• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

ESOL Tests and Testing


December 2005 – Volume 9, Number 3

ESOL Tests and Testing

Author: Stephen Stoynoff and Carol A. Chapelle (2005)  
Publisher: Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL
Pages ISBN Price
Pp Viii + 206 1931185166 $29.95 (member $21.95)

Before getting into the little things of this book, l would like to begin this review with a real anecdote that happened to me not too long ago. Some months ago, while I was in my office, a colleague came in and asked me a couple of questions about language testing, and I must recognize that after 30 minutes of explanations and exemplification, he thanked me for my help and left me unconvinced and wondering. Two days after, later I received this book and went to talk to him and I asked him to read the first chapter. Two days later, he came back to me and said: “Jesús, this is what I needed to know, why didn’t you tell me in the beginning?” I wonder how many ESOL, TESOL, and TEFL teachers feel the same way as my colleague. In ESOL Tests and Testing, Stoynoff and Chapelle assume the point of view of those ESOL practitioners somehow engaged in language testing (not few times, accidentally) who need to gain “access to principles, methods, and the language of language assessment” (p. V).

There are two books on language testing that I have especially enjoyed: This ESOL Tests and Testing, and McNamara’s Language Testing (2000). While the second is almost exclusively aimed at professionals who devote their work to testing (as testing instructors), this book caught my attention immediately because it is very difficult to find a good introductory book in language testing. A few years after McNamara’s Language Testing was published, ESOL Tests and Testing, along with Burgess and Head’s How to Teach for Exams (2005) with very different purposes, has probably become the best introductory book for prospective and on-the-job practitioners in language testing. Apart from a great first chapter, in which the writers give a complete and still easy-to-follow introduction to the field of language testing, the book has a collection of well-known names in the field that review the most important high stakes language tests.

In the first chapter, the authors describe the process of language tests and testing practices in detail explaining its implications from language acquisition to washback in a clear and friendly way, probably based on the idea that not all practitioners involved in testing are really familiar with the subject matter. This fact is also clear as the writers show a number of introductory issues such as distinctions between the role of teachers and testers (p. 2) in language testing, the current educational practices in fashion, educational theory, and some introduction to language research and practice. All these topics are used as initial information for understanding the rest of the chapter, which, as mentioned above, is devoted to lead the reader to understand the complex process of testing and its relation to assessment and evaluation.

The following chapter in the book gives “an overview of useful sources of information on language testing followed by reviews of 20 language tests” (p. 25) by some of the top language testing specialists, including Sari Luoma, Micheline Chalhoub-Deville, Carsten Roever, Keith Morrow, and many others. Reviews are structured as an inventory that includes: test purpose, test methods, and the test use justification. In general each review also provides information of the accredited institution that runs the test, the publication of the first review of each test, the target population to whom it is aimed and the current cost. Additionally, this chapter gives information of online resources (p. 26), where to find the inventories with the labels of different tests distributed all over the world (p. 27), and mentions the Handbook of English Language Proficiency tests. Probably, the largest drawback of this chapter is its lack of exhaustive literature review of each test. Of course, a few studies are mentioned, but almost none of the reviewers really shows the current state of the art in any of the tests. There is little question that these descriptions would have made a difference if bibliographical information of each test had been added at the end of each review. Nevertheless, the chapter is well justified and valuable for teachers and trainers of language testing who sometimes may ignore even the existence or format of some of these tests. One other thing that caught my attention was the form to choose the tests for review. As the authors mention, they were selected through “a telephone survey of a random, stratified sample of 160 current TESOL members to learn which commercial language tests were most widely used” (p. 30). Despite this unusual way of choosing the tests, it feels like the ones selected include the most significant ones. However, I find it controversial to omit the complete Cambridge Exams set (including, KETS, First Certificate, CAE, Proficiency).

The following three chapters address  practical issues as “Using the test manual to learn more about a test” (Chapter 3, p. 109), “Evaluating the usefulness of tests” (Chapter 4, p. 137) or “Deciding to develop a test” (Chapter 5, p. 153). Of these three, Chapter 3 is the one that seems to provide the least new information. In fact, as I read this chapter, I felt that probably the message that writers were conveying was the importance of really getting to know a test before beginning to use it in your institution. Apart from that, one has the feeling that maybe the book did not need this chapter. But, in my professional career I have also seen that  few colleges and public institutions make decisions about the tests they recommend to their students without knowing the implications of the choice. It would also be desirable that test preparation textbooks included this type of information, at least, in the instructor’s book.

I found Chapter 4 most interesting. These thirteen pages summarize concisely criteria for evaluating tests and, somehow, propose some specific items that can help prospective educational authorities to choose tests that may be adequate to their needs (p. 150). To achieve their purpose, the writers follow two main approaches: a description of the Validation Theory application to test manuals (pp. 138-40) and their own approach to evaluate tests usefulness according to features such as reliability, construct validity, authenticity, interactiveness, impact, practicality, and test fairness. Two more items are used to demonstrate and summarize their thoughts: a sample of usefulness analysis from the Iowa State University ESL program, and some practical advice for the reader with a very interesting table (p. 150) that will help to form opinions about the validity of a test.

Chapter 5 is practical and enjoyable because it proposes a set of guidelines for creating one’s own test, explaining the general failures detected in other tests (pp. 153-5), and identifying the characteristics and actions that can be taken to obtain reliable and objective tests. As they point out: “Our intent is not to give comprehensive instructions for the developing tests but rather to give an overview of key aspects of the process and suggestions on where to obtain additional help” (p. 153).

This excellent book has also three positive aspects that enhance its value for both professionals just beginning in the field and those with more expertise who may have failed to understand fully the world of testing: first, a good annotated bibliography of important books in the field by the most significant researchers; second, a clear bibliography of the references mentioned throughout the book; and third, the topic index. A glossary would be useful, because although the terms are defined in each section in general, at times some key concepts can be difficult to understand. It would also have been advisable to include a comparative table of the levels of the Common European Framework of Languages (Burgess & Head, 2005, p. 157) or the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and their correspondence with the tests under revision.

On the whole, however, ESOL Tests and Testing is a valuable reference book of the many issues involved in language testing. Readers starting in testing or specialists in the field will find its simplicity and friendly style useful and informative alike and, thus, will find it worth reading. In just a few words, it is a highly recommended introductory book in the challenging and attractive field of language testing.

References

Burgess, S. & Head, K. (2005). Teach for exams. London: Longman.

Del Vecchio, A. & Guerrero, M. (1995). Handbook of language proficiency tests.

Retrieved October 13, 2005:  http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/eacwest/elptests.htm

McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Jesús García Laborda
<jgarcialidm.upv.es>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.