there.\u2019 For the moment, they may find at least an avoidance of negative emotions. However, this strategy only postpones such problems and emotional struggles to be dealt with later. The participants may be doing this because they are not well informed about the problem or because they simply don\u2019t know what to do otherwise. Technological advancements and AI are already disrupting certain labor sectors and industries, and the intersection between technology and education is becoming more evident every day. Teacher training programs can better serve students by providing pre-service teachers with the opportunities to learn about current technological advances that are directly related to language education and exposing students to critical thinking exercises that target how they might tackle future changes in education, as well as how they might negotiate their identities to incorporate new and emergent technologies into their teaching.<\/p>\n

Another neither-nor strategy that was particularly worrisome involved response modulation, emerging from the participants\u2019 thoughts about plan B careers (TNF3, Takeru\u2019s interview, Nana\u2019s interview, Ryosuke\u2019s interview). The fact that pre-service teachers are already thinking about second careers is particularly telling for the teaching profession in Japan. Quitting the teaching profession to pursue a less strenuous vocation would likely alleviate stress and negative emotions, but it nonetheless avoids directly dealing with the problems that teachers face. This suggests that the problem of teacher attrition needs to be given more serious attention in academic circles and among policymakers and administrators in Japan.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n

The current study addressed how three pre-service teachers and their identities are positioned within Japanese values and belief systems. The participants\u2019 identities are conflicted, comprising both strong emotions of fear and dread. We have also described and interpreted the emotional regulation strategies employed by the participants in accordance with Gross\u2019 (2015) process model of emotional regulation. Gross\u2019 (2015) process model of emotional regulation can be viewed as a tool for understanding and analyzing how pre-service teachers are emotionally pro-actively coping (or not) as they approach careers in teaching, which they view as being strenuous and stressful yet rewarding. Since the emotional regulation strategies were exercised at varying levels, this hints at implications and directions for future research.<\/p>\n

Language teacher educators and researchers can benefit from the current study by having a raised awareness of some of the identity-related issues that pre-service teachers encounter and by being consciously aware of the ways that pre-service teachers are employing emotional regulation strategies while they are enrolled in language teacher training programs. Much attention needs to be paid to areas where the participants struggled, for example, with the development of situation modification strategies. Language teacher educators could modify their pedagogies to help their students more appropriately prepare for their future careers by incorporating activities that require pre-service teachers to think critically about the challenges they are likely to face in the future and about how those challenges can be effectively addressed, and how it might affect their identities as language teachers (see Fanselow & Hiratsuka, 2019). Situation modification skills and language teacher agency seem to be other areas that need to be the focus of more research in Japan. As the pre-service teachers in this study worry about their future teacher agency and their ability to modify difficult situations in their work environments, it seems that researchers need to make an endeavor to uncover how in-service teachers can or cannot exercise their professional agencies and modify their working situations to be more conducive to life-long resilient careers in Japan. An effort should also be made to raise awareness among policymakers and administrators regarding the growing need for meaningful change in teachers\u2019 working conditions. Likewise, research studies that target pre-service teachers\u2019 response modulation and beliefs about plan B careers could also be informative in teacher training programs, as well as for policymakers and administrators.<\/p>\n

The current study is not without its limitations. This study included a small number of participants. However, an effort was made for triangulation in terms of data collection methods (i.e., narrative frames and interviews) and participants (i.e., pre-service teachers hoping to work at three different educational levels), and we believe that the findings are transferrable to other individuals who find themselves in similar situations to the pre-service teachers in the present study. Future studies could include a larger number of participants from a wide variety of backgrounds (e.g., non-Japanese pre-service teachers).<\/p>\n

About the Authors<\/h3>\n

Matthew Nall<\/strong> is an Assistant Professor at Miyagi University, and a doctoral candidate at Ryukoku University, Japan. His research focuses on pre-service language teacher identity. ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4348-1954<\/p>\n

