• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Why Should They?

November 2022 – Volume 26, Number 3

https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26103a26

Brian Tomlinson
Materials Development Association (MATSDA)
<brianjohntomlinsonatmarkgmail.com>

Why should a learner of English in Pontianak have to learn to speak the English spoken by a well-educated native speaker of English in Cambridge? And why should a learner of English in Lima be corrected for not speaking English like the East Coast American teaching her? And most importantly why should a learner of English in Paris fail his examination because he speaks French English with a strong but internationally intelligible accent?

As I said in Tomlinson (2021, p. 641):

All over the world, learners of English are being tested on a variety of English they do not and never will speak. They are being tested on British English or American English and not on the Singapore English or Brazilian English or the International English that they speak. These learners are also being assessed on their ability to do what they are unlikely to need to do and they are not being tested on their ability to do what they are likely to need to do.

The problem is that the assumption that so-called standard varieties of English are the only correct and acceptable varieties still persists. It still persists in the attitudes and products of language planners, curriculum developers, materials developers and assessors. And therefore it still persists in the attitudes and work of publishers, teachers and teacher trainers. And sadly it still persists in the minds and aspirations of learners of English throughout the world, who can communicate successfully with other speakers of English from their country and from other countries around the world and yet feel (and are told) that their English is inadequate because it does not match the native speaker models they are instructed to emulate.

What is a native speaker anyway? There are so many varieties used by first language speakers of English and many of them differ dramatically from the others. How similar is Texan English to Australian English, Geordie to New Zealand English, Scouse to South African English? And which variety should language learners emulate? Surely what matters is that for a variety of English to be acceptable it should be mutually intelligible with other varieties of English and that its users can communicate effectively with users of other varieties both regionally and internationally.

I am a native speaker of English from Lancashire in the north of England and yet I was told by my English teacher at school that I would need to have elocution lessons to learn to speak RP if I was to succeed in a teaching or academic career. I refused and was turned down by the BBC and by the British Council when I applied for posts with them and many years later I was turned down for a post at a university in Hong Kong because I did not speak with an RP accent. Yet I have taught, trained teachers and lectured in English in Nigeria, Zambia, Vanuatu, Indonesia, Japan, Singapore, Oman and Malaysia and I have given conference presentations in English in over seventy countries. In doing so I have communicated in English with speakers of very many different varieties of English. In most cases I have understood them and they have understood me. Too often though I have been given undue esteem and respect simply because I am a native speaker and they are not. That is something I would like to see come to an end and be replaced by equal respect for speakers of any variety who can communicate effectively.

I am not advocating teaching learners a specific variety of English. What I am advocating is gradually exposing learners to multiple differing varieties both native and non-native and providing multiple opportunities for learners to communicate purposefully and meaningfully in English with interactants from their own communities, from neighbouring countries and from around the world. I am also advocating assessing learners not on their ability to mimic a native speaker of English but on their communicative capabilities and their facilitating skills (e.g. accommodation, clarification, exemplification).

For full details of what I am advocating for the learning and assessment of English as a second language see Tomlinson (2006; 2021). It could all be summed up though with the recommendation that learners be prepared for the reality of post-course use of English by providing them in the classroom with rich and authentic experience of a variety of Englishes (including their own) and of opportunities for interaction with users of them.

About the Author

Brian Tomlinson is President of MATSDA, a Visiting Professor at the University of Liverpool and a TESOL Professor at Anaheim University. He has worked in nine countries (as well as giving presentations in over seventy) and has recently co-authored with Hitomi Masuhara The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning and SLA Applied: Connecting Theory and Practice. ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6717-5444

To Cite this Article

Tomlinson, B. (2022). Why Should They? Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 26 (3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26103a26

References

Tomlinson, B. (2006). A multi-dimensional response to teaching English for the world. In R. Rubdy & M. Saraceni (eds.), English in the World: Global Rules, Global Roles (pp. 130-150). Continuum.

Tomlinson, B. (2021). Which test of English and why? In A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes (2nd edn, pp. 641-658). Routledge.

Copyright of articles rests with the authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.