• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Better Writing Through Editing

June 2002 — Volume 6, Number 1

Better Writing Through Editing

Stacy Hagan and Jan Peterson (1999)
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill College
Pp. x + 322
ISBN 0-07-049885-7(paper)
US $29.70

Editing skills are essential to good writers, be they native speakers or non-native speakers, experts or novices. To a large extent, editing involves identifying grammar errors and correcting them, especially for ESL/EFL learners who tend to repeat their errors. Hence the guideline they need to bear in mind is trouble-shooting. That is to say, the learners find out and correct the grammar errors, then classify them into error types, and practice relevant grammar intensively until they internalize those grammar rules.

Better Writing Through Editing by Stacy Hagan and Jan Peterson is a textbook embracing the trouble-shooting philosophy. It is designed for intermediate ESL/EFL learners to improve their writing through increasing their awareness of sentence variety and grammar error types as well as keeping track of their progresses with charts.

The book comprises 3 parts plus 7 appendices and 7 charts. Part 1, “Getting Started” contains 5 chapters beginning with a diagnostic grammar test. The following chapters introduce the editing system (error types and marking symbols such as “frag” for “fragment”,” v” for “verb”), sample error chart, progress chart, and sample rewrite. Part 1 can be viewed as the book’s gist, which is sufficient for people who have no time to finish reading the whole book. Targeting writing skills at the sentence and paragraph level, Part 2, “Writing Focus” takes in 7 chapters, dealing respectively with simple sentences, formal and informal compound sentences, complex sentences (adverb/adjective clauses), combination sentences and finally sentence variety. Each chapter in part 2 adopts such a format:

  1. Quick facts around a topic
  2. Words to know
  3. And you?
  4. Sentence form
  5. Example sentences
  6. Watch out for . . .(common errors)
  7. Writing practice (at sentence level)
  8. Writing topics (at paragraph/essay level)
  9. Answer key to exercise

Part 3, “Editing Focus” is the body of the whole book. Each chapter inspects one type of grammar error in the pattern of error description, examples and corrections, plus extensive exercises. According to the authors, there are 16 types of common grammar errors: 1: Unclear Sentences and Translation Problem; 2: Fragments; 3: Run-ons; 4: Comma Splices; 5: Verbs; 6: Singular/Plural; 7: Subject-Verb Agreement; 8: Noun-Pronoun Agreement; 9: Word Choice; 10: Word Form; 11: Word Order; 12: Prepositions; 13: Articles: 14: Punctuation; 15: Capitalization; and 16: Spelling. The last chapter of Part 3 is another diagnostic test for checking the overall efficacy of using the book. [-1-]

The seven appendices of the book list examples and grammar rules (if any) for irregular verbs, nouns, gerunds and infinitives, quotations, etc. The book ends with handy error charts and progress charts so that the students can have clear checklists for errors and be able to keep track of their progresses.

In addition to those helpful charts, Better Writing Through Editing includes other invaluable features. A beginning test can uncover the common errors of the students and the teacher may arrange the sequence of the chapters according to the strengths and weaknesses of the students, while the final test may reveal the students progress. Grammar presentations are simple and concise. Students mainly acquire grammar rules by correcting errors. Learning from failures of others or their own can cultivate positive learning attitudes. Writing assignments are explicitly labeled as comparison/contrast, description, cause, effect etc. and are closely related to students’ life. An interesting activity in the book is the so-called “ten perfect sentences,” in which the students are asked to write 10 sentences belonging to a specific type (e.g. compound sentence). The teacher then crosses out those with errors, and the students write the equivalent amount of incorrect sentences until they get 10 perfectly correct sentences.

Better Writing Through Editing is good for an editing/grammar class with intermediate ESL/ESL students. It can also be used as a supplementary resource for a writing class. The Teacher’s Edition contains adaptable charts, chapter quizzes, sample lesson plans, and teaching suggestions.

My advice for using the book would be not to hesitate to add/delete types of errors on the charts. To accommodate my class, I added “wrong shift of tense/ person” and “vague pronoun reference” as another two common errors. In addition, I tried to rearrange the sequence of the error types according to their frequency. Among the words in a sentence, verbs are the most important (since they indicate state, action and trend) and the trickiest (as their tense and form vary). Thus, I would suggest coping with verb errors first. In contrast, Chapter 1 of Part 3, Unclear Sentences and Translation Problem, may be positioned to the end, because any unidentified errors, such as those related to semantics, idioms and conventions, can be put into this category.

With reader-friendly design, clear-cut grammar error targets and contextualized practice, Better Writing Through Editing will be a powerful tool for ESL/EFL students who are anxious to be capable of editing and polishing their writing.

Yuehai Xiao
University of Cincinnati
<ucxx@hotmail.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

Return to Table of Contents Return to Top Return to Main Page

[-2-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.