• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Reading for Meaning

March 2005 — Volume 8, Number 4

Reading for Meaning

Author Tom Snyder Productions  
Contact Information Tom Snyder Productions
80 Coolidge Hill Road
Watertown MA 02472-5003, USA.
Phone: 1-800- 342-0236
FAX: 1-800-304-1254
Email: ask@tomsnyder.com
Web site: http://www.tomsnyder.com
Product Type Reading and Language Arts
Minimum System Requirements Hardware Machine Platform PC Mac
Operating System Windows OS 98 / 98SE/ ME/ 2000/ XP home/ XP pro Mac OS 8.1/ 8.6/ 9/ X.1 (native)
Chip Windows 200 Mhz, Pentium I or higher Mac 200 Mhz, Power PC
Minimum Display 16 bit colors; 800×600 resolution Thousands of colors; 800×600 resolution
RAM 32 MB RAM
Hard Disk 50 MB of hard drive space
Software Browser Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher (included on CD) Or Netscape Navigator 4.0 or higher
Flash Player Version 5.0 or higher (included on CD)
Shockwave Included on CD
Price Number of computers Price (all USD)
1  $99.00
5  $300.00
10  $600.00
30  $900.00
50  $1,050.00
Unlimited Value Pack  $1,200.00

Special Offer Tom Snyder Productions offers a free one month trial of Reading for Meaning as an Internet subscription service. Sign-up for this service at http://reading.tomsnyder.com/readingformeaning/subscription/try.html

Introduction

Reading for Meaning is a software program for 3rd – 8th graders that can support developing reading comprehension skills. The program targets five reading comprehension skills used in standardized testing: the main idea, inference, sequence, cause & effect, and compare & contrast. It also includes teacher resources that can be used to store and monitor students’ work. The program can be used for self-study, in small groups, or with an entire class. [-1-]

The Program

Installation and Getting Started

To install the program, insert the CD-ROM into the CD drive. For Macintosh computers: double-click the installer and follow the on-screen instructions. PC users choose ‘Run’ from the Start menu and then, type D:\SETUP (if ‘D’ is your CD-ROM drive) and follow the on-screen instructions. After installation, launch the program by double-clicking the Reading for Meaning icon that appears on the desktop.

Workspace Files

The first time you use the program choose ‘New Workspace’ from the dialog box and name your Workspace file. If you wish to resume the program at a later time, you can re-launch it by double-clicking your Workspace file icon. Your Workspace file will save your lessons and graphic organizers.

After creating a Workplace file, a welcome screen will be shown; from this screen you can access either Class Activities or Teacher Resources.

Class Activities

Class Activities consist of ‘Whole Class Lessons’ and ‘Graphic Organizers’ (Figure 1).


[Figure 1] Class Activities

Whole Class Lessons

Whole Class Lessons each consist of five Lesson Topics that cover five reading comprehension skills: the main idea, inference, sequence, cause & effect, and compare & contrast (Figure 2). Each Lesson Topic includes one ‘Modeling Lesson’ and six ‘Class Lessons (Literature Lessons)’ (Figure 3).


[Figure 2] Lesson Topics


[Figure 3] Lesson Topic: the Main Idea

Modeling Lessons

Modeling Lessons introduce students to the Lesson Topic, help students learn the lesson format, and prepare them for further lessons. Before class, teachers need to print out the student worksheets by clicking the ‘print worksheet’ icon (Figure 6). The worksheets provide students with four tasks – Watch, Think, Write, and Check – to follow during the lessons, and the lessons themselves are displayed using this four-step process. Each modeling lesson includes a one-page worksheet, examples of which are visible in Figures 4 and 5. [-2-]


[Figure 4] Student worksheet, sample 1


[Figure 5] Student worksheet, sample 2

<
[Figure 6] Print Sheet Icon

Step 1: Watch

For the first step of the modeling lesson, students watch a short animation (3-4 minutes), named ‘KidCam’, that introduces one of the five reading comprehension skills (Figures 7 & 8). A narrator introduces the context of the story and appears two or three times during the movie by pointing out the reading comprehension skill which students need to learn from the lesson. Then, the narrator summarizes the story by using the skill focused on in the lesson. For example, the narrator summarizes the most important events in the animation for sequence lesson.

