• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Gender and English Language Learners

December 2004 — Volume 8, Number 3

Gender and English Language Learners

Bonny Norton and Aneta Pavlenko (2004)
Alexandria, VA: TESOL, Inc.
Pp. iii + 169
ISBN 1931185131 (paper)

Gender and English Language Learners, by Bonny Norton and Aneta Pavlenko, is a new addition to the Case Studies in TESOL Practice Series. The volumes in this series use the case study research format to present current findings in specialized areas of TESOL teaching. This format is useful because it provides for the discussion of fundamental principles while demonstrating that successful applications of these principles are particular to individual learning environments. The series is designed to suit the practical needs of educators specializing in the field of TESOL by presenting issues relevant to teaching in a manner that encourages educators to understand and solve problems within their own personal framework or classroom environment.

The book opens with an introductory chapter and is subsequently organized around four sections: Teaching for Change, Student Voices, Innovations for All, and Insights from Japan.

It may be important for prospective readers to know that Gender and English Language Learners is not a book that delves into the body of research concerning whether or not females are better language learners than males and to which factors this contestable phenomenon might be attributable. Norton and Pavlenko point out that they wish to avoid any discussion of gender and language learning that focuses on biological gender differences. In contrast, the driving force behind the feminist themes presented seems to be an orientation toward displacing the discussion concerning gender and language learning from a male/female dichotomy of superiority/inferiority altogether. The book aims to reexamine the nature of gender identity and language within the complex nexus of age, race, culture, and social identity in learning environments.

In the opening chapter they postulate that a Western perspective may distort our insight into what constitutes gender identity, as well as group membership in culture, and state that ignoring oppression in terms of class, ethnicity, race, sexuality, religion, or disability obscures any possibility that men and women within a particular group may have more in common with each other than with other groups or individuals. The salient terminology that will be used in the text is defined, the need for the arguments is presented, and the overall organization of the book is explained. This chapter provides a good solid introduction to each of the four sections that follow.

Each of the three case studies in Part 1: Teaching For Change provides evidence in support of two main concepts: the need to address gender in language learning environments as a necessary component of culture learning in the classroom and to illustrate methods for including gender related themes in ESL or EFL contexts. One aspect of this section that sets it apart from many other TESOL teaching resources is that it provides a framework for presenting gay and lesbian themes in language learning environments in a straightforward yet appropriate manner. Nelson makes two essential arguments. Firstly, ESL students from cultures where homosexuality is less accepted are likely to be confronted with situations in which they must demonstrate an understanding of our cultural norms and values towards homosexuality, and secondly, ESL students from cultures in which homosexual themes are dealt with openly, or who may be homosexual themselves, must not be forced to arrive at the conclusion that their norms and values are not respected or discussed. The case study described how one teacher dealt with personal feelings of ambiguity and discomfort, but subsequently approached and integrated gay and lesbian topics into her instruction while maintaining an emphasis on curriculum goals and without “setting up an issues-based debate” (p. 25). The chapter demonstrates how students can benefit from engaging such themes in the classroom as opposed to being subjected to a steadfast avoidance of them.

Each of the two case studies presented in Part 2: Student Voices examines the role of gender in learning environments and classroom interactions from the student’s perspective. The case study of a Malaysian ESL classroom is a critical component of the book because it is the first to examine the male voice in an academic institution dominated by females. This context gave researchers an opportunity to investigate the academic achievement, motivation, and class participation of men in a largely female learning environment. Speaking in Silence: A case study of a Canadian Punjabi girl, delivers an in-depth look at the classroom dynamics, which contributed to the silence of a 2nd grade ESL child. The personalized context and vivid attention to social/linguistic detail will provide readers with a thought provoking experience and credible insight into the silent workings of the classroom environment in which the undercurrents of linguistic interaction shape the identities of young ESL students.

Part 3: Innovations For All describes various community language projects, which successfully contributed to raising awareness about sociocultural influences in the negotiation of gender roles and gendered identity. The three case studies included in this section respectively discuss the raising of awareness by: promoting literacy in a rural female population in Uganda, exploring the notion of racialized gender at an antidiscrimination camp in Canada, and examining the relationship between gender and technology at an American university. One interesting result reported in this section was that women living in rural Uganda were able to become effective disseminators of knowledge, thereby improving their social status, despite maintaining traditional female roles within the community.

The final portion of the book, Part 4: Insights From Japan provides a fitting conclusion. The three case studies detailed in these chapters each address a different aspect of the marginalized role of females in Japanese culture and how researchers sought to create learning environments that helped both male and female students acknowledge and overcome obstacles to equitable gender relations.

Final Comments

In effect, reading this book may serve to remind readers that students in ESL or EFL classrooms are not just involved in second language acquisition, but second culture acquisition as well. If this idea is to be considered a valid one, then it becomes critical to examine the manner in which motivation, access to educational experiences, interactional dynamics, and other sociolinguistic factors such as those described in the case studies included in this volume, affect the gendered identities of students endeavoring to learn English as their second language. A major attribute of Gender and English Language Learners, which makes it a valuable resource for TESOL educators, is the inclusion of practical applications that are research based and informed by the experiences of actual educators at the conclusion every chapter. An emphasis on encouraging teachers to consider their own behavior and become critically aware of the gendered aspects of curriculum and personal teaching methodologies is a recurring theme, which is consistently discussed throughout the text.

Each chapter within the four sections builds upon the previous one and the conclusions supported by the case studies are effective in constructing a cohesive and persuasive argument that sheds light on the sociocultural impact of language on gender identification and vice versa. It is also important to acknowledge that the limitations of each study included in the text are described and any mitigating factors relevant to the conclusions are presented for the benefit of the reader. However, some readers may feel that the overall premise is somewhat one sided in that there are only two case studies that address gender/gendering within language learning environments and include the male perspective.

Sarah McKnight
University of Central Florida: MA TESOL Program
<sarahideus.nl>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation..

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.