• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Research Perspectives on Teaching and Learning English in Turkey: Policies and Practices

August 2014 – Volume 18, Number 2

Research Perspectives on Teaching and
Learning English in Turkey: Policies and Practices

Author: Yasemin Bayyurt & Yeşim Bektas-Ϛetinkaya (2012) (Eds.)  
Publisher: Frankfurt: Peter Lang Press
Pages ISBN Price
287 pages 978-3-631-6334-2 $70.95 USD

The field of English as a Foreign Language must be properly contextualized within the culture in which the English instruction occurs. Accordingly, this book offers an extensive picture of English language teaching in Turkey by describing the inception of English language teaching and contributing empirical studies to document current practices in English language teaching in that country. This comprehensive volume would be of benefit to teacher practitioners in Turkey as well as World Englishes scholars who seek to expand their view of how cultures influence English instruction.

This book has four different sections which are broken down into 16 different chapters that are written by a variety of authors. The volume begins with a section on teacher education in Turkey, followed by a section on English language learning in that country. The book then continues with a section on instructional technology in EFL teaching there, followed by concluding portion that provides a widening perspective on a model for English language teaching in Turkey. While there have been previous articles published about ELT in Turkey, this book is unique in that provides a deeper examination of the issues and practices that are prevalent in Turkish ELT. This review is designed to portray how the historical development of ELT in Turkey has resulted in the present day practices in the field.

The first section provides the sociocultural foundations of teacher education in Turkey, and then narrows to English language teaching in particular. Underlying these tenets of teacher education are the sociopolitical forces in Turkey which have mandated how teacher education is to occur. Although the book offers a chronological perspective of the changes in foreign language education, Akyel focuses her attention on two critical educational reforms in 1980 and 2010 which have served as the guidelines for modern day curriculum for English teacher education curriculum with a renewed emphasis on a practicum so that teacher candidates can apply their theoretical knowledge to classroom experiences. After this historical foundation, the second chapter proceeds to present an overview of the present day practices of English language teachers in present day Turkish elementary schools. This article shows that the most frequently used methods are the Audiolingual method and the Communicative Language method, while grammar translation still is prominently featured. One concern that the article voiced is that teacher candidates aren’t properly instructed in the principles of child development and language acquisition. In Chapter 4, the author argues that Turkish teachers do not have enough knowledge or skills to engage in self-directed professional development; therefore reflective teaching should play a bigger role in pre-service teacher education.

Beyond pedagogical knowledge, several chapters highlighted the need for Turkish pre-service teachers to have more instruction in intercultural competence because teacher candidates had a lack of knowledge about British culture outside of major British icons like the royal family. The candidates in the study reported that they didn’t feel that cultural knowledge was needed in order to teach the English language. Accordingly, chapters 6 and 7 pushed for more cultural content to be incorporated into pre-service teacher education. The issue of culture was also raised in chapter 10 where it found that cultural familiarity of translated stories was outweighed by the elimination of Turkish norms in writing which increased the difficulty of the reading.

The second section of the book examines the research and practices involved in English language learning in Turkey. The first chapter in this section outlines the research that have been completed in the four skill areas in Turkey, and finds that reading and writing have received more of an emphasis that research on oral skills, which is not that surprising for an EFL context. The author calls for more research to be conducted in a K-12 context, because of the dearth of ESOL research on K-12 children. The next author delivers a promising outlook that reading strategy training in English was able to be transferred to Turkish as well. One of the more recent trends in English language teaching has been content-based instruction. Yalçin addressed this issue in a chapter that described a study that compared a course that integrated content based instruction with a course that focused more on language based instruction. While the different foci did not result differences in language proficiency, the content based course yielded higher scores on content assessment. This study stressed that content based instruction offered a more motivational curriculum to promote academic achievement than previous models practiced in Turkey. The last chapter in this section addressed teacher beliefs about reading strategies. The study indicated that the participants believed that pre-reading strategies were more important than both while reading and post reading activities. This research had a followup component where the participants were assessed to see if their classroom practices matched their previously stated beliefs. The chapter offered a practical solution of using more engaging texts to increase students’ motivation to use reading strategies in their everyday learning.

The third portion of the book focused on the use of technology in English instruction in Turkey. General findings from the first chapter in this section indicated that most of the participants viewed technology as an important complement to instruction in a foreign language classroom. However, roughly only one quarter of the participants reported that they received computer assisted language learning training from their school. One of the significant issues raised was the lack of access to technology in a school setting. The next chapter made a convincing argument that instructional technology is critical if Turkish educators want to prepare their students to participate in a global society. In spite of this forward looking goal, the reality of instructional technology practice has lagged behind because schools have not embraced the changes that are needed to fully integrate the technology into instruction. Multiple chapters in this volume stated that reluctance to use technology was primarily based on the lack of experience using technology and the lack of understanding the benefits that technology could bring to their students. Furthermore, a later chapter explored how email exchange could contribute to language development. This study found that the students improved as far vocabulary usage and grammar as they learned to negotiate meaning through their on-line interaction.

To conclude this volume, Bayyurt offers a paradigm for English language education in Turkey. She argues that English as an International Language principles should be central to the curriculum so that Turkish speakers of English are able to use English in multiple global contexts while still being respectful of the local norms in Turkey.

Research Perspectives on Teaching and Learning English in Turkey: Policies and Practices provides a rich picture of the historical context of English instruction in Turkey before exploring research into current practices to advance the field for teachers and students of English alike. This volume would be a must read for English educators in Turkey and other English as a foreign language contexts.

Reviewed by
Gwendolyn M. Williams
University of West Florida
<gwilliams1atmarkuwf.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.