• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Working Collaboratively in Second/Foreign Language Learning

May 2023 – Volume 27, Number 1

https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27105r1

Working Collaboratively in Second/Foreign Language Learning

Authors: María del Pilar García Mayo (Ed.) (2021) book cover
Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
Pages ISBN-13 Price
Pp. X + 277 978-1-5015-1731-0 (paper) $118.99 U.S.

The last two decades have witnessed a noticeable development in collaborative learning research. Informed by both cognitive-interactionist theory (Long 1983, 1996) and sociocultural theory (Vygotsky 1978), a large body of literature (e.g., Loewen & Sato, 2018; Sato & Ballinger, 2016; Swain & Lapkin, 2001) has demonstrated a robust connection between collaborative work and second language acquisition. In particular, peer collaboration is believed to serve as a facilitator of language production, and therefore it creates more opportunities for language learning. Based on this notion, researchers are branching out in new directions to investigate various aspects of collaboration in diverse learning contexts. The volume Working Collaboratively in Second/Foreign Language Learning edited by María del Pilar García Mayo, is a collection of studies documenting those explorations into collaborative work in second and foreign language learning.

The book contains ten chapters that can be broadly categorized into three themes. Chapters 1, 3, and 6 are presented under the theme of how EFL learners collaborate to use language and what factors motivate or demotivate learners’ participation in various collaborative tasks. The first chapter by Neomy Storch offers a critical review of collaborative writing research over the past two decades and focuses on learners’ sense of ownership which has received little attention before. How individual and collective ownership is related to different patterns of interaction and manifested is discussed in detail during face-to-face (FTF) and web-based collaborative writing activities. Participants involved in Chapter 3 are the under-researched adolescent learners in the mixed-age (MA) classroom. Tomas Kos explores MA pairs’ degree of mutuality in collaboration and its relationship with actual learning opportunities measured by language-related episodes (LRE). The study presented in Chapter 6 is the first to investigate the patterns of interaction formed in blended collaborative writing activities (FTF and online— via Google Docs). Five distinct patterns of interaction are identified; in most groups, the patterns are dynamic across modes. What’s more, the mode has an influence on the quantity as well as the resolution of LREs.

Besides the influencing factors, Chapters 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8 turn to examine how collaborative work affects language learning. In terms of developing grammatical knowledge, the research synthesis presented in Chapter 2 shows most previous studies have failed to demonstrate the advantage of collaborative form-focused tasks statistically. It is claimed that more studies are needed to verify collaborative tasks’ efficacy to assist grammatical forms acquisition. How collaborative work influences young learners’ written text quality is investigated in both Chapters 4 and 7. Chapter 4 finds that learners in groups created more LREs than pairs, while pairs successfully resolved outcomes of LREs more often than groups for each type of episode. Additionally, writing in pairs could improve fluency, while writing in groups led to better lexical, grammar, and global scores. Besides, most participants take a positive attitude towards collaborative writing.

Chapter 7 continues to explore these themes by observing how the mode of collaborative writing (on paper vs. in Google docs) affects secondary school students’ written text quality. According to the findings, in general, paper-based writing has better quality except for fluency and adequacy. The researchers believe the study could yield some insights for classroom practice; moreover, teachers and students should be trained to improve their awareness of technological affordances. Chapter 8 is about how text-based online interaction facilitates L2 Spanish learners’ pragmatic development, specifically the change in the way participants produce their closing sequences. Employing conversation analysis (CA) to analyze six weeks of interaction, the researcher discovers that technology-mediated tasks could promote L2 speakers’ telecollaborative engagement, improve their usage of closing sequence, and offer them a chance to exchange with native speakers. This study could provide insights into research on longitudinal interactional practices using CA. A small-scale qualitative study presented in Chapter 5 discovers that collaborative writing experience can lead to learners’ reduction of dictionary use and increased preference for intuitive solutions and reasoning during individual writing.

Last but not least, the studies presented in Chapters 9 and 10 are centered around ESL students, drawing on the framework of activity theory to analyze web-based collaborative writing activity. Chapter 9 illustrates how the interconnected components within the activity system constrain or afford students’ performance in collaborative wiki writing. Chapter 10 examines the interaction patterns as well as factors mediating peer interaction during collaborative writing activities via Google Docs. In addition to the participant goal, another five mediating factors (modes of communication, matching between self and other-perceived roles, perception about co-ownership, task representation, and task familiarity) are identified and analyzed within the framework of activity theory.

Undoubtedly, this volume contributes to expanding the empirical basis of collaboration research. Specifically speaking, the research projects collected in the volume were conducted in several countries (e.g., Spain, Germany, Indonesia) and target different second or foreign languages (e.g., German, Spanish). Moreover, in some chapters, researchers studied peer interaction among young adolescent learners (e.g., in Chapters 4 & 7) or mixed-age learners (e.g., in Chapter 3) who are generally an under-researched group in collaboration studies. Considering the wide application of technology tools in language learning, this volume has outlined the benefits and drawbacks of different types of computer-mediated peer collaboration in addition to face-to-face collaboration (e.g., computer-mediated synchronous interaction, a combination of F2F interaction and asynchronous online interaction). What’s more, in some chapters (such as Chapters 3, 5, 6, and 8), tasks used for data elicitation were adopted from the course design or common classroom lessons, which presents an ideal link between language teaching practice and research.

Despite all these strengths, this volume has shortcomings. First, though the findings are enlightening, several chapters based on quantitative analysis have a small sample size (e.g., in Chapters 3, 4, and 7), which limit the generalizability of findings to wider populations. Second, the technology involved in the collaboration research of this volume, namely Google Docs and Wiki-based platforms, is confined to computer-mediated communication modes. Future investigations could benefit from exploiting new technologies such as artificial intelligence and extended reality in learners’ collaboration research. Third, even if the volume advances our understanding of text-based interaction involved in the process of collaborative writing, which is the specific form of collaboration in most chapters, readers could gain more insight into learners’ collaborative work if more oral interaction research were included.

To sum up, credit should be given to García Mayo for collecting a wide scope of empirical studies demonstrating how learners work collaboratively to use a second or foreign language in diverse learning environments. As such, this book is recommended to language teachers, early career and experienced researchers, and graduate students who are interested in gaining an in-depth understanding of the role of learners’ collaborative work in language learning.

To Cite this Review

Yang, Shaobo (2023). [Review of the book Working Collaboratively in Second/Foreign Language Learning, by M. García Mayo (Ed.)]. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27105r1

References

Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285-329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125

Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.

Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp.1-30). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.01int

Swain M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). Longman.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

About the reviewer

Shaobo Yang is a lecturer in the School of Foreign Languages of Civil Aviation University of China. Her research interest primarily lies in instructed second language acquisition. ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8126-7863, yangshaobocaucatmark163.com

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.