Takaaki<\/strong> Hiratsuka<\/strong> is a Professor of Applied Linguistics at Ryukoku University in Kyoto, Japan, where he supervises master\u2019s and PhD students, both Japanese and non-Japanese, in related fields of language teacher education and narrative inquiry. His recent book publications include Narrative inquiry into language teacher identity: ALTs in the JET program<\/em>\u00a0(2022, Routledge), Team teachers in Japan: Beliefs, identities, and emotions<\/em> (2023, Routledge), and Native-speakerism and trans-speakerism: Entering a new era\u00a0<\/em>(in press, Cambridge University Press). ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3817-6656.<\/p>\n

To Cite this Article<\/h3>\n

Nall, M. & Hiratsuka, T. (2024). A future of hope and dread: How K-12 pre-service language teachers are situating their identities within modern Japanese value and belief systems. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 2<\/em>8(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.55593\/ej.28109s1<\/p>\n

References<\/h3>\n

Araki, S., & Iwasaki, K. (2005). Death due to overwork (karoshi): Causation, health service, and life expectancy of Japanese males. Journal of the Medical Association of Japan, 48<\/em>(2), 92\u201398. https:\/\/citeseerx.ist.psu.edu\/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=3fa4547913a00ac4aa4ff92a4ad04c11d8333ca9<\/a><\/p>\n

Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121<\/em>(3), 417\u2013436. https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/doi\/10.1037\/0033-2909.121.3.417<\/a><\/p>\n

Barcelos, A. M. F. (2015). Unveiling the relationship between language learning beliefs, emotions, and identities. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5<\/em>(2), 301\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14746\/ssllt.2015.5.2.6<\/a><\/p>\n

Barkhuizen, G. (2014). Revisiting narrative frames: An instrument for investigating language teaching learning. System, 47<\/em>, 12\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.system.2014.09.014<\/a><\/p>\n

Barkhuizen, G. (2017). Reflections on language teacher identity research<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36<\/em>(3), 372\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.system.2008.02.002<\/a><\/p>\n

Benesch, S. (2012). Considering emotions in critical English language teaching: Theories and praxis<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Benesch, S. (2017). Emotions and English language teaching: Exploring teachers\u2019 emotion labor<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Bunyarat, P., & Tuptim, N. (2023). The semantic change of the English color terms BLACK and WHITE in Japanese. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13<\/em>(2), 516\u2013524. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17507\/tpls.1302.29<\/a><\/p>\n

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory <\/em>(2nd ed.). Sage Publications.<\/p>\n

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory<\/em>. Sage.<\/p>\n

De Costa, P. I., & Norton, B. (2017). Introduction: Identity, transdisciplinarity, and the good language teacher. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 3-14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/modl.12368<\/a><\/p>\n

Esteve, J. M. (1994). El malestar docente<\/em> [Teacher discomfort]. Padi\u00f3s.<\/p>\n

Fan, F., & de Jong, E. J. (2019). Exploring professional identities of nonnative English-speaking teachers in the United States: A narrative case study. TESOL Journal, 10<\/em>(4). Advance online publication. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/tesj.495<\/a><\/p>\n

Fanselow, J., & Hiratsuka, T. (2019). Suggestions for teacher educators from a gentle iconoclast and a fellow explorer. In S. Walsh & S. Mann (Eds.), Routledge handbook of English language teacher education <\/em>(pp. 96\u2013108). Routledge.<\/p>\n

Glasgow, G. P. (2014). Teaching English in English, \u2018in principle\u2019: The national foreign language curriculum for Japanese senior high schools. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 9<\/em>(2), 152\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/18334105.2014.11082028<\/a><\/p>\n

Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26<\/em>(1), 1\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1047840X.2014.940781<\/a><\/p>\n

Gross, J. J., Sheppes, G., & Urry, H. L. (2011). Emotion generation and emotion regulation: A distinction we should make (carefully). Cognition and Emotions, 25<\/em>, 765\u2013781. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02699931.2011.555753<\/a><\/p>\n

Gu, M., & Benson, P. (2015). The formation of English teacher identities: A cross-cultural investigation. Language Teaching Research, 19<\/em>(2), 187\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1362168814541725<\/a><\/p>\n

