• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

The Exploratorium Guide to Scale and Structure

September 1998 — Volume 3, Number 3

The Exploratorium Guide to Scale and Structure

Barry Kluger-Bell and the School in the Exploratorium (1995)
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Pp. vii + 198
ISBN 0-435-08372-4 (paper)
US $29.50

Appropriate materials are crucial for ESL and EFL teachers who want to do content-based language teaching. Trying to teach a complex subject in the student’s second language can easily lead to confusion or even surrender. The Exploratorium Guide to Scale and Structure provides a model for teachers who need a hands-on approach to any subject. It provides visual examples that are clear in any language, fosters an inquisitive nature and a trial and error approach to learning, and offers students the opportunity to communicate with their hands and minds.

This book is a product of the Exploratorium, a museum dedicated to a hands-on approach to learning, and the activities put forth in this publication demonstrate the approach well. Each of the thirty-six activities presented allows students to explore the materials presented to them and apply principles of physics to the different manipulatives made available. The activities are geared for third- through eighth-grade teachers. The guide offers classroom activities designed to come before the explanations to allow students the opportunity to tinker and figure out patterns for themselves.

Broken into three sections, the activities cover the content of the physics and engineering of structure, the mathematics of scale, and the effect of scale on structure. Section 1 activities demonstrate the forces that must be considered in engineering. The section encourages students to organize their plans before construction. After construction, the teacher encourages reflection on how well their results fit their designs. Students reflect on ways they could improve on their structure in terms of strength and stability. Cuisenaire rods, Lincoln logs, Legos, and sugar cubes are all recommended for tests of strength in building materials. Balance, center of mass, joint quality, and building up and out are the key concepts of the first section. For teachers who may need review, each section begins with a teacher’s overview of the concepts presented. Section 2 activities present students with structures made from equal content but different scales. At different sizes, the objects behave differently. Student measurements are charted to observe the different rates at which perimeter, area, and volume increase as a structure grows. Again, reflection and explanation follow the activities to allow students to observe their own achievements or failings and change their course of action. The third section sews the first two sections together as students observe and make hypotheses about the strength and stability of [-1-] structures of different scale. Students’ hypotheses involve suggested methods of counteracting the forces placed on larger structures such as bridges, cantilevers, and towers.

The Exploratorium Guide to Scale and Structure is a worthwhile investment for curricula involving basic principles of physics. The activities range from very basic, such as Water Drop Pennies (pp. 164-166), in which students count how many water drops will fit on the face of a penny before surface tension breaks the water dome, to more complex studies, such as Growing Cubes (pp. 115-118), in which students must record dimension changes as a cube increases in length. In Growing Cubes, the students are challenged to find a mathematical pattern to the increase in perimeter, total surface area, and volume of a cube as its length increases.

Each activity in introduced with helpful instructions on cooperative learning groups, materials, and clean-up. Suggested materials are all reasonably priced items found in any shopping center. Engaging questions and methods of passing out materials will help draw students into these activities. Students will enjoy the tinkering that the activities allow and encourage. Other positive qualities of the guide include its approach to student competition. Enough facets of any student construction are offered for observation. In this way, the different qualities of different constructions can be verbally rewarded. Several different types of success are recognized within the activity frameworks. Each activity can be followed by several suggested extensions. The extensions connect the content to the student’s personal life and to other branches of science. The same forces acting on towers made of barbecue skewers also act on rainforest trees and the guide allows for these comparisons. More direct comparisons are made between student constructions and similar architectural triumphs around the world. These activities can segue from physics to a study of ancient Rome by way of the Pantheon or to anatomy by way of the function of joints. The activities transfer well to more interdisciplinary lesson plans.

Suggestions are made regarding placement of the lessons. More complex activities offer suggestions of lesson plans and content that should precede. The previous exposure of the class to content is considered. Also, more simple activities offer suggestions about what type of content should follow.

The text is user-friendly in its vocabulary and page layout. Each lesson includes photos of the activity in action in an elementary classroom. Appendices C & D offer several blank data charts for photocopying and reference. Examples of student work are also offered. Typical student responses to questions in the text give teachers an idea of what to expect from their particular classes. Variations from responses in the text can punctuate new directions that students have discovered themselves as a result of their own [-2-] hypotheses and experimentation. Building on these activities is greatly encouraged.

Depending on how deeply a class is allowed to delve into physics and engineering, the guide can offer valuable instruction for several weeks of lesson plans. Deciding which activities to leave out of a class schedule is difficult. The activities hinge well on the ones before them and the full content of one lesson may require the inclusion of a different lesson at a different scale to come across to students.

The time and preparation needed for several of the activities are unrealistic. Finding an open area in which to store several cantilevers made from 4-foot long bamboo garden stakes could prevent teachers from undertaking this investigation. Also, certain activities require a time commitment of 3 to 5 sixty-minute periods while not fulfilling adequate content coverage to justify a full week of effort.

For an ESL classroom, the guide offers nonverbal learning rather than the verbal examples employed by many teachers to explain the laws of physics. This facilitates the participation of students with limited English language development. By demonstrating principles in action or allowing the students to demonstrate these principles for themselves, the teacher can facilitate the understanding of structure and its change with scale change.

Students working in this program are called upon to offer their best team effort to achieve goals of stability in structure. Excellent moral lessons are quietly woven into this curriculum. Goals can be met only through a better understanding of physical law and the inclusion of each mind, working together to experiment, observe what works and what doesn’t, and why.

Daniel Janes
University of Memphis
<Cwindow@aol.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.