• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

The Tapestry of Language Learning: The Individual in the Communicative Classroom

Vol. 1. No. 3 — March 1995

The Tapestry of Language Learning: The Individual in the Communicative Classroom

Robin C. Scarcella and Rebecca L. Oxford (1992)
Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers
Pp. 228. ISBN 0-8384-2359-0 (paper)
US $18.00

The Tapestry of Language Learning is the cornerstone of a new series from Heinle and Heinle that ‘combine[s] communicative, thematic, task-based learning with a concern for students’ individual differences’ (p. v). The text sets out the authors’ philosophy about language teaching and language learning in a classroom setting. Although the tapestry metaphor is sometimes strained, the text provides a solid overview of the communicative approach to ESL instruction as it is often practiced in the United States and Canada.

The text is divided into three parts. Part I provides an overview of the Tapestry approach. Part II summarizes the authors’ positions on second language acquisition theories and learner characteristics. Part III deals with language skills, including grammar and culture.

The Tapestry of Language Learning does not focus on language acquisition theory or research. The authors focus on classroom practice, particularly in the adult academic or pre-academic ESL classroom. As an overview, it succeeds admirably, touching on most of the issues that concern active ESL teachers. The authors present a consistent viewpoint throughout, drawing heavily on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximate Development (Vygotsky, 1978) and Canale and Swain’s (1980) discussion of communicative language teaching. The authors strongly advocate integrative skills classes and content- based instruction (although the last half of the book treats the traditional skills separately). Each chapter contains pre-reading questions and post-reading activities that provide useful triggers for discussion or learning log entries. My teacher trainees responded especially well to the section on teacher roles.

The text, however, has more breadth than depth. Chapters and sections alike are short. Many sections are only two or three sentences long, giving the reader a rushed, breathless feeling. In spite of the authors’ impressive research records, they provide few details on the research results that led them to develop this approach. The skills chapters are particularly thin, with much material repeated. Even the section on learning styles and strategies, which were covered so admirably in Oxford (1990), only brushes the surface. I found the chapter on language development particularly frustrating. The descriptions of competing theories are not thorough enough to give readers a clear understanding of the concepts involved.
[-1-]

I used the text last year for an undergraduate teacher training class. Most of the students were trainees; most had not done a practicum. While the pre-reading questions stimulated many thoughtful journal entries, the post-reading activities were often too general or seemed to assume a basis of teaching experience that my students lacked. I also felt the students were frustrated by the lack of concrete detail in some chapters. Most of my students were planning to work with children in bilingual situations, and the text dealt very little with their concerns. The book also shows a strong US-Canada bias; teachers who must deal with the more structural methods often prevalent in other countries will find little help in adapting the Tapestry approach to their situations.

While I admit to having a bias against ‘name brand methods,’ the Tapestry Approach is sound overall. The insistence on meaningful interaction can never be strong enough when it is so easy for teachers to fall back on more structural approaches. Scarcella and Oxford also stress that communicative competence includes grammatical competence, to the extent of including a chapter on teaching grammar (but not other linguistic sub-skills). The textbooks that Heinle & Heinle has published under the Tapestry imprint are interesting, attractive books that won universally positive reviews from my teacher trainees. If this is any indication, the approach will acquire followers easily.

However, as a teacher trainer, I wished for more heft in the weave. I would like to see more depth in research support and classroom application. A text that advocates a comprehensive approach to language teaching should give more help to teachers who are just starting out. New teachers are the most open to new ideas, but the least able to put them into practice. They often fall prey to the habits learned when they were language students themselves. They can’t always imagine innovative ways to ‘make writing fun’ (p. 134) and they often don’t understand the political or administrative reasons for segregated skills courses (p. 92). The book might be more profitably used for in-service training, after teachers have some real-world experience to inform their discussions. It should be required reading for the administrators who evaluate language teachers, but who are not specialists in language teaching or acquisition.

I welcome the Tapestry series to the arsenal of ESL teaching materials, and The Tapestry of Language Learning is a respectable contribution to ESL teacher training. No text can be all things to every audience, and Scarcella and Oxford have drawn together many threads to create a picture of a language classroom that is communicative, productive, and caring. [-2-]

References

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, Inc.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Marianne Phinney
InfoSoft International
<mphinney@insonotes1.hmco.com>

[-3-]


© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page in the paginated ASCII version of this article, which is the definitive edition. Please use these page numbers when citing this work.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.