Hiratsuka, T. (2014). A study into how high school students learn using narrative frames. ELT Journal, 68<\/em>(2), 169\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/elt\/cct096 <\/a><\/p>\n

Hiratsuka, T. (2016). Actualizing Exploratory Practice (EP) principles with team teachers in Japan. System, 57<\/em>, 109\u2013119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.system.2016.01.004 <\/a><\/p>\n

Hiratsuka, T. (2018). Narrative frames as a course evaluation instrument. The Language Teacher, 42<\/em>(1), 3\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37546\/jalttlt42.1-1 <\/a><\/p>\n

Hiratsuka, T. (2022). Narrative inquiry into language teacher identity: ALTs in the JET program<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Hiratsuka, T. (2023a). Professional identities of local Japanese teachers of English (JTEs) vis-\u00e0-vis their foreign assistant language teachers (ALTs). Journal of Language, Identity & Education<\/em>. Advance online publication. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15348458.2023.2282692<\/a><\/p>\n

Hiratsuka, T. (Ed.). (2023b). Team teachers in Japan: Beliefs, identities, and emotions<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Hiratsuka, T., & Barkhuizen, G. (2015). Effects of Exploratory Practice (EP) on team teachers\u2019 perceptions in Japanese high schools. JALT Journal, 37<\/em>(1), 5\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37546\/jaltjj37.1-1 <\/a><\/p>\n

Hiratsuka, T., & Okuma, K. (2021). \u201cI can teach alone!\u201d: Perceptions of pre-service teachers on team-teaching practices. The Language Teacher, 45<\/em>(3), 11\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37546\/jalttlt45.3-2<\/a><\/p>\n

Huang, J., & Brown, K. (2009). Cultural factors affecting Chinese ESL students\u2019 academic learning. Education, 129<\/em>(4), 643\u2013653. https:\/\/eric.ed.gov\/?id=EJ871615<\/a><\/p>\n

Ikeda, M., Imai, H., & Takeuchi, O. (2019). An innovative approach to in-service teacher training for teaching English at Japanese public elementary schools. In H. Reinders, S. Ryan, & S. Nakamura (Eds.), Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching: The case of Japan<\/em> (pp. 42\u201357). Palgrave Macmillan.<\/p>\n

Ikeda, M., Takeuchi, O., & Imai, H. (2020). Investigating dynamic changes in elementary school teachers\u2019 anxiety when teaching English. In C. Gkonou, J. M. Dewaele, & J. King (Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching <\/em>(pp. 173\u2013192). Multilingual Matters.<\/p>\n

Japan Today (February 4th<\/sup>, 2024). Number of teachers on leave for mental illness in Japan hits record high<\/em>. https:\/\/www.japantimes.co.jp\/news\/2024\/02\/03\/japan\/teachers-mental-health-leave\/#:~:text=Feb%203%2C%202024-,The%20number%20of%20teachers%20who%20took%20leave%20due%20to%20mental,cited%20as%20a%20possible%20factor.<\/a><\/p>\n

Japanese Trade Union Confederation [JTUC]: Research Institute for Advancement of Living Standards (2016). Get it back! Faculty members\u2019 \u201cliving time\u201d \u2013 Research committee report on the actual work and working hours of faculty and staff in Japan [in Japanese]. National Institute for Lifestyle Development<\/em>, 101\u2013141. https:\/\/www.rengo-soken.or.jp\/work\/bcf009507f36983a485217ed230437e742fb5082.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Jiang, L., Yuan, K., & Yu, S. (2021). Transitioning from pre-service to novice: A study on Macau EFL teachers\u2019 identity change. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30<\/em>(1), 11\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40299-020-00510-4<\/a><\/p>\n

Kanno, Y., & Stuart, C. (2011). Learning to become a second language teacher: Identities-in-practice. The Modern Language Journal, 95<\/em>(2), 236\u2013252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-4781.2011.01178.x<\/a><\/p>\n

Kayi-Aydar, H. (2015). Teacher agency, positioning, and English language learners: Voices of pre-service classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45<\/em>, 94\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tate.2014.09.009<\/a><\/p>\n

