• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Teaching in Action: Case Studies From Second Language Classrooms

July 1999 — Volume 4, Number 1

Teaching in Action: Case Studies From Second Language Classrooms

Jack C. Richards (Ed.) (1998)
Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL)
Pp xiv + 411
ISBN 0-939-79173-0 (paper)
US $29.95 (members US $26.95)

Introduction

Textbooks written to assist teachers new to exploratory practice and action research are far too often lengthy, prohibitively erudite and scholarly in style. Teaching in Action is a refreshing antidote to such heavy, theoretical tomes. It is a collection of seventy-six short, concisely written case studies on eleven distinct areas of English language teaching (ELT), such as teacher development, teaching in mainstream programmes and introducing curriculum innovations. As such, it describes how language teachers in a large variety of situations respond to everyday classroom encounters. Each case, of between four and eight pages, outlines a teaching context varying from London, UK to Victoria, Australia, followed by a description of the ELT problem that arose. For example, when negative learner attitudes emerge, such as those described in case 27, from Kowloon, Hong Kong, how might teachers overcome them? Following this is the teacher’s response to such a problem and then a short commentary from a teacher educator, reflecting and commenting on both the classroom problem and teacher’s response. Clearly the aim of this collection is to provide a representative description of situations that commonly occur in second language classrooms from literally all around the world, along with accounts that show teachers engaging in complex thought, articulating ideas, and making decisions on how to solve local problems. This reflection and decision-making are major components of what we understand as “teaching skill”; taken together, via their case studies, they provide highly thought-provoking analyses.

The Study of Teachers at Work

How teachers access and make use of their knowledge and experience is of increasing interest in the literature on research into language teaching. Richards points out in the introduction that the literature until recently has been over-concerned with outsiders looking into classrooms, describing what they see, then stating the significance. Excellent work carried out by Chaudron (1988) and Allright & Bailey (1991) exemplifies such an approach. More recent teacher-research in books such as Teaching in Action attempts to redress this imbalance. The case studies are not intended as [-1-] models of excellent teaching but are aimed at facilitating further reflection among teachers, who may perhaps recognize their own recurring problems. Typical case studies include number 11, involving teachers “doing more with less” in order to integrate students into a school in New Zealand, and case 33, using the musical concept of variations on a theme to respond to institutionalised plagiarism in higher education in Hong Kong.

Contributors and Contexts

Contributions to Teaching in Action were written in response to the editor’s invitation for such material and come from teachers working in extremely varied circumstances. Few teachers are fortunate enough to have been involved in ELT in more than a handful of different countries; thus the detailed context section of each case study provides fascinating insight into conditions teachers may never experience first-hand. These range from dealing with Ethiopian immigrants in Israel to tackling issues on the language needs of indigenous Australian aboriginals. The case studies represent all continents, although the balance tilts towards issues in ELT in the Far East and U.S. contexts involving immigrant students. The latter is, perhaps, understandable considering the huge amount of ELT taking place in such environments. Many studies outline either programmes within the higher education sector concerning English for Specific Purposes and English for Academic Purposes, particularly pre-faculty intensive courses, or key issues involving in-service teacher training. Contributors tend to be teachers completing or having already completed post-graduate degrees at Master and Doctorate level in language teaching. Occasionally, where team research occurred, studies are co-authored, and in certain cases individual writers have made contributions to more than one section of the book.

Specific Case Studies

The eleven sections of the book can be divided into two main parts. The first deals with elements such as training and development, relationships, management and classroom behaviour, while the second involves teaching the four skills at various levels and with classes of varying ability. Although I found many studies in this book to be full of professional insight and worth re-reading, of particular interest were those in the first part, such as the one by Nancy Mutoh on “Managing Large Classes” (case 6)–an endemic problem, unfortunately, for many teachers, but one dealt with using the simplest filing system imaginable. Worth heeding very carefully, also, is the advice from Annette Lyn Dobler on “Relations with Colleagues and Students” (case 19) when students misinterpret teacher interest and become over-friendly. [-2-]

Teacher Educator Comments

The final part of each case study is provided by experienced teacher educators, many of whom are currently involved in ELT management or research into specific areas of language learning. Leading figures in ELT such as David Nunan (curriculum design), Kathleen Bailey (classroom research), and Diane Larsen-Freeman (second language acquisition) comment upon several cases in the book, usually but not always related to their own particular research fields. While the case studies are almost wholly practical and pragmatic, the comments made, generally of half a page, tend to highlight, synthesise and very often provide useful scholarly references for further reading. Evaluations of cases consist of constructive remarks or praise for teachers’ efforts, but are also sometimes critical. In case 47 for example, comments by John Murphy on “Giving Effective Written Feedback to ESL Global Writing Errors” by Candis Lee consist of questions and insightful suggestions.

The Importance of ELT Case Studies

Sound methodology textbooks and courses are obviously of the utmost importance in providing teachers with the basic means of coping in the classroom, be it preparing lessons involving all four skills or class management. However, in order for such books and courses on teacher training to be more informed, we also need to know what it is that teachers actually do when they go into the classroom, what they think and how they react when confronted with issues that may run counter to their training. Teaching in Action clearly illustrates dimensions that teachers bring to the classroom, such as personal philosophies of teaching and learning, and background experience as both teacher and student. Whilst activities such as journal studies, action research, peer observation and others are all valuable means of collecting data, case studies are a particularly useful form of research since they are not only easy to obtain, but also provide a rich source of teacher-generated information that is descriptive as well as evaluative.

Teacher Training Using Teaching in Action

Teaching in Action is a valuable book in that it illustrates teachers involved in action research in order to solve problems right where it matters–at a grass-roots level in their own classrooms. While individual case studies could be isolated and used as source material for both teachers and teacher educators, whole sections, such as “Relations with Colleagues and Students” or [-3-] “Achieving Appropriate Learner Behaviours” could be linked to components of training courses. Instructors could assign students to either describe some of the contexts alone or ask the group to brainstorm ideas before discussing particular problems and then either their own suggested solutions or actual solutions put forward by teacher educators.

Conclusion

I have only one criticism of this book and that concerns proof-reading. Considering the world-wide renown TESOL has for producing key ELT books, one would expect fewer overlooked typing errors; “conveyed” instead of “convey” in the Conclusion section on page 27 is only one of quite a few. Don’t, however, let this detract from the success of such an informative book. All teachers of language would do well to read the whole book and then continue to dip into it from time to time. These case studies deserve to be read and reread.

References

Allright, D., and Bailey, K.M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chaudron C. (1988) Second language classrooms.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wayne Trotman
Özel Çakabey Lisesi, Izmir, Turkey
<wayne@egenet.com.tr>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-4-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.