• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Literacy Assessment of Second Language Learners

March 2003 — Volume 6, Number 4

Literacy Assessment of Second Language Learners

Josefina Villamil Tinajero & Sandra Rollins Hurley, Eds. (2001)
Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Pp. iv + 190
ISBN 0-205-27443-9 (paper)
$32.00

Literacy assessment in the ESL/bilingual classroom is often a difficult task for the beginning teacher. Literacy Assessment of Second Language Learners emphasizes the importance of connecting teaching, learning, and assessment in meaningful ways in the classroom. The book is divided into ten chapters. Each chapter begins with a teaching scenario and then gives a research overview of the chapter’s thesis Finally, each chapter offers implications for practice and practical applications.

Lapp, Fisher, Flood, and Cabello of San Diego State begin the first chapter, “An Integrated Approach to the Teaching of Assessment of Language Arts”, with a discussion as to whether public schools must adapt to meet the needs of the multicultural students or whether the students should adapt to the school. Given the changing U.S. demographics, meeting the needs of all students, including English language learners (ELL), is an important issue for administrators and teachers to consider. The highlight of this chapter is a table outlining the development of reading and writing for ESL students. Likewise, there are several assessment rubrics located at the end of the chapter that beginning teachers would find useful.

Chapter Two, written by the editors, Tinajero and Rollins Hurley, gives a well-written overview of progress assessment in the second language classroom. The background on teaching and assessment in early literacy is addressed in this chapter. In particular, the authors give a helpful chart that describes the stages of language acquisition, and student behaviors/strategies are given. Beginning teachers, or regular education teachers who are unfamiliar with ELLs, would find this chart helpful since the chapter gives a very basic background on early literacy and assessment.

Escamilla and Coady of the University of Colorado, Denver wrote Chapter Three “Assessing the Writing of Spanish-Speaking Students: Issues and Suggestions”. This chapter presents an overview of the similarities/differences in writing in English and Spanish. Interestingly, the authors discuss the issue of writing rubrics and the need for rubrics to be evaluated in both languages. For those teachers who teach in areas with a high population of hispanophone students, this chapter would be helpful in connecting the many similarities and differences of Spanish and English. However, this chapter, and the rest of the text, is negligent in discussing second languages other than Spanish.

Pierce of George Mason University writes Chapter Four, “Assessment of Reading Comprehension Strategies for Intermediate Bilingual Learners”. Pierce presents a very practical overview of how teachers view reading assessment. The chapter begins with two teachers’ viewpoints on the issue, and then describes the teachers’ views about reading assessment. In particular, the two teacher viewpoints are especially important for novice teachers. This dialogue allows teachers with little experience to read and understand the perspectives of experienced language teachers. [-1-]

Rollins Hurley and Blake from the University of Texas at El Paso discuss “Assessment in the Content Area for Students Acquiring English” in Chapter Five. The authors present an overview of learning in English in the content areas. They offer six practical principles of good practice in assessment to follow, and a Content Reading and Study Skills Inventory is given. In particular, this chapter is helpful for those teachers who teach at the middle school and high school levels since there is an emphasis on teaching within the content areas.. Lastly, for those teachers who teach in areas where Spanish is a predominant language spoken, the Spanish/English charts are practical and helpful.

Chapter Six is written by Fisher, Lapp, and Flood of San Diego State University and by Suarez of the San Diego Unified School District. One of the main highlights of this chapter is a chart that explains assessment accommodations for English Language Learners. This chart would be particularly helpful for regular education teachers who may need to make accommodations for the ELL in his or her class.

Jim Cummins of the University of Ontario presents an overview of assessment and intervention for culturally and linguistically diverse learners in Chapter Seven. The chapter begins with a scenario about Ms. Sampson, an ESL teacher, and her concern for her student, Phan Nguyen. The problem addressed in this teaching scenario is how teachers and administrators can distinguish the differences between language learning difficulties and language disorders. Guidelines for teachers are given for teachers to determine if a child actually is learning English at a normal rate versus a child who may have a language disorder. Four options for assessment of bilingual students’ cognitive and academic abilities are discussed. Like the other chapters, the strengths of this chapter are the numerous practical applications. With the current emphasis on high stakes testing, this chapter is especially relevant to the needs of teachers since teachers are under even greater pressure for accountability.

Fradd and Lee from the University of Miami present a framework for integrating standardized and informal assessment for ELLs in Chapter Eight. The authors present a scenario between a teacher and her class. This scenario describes the complaints of students who are required to write using a prompt in preparation for a standardized test. To combat this problem, the authors describe writing rubrics which teachers can use throughout the content areas, so that content area instruction can be addressed in writing.

Kerper Mora of San Diego State presents an overview of effective instructional practices relating to literacy assessment in Chapter Nine. Kerper Mora presents the colorful classroom of a bilingual teacher, Rosa Sandoval. The chapter describes how biliteracy is developed in such a classroom and offers a wonderful checklist that teachers can refer to when monitoring children’s biliteracy development. The practical application in this chapter is especially helpful to new teachers, or to preservice teachers, who may have limited classroom experience.

The text ends with Chapter Ten, “Assessing Our Work with Parents on Behalf of Children’s Literacy”. The authors of this chapter, Flor Ada of the University of San Francisco and Campoy of Transformative Educational Services discuss the importance of building a collaborative relationship with parents, and they examine six categories of collaboration with parents. [-2-]

Overall, the text’s organization is clear and logical, and it is appropriate for both preservice and inservice teachers at all levels of instruction. One of the most valuable features of the text are the scenarios that begin each chapter and the practical application that is woven throughout each chapter. These scenarios are realistic, and I applaud the authors for their well-written overview of the research and application to the classroom. In my own classroom, I use this book as a supplemental text in literacy/ESL classes that I teach, and it has been well received by my students. In particular, this text is more appropriate for states that have students who primarily speak Spanish. The title of the book is a little deceiving since the book’s focus is on second language learners and literacy assessment; however, only Spanish/English is addressed.

As a former Texas public school ESL teacher, I found this book incredibly helpful in giving me a plethora of ideas on various forms of assessment, particularly in the content areas. Rollins Hurley and Tinajero’s text is a valuable resource for teachers especially during today’s times of high stakes testing and accountability.

Jan Guidry Lacina
Stephen F. Austin State University
<Jlacina@sfasu.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.