• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Considering Emotions in Critical English Language Teaching: Theories and Praxis

February 2014 – Volume 17, Number 4

Considering Emotions in Critical English Language Teaching:
Theories and Praxis

Author: Sarah Benesch (2012)  
Publisher: New York: Routledge
Pages ISBN Price
144 pages 978-0-415-88204-0 $49.95 USD

Sarah Benesch, known to many as the author of Critical English for Academic Purposes (2001), is a prominent TESOL scholar and activist. Her newest book, Considering Emotions in Critical ELT, is certainly no disappointment in its innovation and relevance to the field of second language teaching. Relying on feminist/critical theory frameworks, Benesch explores the role of immigrant students’ and their teachers’ emotions in college instruction and identifies literacy and identity issues faced by English language learners via reading, writing, and speaking/discussion activities. Benesch attempts to answer three questions in her book: How have emotions and affect been theorized?; How might these theories of emotion be applied to research in critical ELT?; and, How might attention to emotion enhance English teaching and learning?

Each chapter prefaces the content to follow, guiding the reader from theory to practical application. Benesch addresses her first research question of how emotions and affect have been theorized in Chapters 1-3 and accounts for her third research question, i.e., that emphasizing that attention to emotions will not revolutionize critical theory in ELT, but will lead to small subtle shifts that cumulatively might lead to social reform (p. 134). Addressing her second research question, each chapter concludes with observations on how critical emotional theory applies to ELT.

In Chapter 1, Benesch introduces her rationale for considering emotions in critical ELT and provides a rationale for the book. She briefly highlights two perspectives that she further develops in the next two chapters: affect and cognition in mainstream ELT literature, and emotion and criticality in critical ELT literature. The last section of Chapter 1 is devoted to a very powerful reflexive exercise whereby Benesch writes about her social/emotional history. She uses feminist scholar Sara Ahmed’s concept of “how we feel” to explore how her own interest in critical teaching developed over time—identifying the social unrest of the 1960s as a critical training ground for her eventual move toward critical/emotional teaching.

Chapter 2 begins with a discussion of how Benesch’s work departs from four approaches outlined in the research on emotions in ELT—cognitive (Jane Arnold, John Schumann, Rebecca Oxford, Zoltan Dörnyei), sociocultural (Paula Golembek, Karen Johnson, Donald Freeman), multidisciplinary (Aneta Pavlenko), and embodied self (Claire Kramsch). Here Benesch also sets the stage for critical applied linguistics and application of critical theorizing of emotions/affect (used interchangeably) in ELT. An exploration of how affect and emotions are theorized from various fields such as sociology, geography, political theory, and anthropology comprises the bulk of Chapter 3. Benesch explores how affect and emotions are theorized in critical theory, including the influence of Baruch Spinoza and Gilles Deleuze, and looks at Ahmed’s feminist scholarship on emotions. As an example of Deleuze’s influence on her work, Chapter 5 revisits lessons on military recruitment that rely on a Deleuzian framework. In her discussion of pedagogies of affect (i.e. that disrupt/suspend the teacher/student binary), Benesch considers ‘pedagogy of friendship’ and writes about an out-of-class experience with a student where she transcended her teacher identity to take on the role of a counter-recruiter. She ultimately comes to the conclusion that critical ELT must, in the name of deeper embodied engagement, pay attention to affect and friendship as a means of unsettling binaries (p. 92).

Chapter 4 is an exploration of Ahmed’s notion of “sticky objects”—objects to which emotions adhere. Benesch uses data drawn from teachers’ and students’ reactions to dictionaries and cellphones and discusses the implications of teachers’ and students’ different reactions. Apart from dictionaries and cellphones as sticky objects, I found Benesch’s use of Stephanie Vandrick’s (2009) discussion of “Tea and TESOL” to be a particularly poignant example of feminist theory applied to ELT (p. 59). Vandrick writes about her experience with tea and teacups as both positive sticky objects and oppressive sticky objects—positive due to her associations with women around the world gathering together over tea to discuss interests and concerns, evoking mother-daughter relationships and happy memories of childhood; oppressive because tea and teacups are symbols of privilege, luxury, and tea plantations.

Chapter 6 describes Benesch’s use of two assignments using Kramsch’s notion of embodied selves in two foreign language contexts: in an undergraduate language acquisition course, and in an ESL reading course. This chapter suggests ways to of introducing emotions to language students beyond simply reproducing the status quo. To elicit embodied emotions, Benesch asked her students to come up with metaphors for second language acquisition (SLA) such as “Writing English is like trying to paint a picture with the wrong colors,” (p. 103) or “Speaking this language [English] is like being full before dessert,” (p. 103). Chapter 7 takes on Horschild’s (1979) research, the work of writing program administrators (WPA), and Zembylas’ (2005) emotion work on early childhood science teachers. With data drawn from interviews with eight teachers, this chapter also outlines various types of emotion work that teachers engage in—embodied work, emotion management, and explicitly teaching emotions.

As a professor in the City University of New York (CUNY) system, Benesch often teaches immigrant ESL students. Much of her work is informed by this in-the-classroom experience. While some may find her anti-war/anti-neoliberalism orientation intrusive, the book’s content (theory and praxis) as it relates to the field of ELT and critical pedagogy is invaluable. Moreover, her critical stance was reflexively accounted for in a very powerful opening chapter. In the introduction, where Benesch writes about her social/emotional journey, she candidly admits that this book could not have been written earlier in her career as she was not yet ready to examine the relationship between emotions and critical ELT (p. 3).

Overall, this book is informative in its broad survey of multiple theoretical and philosophical perspectives on emotion and affect, while at the same time inspiring in its empirical research examples (Chapters 4-7). Most impactful, beyond its methodological effectiveness, Benesch’s examples of her own research can be replicated by other second language teachers in their own classrooms as a means of developing their own critical lens in ELT.

Reviewed by
Winnie Tang
University of British Columbia
<winnie.tangatmarkalumni.ubc.ca>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.