[Figure 7] Modeling lesson: the Main Idea—Preparing to ‘Watch’ [Figure 8] Modeling lesson: The animation

The animated movie is attractive in that it contains colorful visual clues and sound effects in addition to the narration. This helps students pay attention and prepare for the Class Lesson (Literature lesson).

Step 2: Think

Next, students will have ‘think’ about questions related to the reading comprehension skill being modeled (Figure 9). The questions directly bring the central issue that students are learning through the lessons by guiding them to focus on specific reading comprehension skills. [-3-]

<
[Figure 9] Modeling lesson: ‘Think’

Step 3: Write

Then, students are asked to write their answers to the questions (Figure 10), and, a Graphic Organizer appears (Figure 11). Students can create and save their graphic organizers in their own Workspace file as individuals or small groups. In addition, teachers can create and save whole class organizers into the classroom workspace. The Graphic Organizers saved can be reviewed during the next, ‘Check’ step.

The program includes five types of Graphic Organizers, one designed for each Lesson Topic area. These different organizers allow teachers to effectively target specific skill areas. For example, the Graphic Organizer for the ‘Compare & Contrast’ skill provides effective graphics divided into three parts that prompt students to think of the differences and similarities found in their reading text (Figure 11).


[Figure 10] Modeling Lesson: ‘Write’


[Figure 11] Graphic Organizer

To complete the ‘Write’ activity, students can either work as individuals or in small groups to answer the open-ended questions included in their worksheets; writing must occur on the worksheets because the program does not provide onscreen workspace for writing. During the ‘Write’ step, students can review their graphic organizers to find information needed. Students then share and discuss their responses with the entire class. The ‘Picker’ (available for network users) allows teachers to call on individual students or groups to share their answers with classmates. This helps to create active classroom discussions by offering students oral language presentation experiences (Figure 12).

<
[Figure 12] Random Picker Figure

Step 4: Check

The last step of the modeling lesson is ‘Check’, and the on-screen instructions ask students to check and compare their answers to sample answers. In particular, the sample answers direct students to reflect upon and evaluate their answers focusing on three criteria: answering all parts of the question, using examples from the text, and following good writing rules such as using complete sentences, correct spelling, and good punctuation (Figures 13 & 14). The sample answers supplied are worth 1 point, therefore, teachers need to have students discuss and find what makes good answers that are worth 3 points (note the Point scales under ‘Check’ on the worksheets in Figures 4 and 5) so students can create better answers to the questions. [-4-]


[Figure 13] Sample Answers


[Figure 14] Prompts for Self-evaluation

To complete this ‘Check’ step, students must each have their own worksheet and follow the onscreen instructions. Then, they share their answers with classmates (face-to-face interaction), and evaluate their worksheet responses.

Class Lessons (Literature lessons)

The Literature Lessons contain 30 lesson plans, each consisting of the aforementioned five reading comprehension skills. The pre-task instructions for the Literature Lessons are the same as those for the Modeling Lessons: 1) print out worksheets, 2) create a lesson file (or resume a lesson by clicking an existing file), and 3) start a lesson by following the onscreen instructions. The content format of the Literature Lessons is also the same as the Modeling Lessons, however Literature Lessons use reading text instead of an animation, so the first step in the process is ‘Read’ instead of ‘Watch’. Three pages of student worksheets belong to each Literature Lesson: the first page includes the reading text, the second page includes a graphic organizer (Figure 16), and the third page includes writing questions and a self-evaluation checklist (Figure 17).

Step 1: Read

During the first step students read onscreen captions supported by audio narrations (Figure 15). This helps students to improve their reading fluency (Rasinski, 1990) by giving them opportunities to read and listen simultaneously. Students can reply or pause the reading while they are listening.

<
[Figure 15] Literature Lesson: Read

The texts of the Literature Lessons are excerpted from the literature of several famous authors (e.g., Brothers Grimm) and publishers (e.g., National Geographic WORLD magazine). Therefore, students can experience the authentic reading materials while learning the reading comprehension skills with the program. The Literature Lessons are divided into three different reading levels (Figure 3), each offering a variety of genres. Therefore, teachers can select lessons depending on their students’ reading comprehension level. For example, “The Greedy Dog” (first level) can be used for young learners, while a poem with deeper meaning such as “The Road Not Taken” (third level) may be used for students who possess a higher level of reading comprehension skills. The length of readings varies depending upon the genre but they are shorter than 4 minutes and only one or two paragraphs appears on a screen. No sound effects (such as background music), other than the text narration, are provided in the Literature Lesson. [-5-]

Step 2: Think

To facilitate students’ thinking, the Literature Lessons contain effective Graphic Organizers that help students review the text in mind, generate ideas, and develop each reading comprehension skill based on the readings. The Graphic Organizer shown below is for the lesson on the ‘Sequence’ reading comprehension skill.

