• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Literacy and Language Teaching

December 2001 — Volume 5, Number 3

Literacy and Language Teaching

Richard Kern (2000)
Oxford: Oxford University Press
Pp. x + 358
ISBN 0 19 4421627 (paperback)
£19.25 / $19.95

For Richard Kern, “literacy” in a second language means much more than the separate abilities to read and write; rather, it is a complex concept of familiarity with language and its use in context–primarily written language, but by extension also spoken communication. It requires “a broader discourse competence that involves the ability to interpret and critically evaluate a wide variety of written and spoken texts” (p. 2). It covers cultural knowledge and pragmatic and linguistic awareness as well as basic knowledge of lexis and grammatical structure. It is promoted through an interaction of reading and writing activities, and through the discussion of language in use in communicative contexts. And for Kern, literacy provides a unifying, overarching concept describing what it is that he is trying to achieve in language teaching, and what it is that will enable second language learners to function adequately in a literate foreign society.

In his book, Kern describes how “literacy” in this very broad sense provides both a framework and a goal for language teaching. It is a scholarly book, drawing on research and ideas from a variety of fields to provide a theoretical basis for the application of the literacy concept to language teaching; but it is also at times very practical, discussing and describing (sometimes at considerable length) how the ideas presented can be applied in the classroom. As the back-cover blurb puts it, “Addressing key research findings in cognitive theory, sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, language acquisition, and literacy studies, the book attempts to put literary, cultural, linguistic, and cognitive theory on a productive parity with classroom practice.” This sounds a major undertaking, and indeed it is; the result of the attempt is a complex edifice of interlinked ideas presented in a book which in some ways reads like an extended essay on teaching. Most of the theory involved is derived from other sources–sources which are meticulously documented–but it is the combination of theories to form an overall teaching concept which is Kern’s particular contribution.

The book is divided into three sections. Part One discusses the concept of literacy in the context of second language teaching. Part Two considers the teaching of reading and writing separately, and contains chapters with a number of practical classroom ideas to illustrate how the more theoretical notions can be translated into practice. Part Three contains chapters on those two typical “last section” topics, computers and evaluation, as well as a concluding chapter on “Rethinking language and literacy teaching”. The chapter on computers illustrates in its range of subject matter Kern’s occasional coverage of rather too much ground as he tries to work everything into one grandiose scheme. But on the whole, the planning of the book is logical, and the overall coherence satisfying.

Not surprisingly, the examples of language teaching are illustrative rather than an attempt to provide material for a full course, but they are often unusual and interesting. Though related primarily to teaching the written language, they are mostly classroom activities, not activities for “homework”. Kern writes: [-1-]

The basic curricular sequence recommended for literacy-based teaching is one that works from exploration of meaning, through social interaction, to the internalization of those processes of exploration within the individual, eventually leading to learners’ greater independence as readers and writers. This explains why most of the examples in this book are in-class examples. . .: students need first to be prepared for independence. (p. 213)

As with the theoretical underpinnings of his approach, Kern’s teaching activities are by no means all original; many of them are again drawn from a variety of other sources. Kern’s aim is to show how these various activities, and others like them, can be used in combination to promote literacy.

Kern teaches French at an American university, and this probably affects the view of language learning and teaching which he has developed. Many of his students presumably lack close contact and cultural familiarity with societies where the target language of his teaching is spoken, and his ideas for what should be included in teaching reflect this. His students expect to deal with both language and literature, and Kern’s concept of literacy involves the ability to interact with both literary and non-literary texts. His students would also probably expect to take a slightly academic view of language learning. Knowing something of Kern’s background perhaps helps to understand how his ideas have developed, but it should not be thought that these ideas apply solely to language teaching in a university context; Kern argues forcefully for the literacy concept to be taken into account in teaching at all levels and in all situations. He also stresses the importance of the literacy concept for teaching the spoken language.

Kern’s writing style can be quite ponderous, as the extract above illustrates. The book is not especially easy reading, especially in the more theoretical sections, but it is lightened by the practical examples.

This is an important book, which many teachers will find stimulating and even inspirational. Kern’s ideas probably should not be seen as representing a completely new approach to language teaching, however. Many of the concepts and suggestions are drawn from other sources, and while they are nearly all “modern” in language teaching terms, they are not individually exactly “new”. The combination of these ideas and the justification for that combination, which is the more original contribution made in this book, is perhaps best viewed as additive to rather than a replacement for other teaching approaches. But teachers who discover as they read that they respond to Kern’s views and find they make good sense–as I did–may acquire a fresh and deeper perspective on their teaching, and on what is involved in learning a language.

Tim Caudery
University of Aarhus, Denmark
<engtc@mail.hum.au.dk>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-2-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.