• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Grammar Dimensions: Form, Meaning, and Use: Book Four

June 1995 — Volume 1, Number 4

Grammar Dimensions: Form, Meaning, and Use: Book Four

Jan Frodesen and Janet Eyring (1993)
Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers
ISBN 0-8384-397-13 (paper)
US $18.00

Grammar Dimensions: Book Four is the last text in a four-part series that attempts to provide learners with an understanding of the interdependence between grammar and communication. Three primary aspects of grammar are considered: meaning, form, and use. This approach to grammar encourages meaningful and appropriate use of structures. Each text in the series may be used independently. However, grammar structures such as the passive are recycled throughout the four texts with increasing levels of complexity.

Each structure is introduced in a meaningful context while communicative interactions are provided to serve as culminating activities that tie meaning, form and use together. The series editor, Diane Larsen-Freeman, describes the philosophy behind the text when she suggests that “grammar might be better thought of as a skill, rather than as an area of knowledge” (p. xvii).

Grammar Dimensions: Book Four, for advanced learners, is concerned with grammatical structures considered necessary in technical/academic reading and writing. Topics include articles, relative adverbials, complex passives, modals, and preposition clusters.

Units open with Tasks that serve as diagnostic tests. Following the Tasks, Focus Boxes highlight various aspects of the grammatical topic: meaning, form and/or use. Each Focus Box is accompanied by one or more exercises. Finally, each unit closes with a set of activities that emphasizes the communicative importance of grammar. In addition, the activities may serve as post-tests.

Unit Five, Stative Passives, begins with a Task that requires the learners to read about a drivetrain of the kind found on any typical automobile. After the reading, the learners are to complete a chart by identifying various parts of the drivetrain. Here the stative passive is introduced in a meaningful context. Next, Focus One, Review of Passive Verb Forms, focuses on form. The similarity in form between dynamic and stative passives is explained as well as charted. Exercise One asks the learners to list all of the passive verbs from the paragraph about the drivetrain.

Focus Two, Stative Passive in Contrast to Dynamic Passive, explains through examples the differences in usage between stative and dynamic passives. In Exercise Two, learners are asked to identify each passive in the drivetrain paragraph as either stative or dynamic. In Exercise Three, agents are re-introduced and learners are to attempt to add agents to both the stative and dynamic [-1-] passives in Exercise Two. Here the “hypothesized” rule in Focus Two, “dynamics express action while statives express states or conditions,” is supported. In addition, learners are required in Exercise Three to change each passive in the chart from its present to past tense form. Learners are then asked to state a general rule about the tense of stative verbs.

In Focus Three, Adjective Participles in Contrast to Stative Passives, form and meaning are considered as learners read that the forms are similar, yet the meanings are different. Adjective participles express feelings and can be modified by the intensifier very. Exercise Four then asks learners to compare the tenses found in statives and adjective participles. Once learners deduce a rule, they are to test it on the example sentences in Focus Two and Focus Three. Exercise Five then asks learners to identify statives and adjective participles in an example paragraph.

The use of statives is then expanded; Focus Four, Common Rhetorical Functions of Stative Passives, explains the various descriptive purposes of statives. Learners then identify the descriptive purpose of each stative in Exercise Six. Exercise Seven consists of matching words or phrases from one column with phrases in another column that relate rhetorically. After matching, learners produce sentences from the matched pairs by supplying stative verbs.

The final Focus Box, Focus Five, Stative Passives in Relative Clauses, again considers form. Exercise Eight involves correcting sentences which contain relative clauses that have stative passive forms. Exercise Nine requires learners to edit a paragraph. Finally, the unit concludes with a series of activities ranging from student- produced exercises for peers to the creation of a trivial pursuit game.

The text probably contains too much information to be covered in one course (e.g. a quarter or semester), but instructors need not feel compelled to complete the entire text. Approximately four to five hours of instruction are required for each unit, and the text contains twenty-six units. An instructor’s manual and a student workbook which focuses on TOEFL preparation are also available. In the case of Unit Five, Stative Verbs, the workbook offers more practice in the form of five exercises which range from identifying examples of statives in an essay to describing in one’s own words the functions of each example given.

Besides being utilized as the main textbook for a course, Grammar Dimensions may also be employed as a resource to which instructors can turn once they have identified the needs of their learners. I highly recommend Grammar Dimensions: Book Four, as it addresses grammar through meaningful contexts as well as through “rule-hypothesis” formation and testing. Moreover, meaning, form, [-2-] and use are treated explicitly and through communicative, culminating activities.

Jerry Call
Ohio University
<jc111287@oak.cats.ohiou.edu>

[-3-]

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page in the paginated ASCII version of this article, which is the definitive edition. Please use these page numbers when citing this work.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.