<
[Figure 16] Literature Lessons: ‘Think’ Worksheet

Step 3: Write

Like the ‘Write’ step in the Modeling Lesson, students must have a copy of worksheets that include guided questions of what to write (Figure 17). To raise students’ ideas, it is suggested there be a class discussion before they work as individuals or in small groups. Then, they are asked to share their answers with the entire class.

<
[Figure 17] Literature Lesson: Write & Check Worksheet

Step 4: Check

To check their answers, students use the same strategy practiced in the Modeling Lessons. Based on three samples answers provided on-screen (refer to Figure 13), students can compare their responses. The sample answers are not provided as a perfect answer key, rather they serve as models for students. Then, students will use the chart at the bottom of the ‘Write and Check’ worksheet to evaluate their own answers (Figure 17). [-6-]

Class Activities: Graphic Organizers

As previously noted in the Modeling Lesson, Reading for Meaning provides five types of graphic organizers designed for five essential reading comprehension skills. In addition to the graphic organizers for the Modeling Lessons and Class Lessons, the program provides five Blank Graphic Organizers that can be used along with any other reading materials. Students can create and save their own organizers into their workspace file. Also, teachers can create and save a classroom organizer through the whole classroom discussion.

Teacher Resources

Reading for Meaning provides two teacher resources: The ‘file manager’ and the ‘lesson plan library’.

File Manager

The File Manager stores all lesson files and graphic organizer files. With the File Manager, teachers can see graphic organizers created by the whole class, small groups or individual students. Therefore, File Manager allows teachers to review and monitor students’ work in progress.

<
[Figure 18] File Manager: Lessons

Lesson Plan Library

The Lesson Plan Library contains 30 lesson plans that include student worksheets and can be sorted by title, author, and topic (Figure 19). The worksheets for these additional lessons can only be viewed as hardcopy printouts and cannot be viewed onscreen; the program only provides the ‘Lesson Plan Summary’ onscreen (Figure 20). Each lesson plan worksheet consists of four pages: Lesson Plan Summary, Think, Write and Check, and an Answer Key. [-7-]


[Figure 19] Lesson Plan Library


[Figure 20] Lesson Plan Summary

By clicking the ‘print’ icon in a Lesson Plan summary screen, teachers can create the handout worksheets.

Program Evaluation

Strengths

Research-based Approach

Reading for Meaning is developed based on many research evidences for reading instruction that show the effectiveness of: (1) teaching explicit reading instruction (Palinscar and Brown, 1984; Langer, 2000), (2) using semantic mapping systems such as Graphic Organizers (Merkley & Jeffries, 2001), and (3) indirect vocabulary teaching through reading and discussions (CIERA, 2001).

First of all, the program clearly demonstrates specific reading skills, strategies, and processes to students. Its explicit instruction, which corresponds to cognitive strategies, should enhance students’ reading comprehension. The Modeling Lessons allow teachers to model each skill for the students, allowing them to eventually apply the skills to their own reading. In turn, all students, both native English speakers and English language learners (ELLs) can internalize essential reading comprehension skills. Also, the program effectively helps students organize and remember the most important text information by providing well-designed Graphic Organizers. Furthermore, the program helps students to learn vocabulary by providing indirect ways such as encouraging self-reading and discussion activities.

Multi-levels and Multi-literatures

Reading for Meaning covers a broad range of literature and various genres such as articles, folktales, myths, fairy tales, autobiographies, stories, and poetry. Furthermore, because the program consists of three different levels of literature, teachers can adapt the program for students with different needs.

Flexible Use

The program can be used in a variety of classroom or school settings. In a classroom, it can be used to teach whole classes, small groups, or individuals. If only one computer is available, the teacher can create one Workspace file for each class. Alternatively, if multiple computers are available, the teacher can lead a group of students or an individual through the process of creating their own Workspace file. With this flexibility, teachers may effectively enhance teaching and learning in reading lessons within their classroom and/or school context.