Kayi-Aydar, H., Gao, X. A., Miller, E. R., Varghese, M., & Vitanova, G. (2019). Theorizing and analyzing language teacher agency<\/em>. Multilingual Matters.<\/p>\n

King, J., Dewaele, J. M., & Gkonou, C. (2020). Concluding thoughts on the emotional rollercoaster of language teaching. In C. Gkonou, J. M. Dewaele, & J. King (Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching <\/em>(pp. 288\u2013295). Multilingual Matters.<\/p>\n

Kuwato, M., & Hirano, Y. (2020). Sense of coherence, occupational stressors, and mental health among Japanese high school teachers in Nagasaki prefecture: A multiple regression analysis. BMC Public Health, 20<\/em>, Article 1355.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12889-020-09475-x<\/a><\/p>\n

Lindahl, K., & Yazan, B. (2019). An identity-oriented lens to TESOL teachers\u2019 lives: Introducing the special issue. TESOL Journal, 10<\/em>(4), 1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/tesj.506<\/a><\/p>\n

Mack, O., Kr\u00e4mer, A. K. A., & Burgartz, T. (2016). Managing in a VUCA World<\/em>. Springer.<\/p>\n

Markova, V., & Rogers, T. (2004). English language teaching: The case of Japan<\/em>. Lincom.<\/p>\n

McVeigh, B. J. (2002). Japanese higher education as myth<\/em>. M. E. Sharpe.<\/p>\n

Morris, S., & King, J. (2020). Emotion regulation among university EFL teachers in Japan: The dynamic interplay between context and emotional behaviour. In C. Gkonou, J. M. Dewaele, & J. King (Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching<\/em> (pp. 193\u2013210). Multilingual Matters.<\/p>\n

Nagamine, T. (2015). Why have English education reforms been unsuccessfully implemented in Japan? <\/em>Paper presented at the 8th<\/sup> Meeting of the JACET SIG Language Teacher Cognition Research, Tokyo, Japan.<\/p>\n

Nagamine, T. (2018). L2 teachers\u2019 professional burnout and emotional stress: Facing frustration and demotivation toward one\u2019s profession in a Japanese EFL context. In J. D. D. M. Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching: Theory, research and teacher education<\/em> (pp. 259\u2013275). Springer.<\/p>\n

Nall, M. (2021). Language teacher identity: Historical perspectives, philosophical frameworks, and research directions for Japan. Miyagi University Research Journal, 1(1), 88-98.<\/em> https:\/\/myu.repo.nii.ac.jp\/records\/717<\/a><\/p>\n

Nall, M., & Mansouri, B. (2023). Exploring the role of emotion in ALTs\u2019 professional identity construction in Japan: An ecological perspective. In T. Hiratsuka (Ed.), Team teachers in Japan: Beliefs, identities, and emotions<\/em> (pp. 94\u2013105). Routledge.<\/p>\n

Nazari, M., De Costa, P. I., & Karimpour, S. (2023). Novice language teacher identity construction: Similarities, differences, and beyond. Educational Linguistics, 2<\/em>(1), 1\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/eduling-2022-0013<\/a><\/p>\n

Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation <\/em>(2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.<\/p>\n

Olsen, B. (2008). How reasons for entry into the profession illuminate teacher identity development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35<\/em>(3), 23\u201340. https:\/\/files.eric.ed.gov\/fulltext\/EJ831706.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2018). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume 1): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners and valued professionals<\/em>. OECD Publishing. https:\/\/www.oecd.org\/education\/talis-2018-results-volume-i-1d0bc92a-en.htm<\/a><\/p>\n

Pugach, M. C., Gomez-Najarro, J., & Matewos, A. M. (2019). A review of identity in research on social justice in teacher education: What role for intersectionality? Journal of Teacher Education, 70<\/em>(3), 206\u2013218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022487118760567<\/a><\/p>\n

Robertson, W. B., & Yazan, B. (2022). Navigating tensions and asserting agency in language teacher identity: A case study of a graduate teaching assistant. Linguistics and Education, 71<\/em>, Article 101079. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.linged.2022.101079<\/a><\/p>\n