Teacher Resources

The two teaching tools noted earlier, File manager and Lesson Plan Library help teachers prepare and teach their lessons, increasing teaching effectiveness and convenience. In particular, the File Manager allows teachers to review and monitor students’ work. The Lesson Plan Library helps teachers save time preparing their lessons by allowing them to focus on a specific reading skill and genre of literature according to their students’ needs.

Weaknesses

Print Restriction

The program does not allow users to review the worksheets onscreen; it is only possible to see them as hardcopy printouts. For example, students cannot directly write their answers on the computers during the Write step, rather they can only type on the screen when they work on Graphic Organizers. However, it would make the lessons more interactive if students could respond directly on the screen and share their writing responses via a network. This printing restriction may also make it difficult for teachers to plan their lessons in advance at any location without a printer. [-8-]

Text-only Literature

The program provides only plain text through all the Literature Lessons. This may diminish student motivation and offer less incentive for those who are easily distracted from the text. If the program provided support graphics, such as picture cues, in the reading text it would be beneficial to the student who needs more scaffolding in reading lessons. To overcome this weakness of the program teachers might need to consider providing a variety of cues (e.g., pictures, body language, gestures, and intonation) when they use the program.

Internet-Access Requirements: Limited Network Accessibility

The Reading for Meaning program offers a different network option depending on the number of computers using the program, for 30 or more computers. Therefore, if a school has 30 computers using the program, all the computers can be networked together. In this case, the school should be available to provide network space under the school server so that teachers and students can afford to store their Workspace files. This is one of advantages of the program. However, if schools do not have their own server, the program also cannot be fully used without networking.

On the other hand, smaller numbers of users (less than 30 computers) cannot be set up with the network connection. In this case, all users (teachers and students) are not able to share their workspace file in a common network station. Therefore, this feature of the program cannot be employed.

Conclusion

According to the publisher, the learning objectives of Reading for Meaning correlate to the IRA/ NCTE Standards for English Language Arts (http://www.ncte.org/print.asp?id=110846&node=204), including a range of literature genres, strategies, and frequent opportunities for students to talk and write. Because of this reason, it will be advantageous for both ELLs and native English speakers for developing reading comprehension skills required for school learning.

In addition, the many small group and classroom discussion opportunities offered by the program will create more interactive classroom environments facilitating collaborative talk (Carmen, 1998) among students (e.g., small group discussions). In particular, ELLs who need more language experiences in the classroom will benefit by the interactive and collaborative work opportunities while they are developing reading comprehension skills.

Even though the program provides many advantages for all students, however, the successful application of the software will depend on how teachers manage it. Because the effective literacy instruction is not simply a collection of strategies, the learning environment in which teachers create to facilitate ELLs’ academic English language proficiency will also be a key factor for the most effective use of the program. Therefore, to create an optimal classroom learning environment and the most effective use of the program, teachers must devote their effort to choose reading materials that are the most appropriate for their students. Next, teachers need to adapt the strategies for their particular situation, if the learners differ in age or need. Finally, teachers need to give students plenty of opportunities to read independently and to practice the strategies employed by the program during the lesson.

Good teaching is teaching for all (Drucker, 2003, p. 22). However, again, teachers should keep in mind the fact that some strategies may be more important than others, depending on the specific circumstance.

References

Carmen, S. (1998). Classroom strategies for encouraging collaborative discussion. Directions in Language and Education, 12.

Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA). (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Drucker, M. J. (2003). What reading teachers should know about ESL learners. The Reading Teacher, 57 (1), 22-29.

Langer, J. (2000). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement.

Merkley, D. M., & Jeffries, D. (2001). Guidelines for implementing a graphic organizer. The Reading Teacher, 54, 350-357.

Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.

Rasinski, T. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 147-150.

About the Reviewer

Keun Huh is a doctoral candidate at Washington State University whose research interests are computer-assisted language learning and ESL. She developed online teacher training courses for English Language Learners (ELLs) under a Training of All Teachers (Toat) grant, and is currently developing online ESL courses for pre-service teachers.

Keun Huh
Washington State University
Pullman, Washington, USA
keunhmail.wsu.edu

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-9-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.