Ryan, S. (2009). Ambivalence and commitment, liberation and challenge: Investigating the attitudes of young Japanese people towards the learning of English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30<\/em>(5), 405\u2013420. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01434630902928447<\/a><\/p>\n

Song, J. (2016). Emotions and language teacher identity: Conflicts, vulnerability and transformation. TESOL Quarterly, 50<\/em>(3), 631\u2013652. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/tesq.312<\/a><\/p>\n

Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities<\/em>. John Wiley & Sons.<\/p>\n

Takahashi, M. (2019). Sociomedical problems of overwork-related deaths and disorders in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health, 61<\/em>(4), 269\u2013277. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1348-9585.12016<\/a><\/p>\n

The Japan Times (August 15th<\/sup>, 2023). Record number of teachers quit for mental health reasons in 2021<\/em>. https:\/\/www.japantimes.co.jp\/japan\/2023\/08\/15\/society\/record-number-of-teachers-quit-for-mental-health-reasons-in-2021\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Thompson, G., & Yanagita, M. (2017). Backward yakudoku: An attempt to implement CLT at a Japanese high school. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11<\/em>(2), 177\u2013187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17501229.2015.1088856<\/a><\/p>\n

Trent, J. (2017). Discourse, agency and teacher attrition: Exploring stories to leave by amongst former early career English language teachers in Hong Kong. Research Papers in Education, 32<\/em>(1), 84\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02671522.2016.1144215<\/a><\/p>\n

Tsui, A. B. M. (2011). Teacher education and teacher development. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning<\/em> (vol. 2, pp. 21\u201339). Routledge.<\/p>\n

Tsujimura, T. (1991). Keigo no yo\u0304ho\u0304<\/em> [The use of keigo]. Kakukawa Shoten.<\/p>\n

Ushioda, E. (2013). Foreign language motivation research in Japan: An \u2018insider\u2019 perspective from outside Japan. In M. T. Apple, D. Da Silva, & T. Fellner (Eds.), Language Learning Motivation in Japan <\/em>(pp. 1\u201313). Multilingual Matters.<\/p>\n

Varkey Foundation (2013). Global Teacher Status: Index 2013<\/em>. https:\/\/www.varkeyfoundation.org\/media\/2787\/2013globalteacherstatusindex.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Varkey Foundation (2018). Global Teacher Status: Index 2018<\/em>. https:\/\/www.varkeyfoundation.org\/what-we-do\/research\/global-teacher-status-index-2018<\/a><\/p>\n

Wen, W. P., & Clem\u00e9nt, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture & Curriculum, 16<\/em>(1), 18\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07908310308666654<\/a><\/p>\n

Wolff, D., & De Costa, P. I., (2017). Expanding the language teacher identity landscape: An investigation of the emotions and strategies of a NNEST. The Modern Language Journal, 101<\/em>(S1), 76\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/modl.12370<\/a><\/p>\n

Yazan, B. (2017). \u201cIt just made me look at language in a different way\u201d: ESOL teacher candidates\u2019 identity negotiation through teacher education coursework. Linguistics and Education, 40<\/em>, 38\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.linged.2017.06.002<\/a><\/p>\n

Yazan, B., & Lindahl, K. (Eds.) (2020). Language teacher identity in TESOL: Teacher education and practice as identity work<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

Appendix A<\/h3>\n

Narrative Frames<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Narrative Frame 1: Participants\u2019 personal narratives and future career<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1. My ideal future job\/career is \u00a0(\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2. This is because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3. Right now I am working toward this goal by (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4. I am excited about my future career because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5. I hope to maintain excitement about my future career by (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6. I am a little worried about my future career because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7. I hope to overcome worries about my future career by (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8. Describe yourself as a pre-service teacher (a student who is studying to become a teacher) today. How do you feel about your studies? How do you see yourself as a student? How do you think others see you? (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9. Imagine yourself working as a teacher in the year 2050. Describe yourself as a teacher. How do you feel? How do you see yourself as a teacher? How do you think others see you?\u00a0(\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Narrative Frame 2: Participants\u2019 narratives concerning education in the future<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1. I think that in general school\/learning environments in the year 2050 will be different than today. For example (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2. This change is likely to occur because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3. I think this because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4. When I imagine a teacher\u2019s job in the year 2050, one of the things I\u2019m most concerned about is (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5. I think this because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6. When I imagine a teacher\u2019s job in the year 2050, one of things I\u2019m most concerned about is\u00a0 (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7. I think this because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
When I think about education in general in the year 2050, the strongest emotion that I feel is (joy, enthusiasm, inspiration, optimism, frustration, boredom, fear, anger, other)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8. If you chose \u201cother\u201d in the above question, which is the strongest emotion that you feel? (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9. I feel this way probably because\u00a0 (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Narrative Frame 3: Participants\u2019 narratives about English\/foreign language education in the year 2050<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1. Imagine English as a second\/foreign language education in the year 2050. Some changes in the way we learn\/teach languages are likely to occur. For example (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2. As a language teacher, I hope to adapt to such changes by (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3. Skills that will help me when I need to adapt or learn new things as a teacher in 2050 are (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000 )<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4. I think this because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000 )<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5. When I think about my future career, specifically in the year 2050, the strongest emotion that I feel is (joy, enthusiasm, inspiration, optimism, frustration, boredom, fear, anger, other)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6. If you chose “other” in the above question, which is the strongest emotion that you feel?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7. This is probably because (\u3000\u3000\u3000\u3000)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[back to article<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Appendix B<\/h3>\n

Semi-structured interview questions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Can you tell me a little bit about your life story?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Why did you decide to become an English teacher?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
In your own words, what is the job of a teacher?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
In the future, what kind of teacher do you think you\u2019ll be?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
What roles do you look forward to most in being a teacher?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
What is your idea of an ideal teacher?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
In the future, what challenges do you think you will encounter as a teacher?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
What do you think your future students will think about you and your teaching?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Can you tell me about the things you are learning about teaching?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Are you supportive or critical of the current educational system in Japan?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[back to article<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Appendix C<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Data Analysis Code<\/td>\nCode Meaning<\/td>\nExample from the data set<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hope<\/td>\nParticipant displays feeling of hope for their future career<\/td>\n\u201cI realized how much fun it could be to teach English, and I really admired my teachers\u201d (Nana)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dread<\/td>\nParticipant displays feeling of dread toward their future career<\/td>\n\u201cIf the situation doesn\u2019t change, then I think I really can\u2019t look forward to it\u201d (Takeru)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
S.S.S.<\/td>\nSituation Selection Strategy<\/td>\n\u201cI want to do my practical teaching, and I want to go abroad\u201d (Ryosuke)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
S.M.S.<\/td>\nSituation Modification Strategy<\/td>\nInterviewer: \u201cSo how will you deal with those difficulties?\u201d
\nNana: \u201cHow? . . . I\u2019m not sure\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
A.D.S.<\/td>\nAttention Deployment Strategy<\/td>\n\u201cI guess I\u2019m not that worried about it. Things will be OK, I think\u201d (Nana)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
C.C.S.<\/td>\nCognitive Change Strategy<\/td>\n\u201cI really don\u2019t want the students to call me sensei<\/em> [teacher]. I want that power relationship to be as equal as possible\u201d (Takeru)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
R.M.S.<\/td>\nResponse Modulation Strategy<\/td>\n\u201cI may resign at some point\u201d (Takeru)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[back to article<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Copyright of articles rests with the authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
\nEditor\u2019s Note:<\/strong> The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version<\/a> of this article for citations.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

May 2024 – Volume 28, Number 1 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.55593\/ej.28109s1 Matthew Nall Miyagi University, Japan <matthewgarynallgmail.com> Takaaki Hiratsuka Ryukoku University, Japan <takaakihiratsukagmail.com> Abstract The current study is located among the body of language teacher identity research by focusing on the identities of pre-service language teachers in Japan. This study looks at how pre-service language teacher identities are […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":21222,"menu_order":11,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-21423","page","type-page","status-publish","entry"],"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21423"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21423\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21444,"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21423\/revisions\/21444"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tesl-ej.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}