• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Key Words for Fluency: Learning and Practising the Most Useful Words of English

March 2007 — Volume 10, Number 4

 


Key Words for Fluency: Learning and Practising
the Most Useful Words of English,
3 vols.

Author: George Woolard (2004, 2005)  
Publisher: London : Thomson ELT
Pages ISBN Price
Pre-intermediate 200 0-7593-9629-9
Intermediate 196 0-7593-9628-0
Upper Intermediate 175 0-7593-9627-2
Price: $22.00 U.S. each

The aim of this three book series is to work on collocations so as to improve vocabulary, necessary to achieve fluency in all four skills: speaking, listening, reading and writing. The books are addressed to learners and definitely not for class use but, rather, for self-study, thanks to a very simple structure and answer keys.

According to the author, key words are “the most common and useful words in English” and thus “the most important” to learn, all the more so as “they combine with lots of other words in short expressions”. He defines collocations as “the grammar of words”: “how words go together with other words”. To him, nouns are more important than any other type of words and carry most of the meaning, most of what we are talking about. Hence, the material is organised around key nouns, 270 in the first book, 208 in the second, 145 in the third plus 20 expressions on the model a + noun + of. With such numbers, these books are quite a rich resource: about 650 nouns altogether generating roughly 10,000 expressions.

Book 1 (pre-intermediate) presents 270 of the most useful, basic words, organised by topic in 22 sections (“Your house”, “Rooms and furniture”, “In the kitchen”, etc.) and totalling 2,500 expressions. The student can work on one topic per day and/or refer to it when the topic in a class matches one in the book. There is a test at the end of each section and, at the end of the book, the answer key is followed–for quick reference–by an alphabetical list of words with the pages on which they appear. The book is meant to be good preparation for the PET examination. For each noun, there is a list of collocations in a box, divided into categories: verb + keyword, or keyword + noun, or adjective + key word, or common expressions and sometimes prepositional phrases. Only two types of exercises are provided: matching the halves and fill in the blanks. Both are reassuring because familiar after a few pages and the answer can only be right or wrong, but extremely tedious for learners who prefer a more varied approach.

The main problem with this type of execution is that the collocations are not explained, so to do the exercises, the student, who may not yet know many words at the pre-intermediate level, has to do a huge amount of work with a dictionary or thesaurus first. For example, under the word “beach” we find “stroll along the beach” or “something is washed up on the beach”. In the drawing illustrating the former collocation the idea of strolling is not made any clearer because its difference with “walking” is impossible to show in a drawing in which speed of movement cannot be seen. Furthermore, the collocations are only used once in the exercises, not enough for acquisition. These exercises would have to be done several times and I am not sure there are many learners motivated enough to go through the same material time and time again, especially in self-study. Lastly, the forms and tenses of the verbs used cover the whole range: the present simple, the preterit, past participle of irregular verbs, the gerund, the passive, etc. Who has mastered these forms at this stage?

Book 2 (intermediate) is also organised into 22 sections with a number of one-page units in each, but without tests. For example, section 4 called “Work” offers one page on “job”, one on “career”, one on “staff and duty”, etc. The 200 or so words generate over 3,000 expressions. The level reached is that of the FCE examination. The format is the same as in Book 1: fill-in the-blanks with three to six collocations chosen from a box at the top and match-the-halves exercises. There are notes providing more collocations at the end of every page.

Book 3 (upper intermediate) is organised around key words in alphabetical order, one per page with four exercises on each page, and expressions at the end. The boxes at the top of each page in the other books have been replaced by a short list of collocations at the beginning of each exercise. Notes at the end of each page are of a kind with those in Book 2.

Two things are worth mentioning about the books’ drawings. First, as mentioned above, visuals, while they make for a more attractive page, are not explanatory in themselves and can even create confusion. On page 106 of Book 1 we find pictures of a tall, slim black man lying on the beach (the only black person to make an appearance in the books among various Caucasians.) The sentence associated with this picture is: I’ve got a great body. To most students at the pre-intermediate level, the meaning of great is the opposite of small and here we have a tall man. The idea of handsome, beautiful is not necessarily generated by the picture. Similarly, the little fishy things shown in the picture p. 85 are indiscernible and do not help understanding the expression. Still in Book I, which deals with very basic vocabulary, while the words are really basic, the collocations are not necessarily so: a clutch bag and a cake stand are easily understood because illustrated by drawings, but are these words really useful at this stage?

Secondly, there is one obvious shortcoming in all three books: too often, the pictures created for the books by Anna Macleod for the first and Bill Stott for the other two, use basic gender stereotypes: a woman flops into a chair after some heavy shopping (for clothes, not groceries) while a man leans back and puts his feet up at the office (real work). Women spend time in tearooms eating cakes while men stand at the bar drinking beer. Women are confined to home activities such as making the beds, drawing the curtains, cooking, taking care of the children, while men earn a living as soldiers, policemen, waiters (in chic restaurants), teachers (full of wisdom and experience), orchestra conductors. In their leisure time, women read fashion magazines, play tennis awkwardly, file their nails, put on lipstick. Men spend an afternoon fishing, paint a fence, drive big fast cars and . . . wait for women who are late. Still, there is an exception to this heap of clichés: a kiss between two men.

If we look at the sentences in the exercises at random, when gender is represented in Book 1, we find the same stereotyping: a man looks at himself in the mirror to try on a new suit; a woman never leaves the house without looking at herself in the hall mirror. In Book 2, 36 pictures show men and only seven women, with both men and women in thirteen and nine pictures of inanimate objects. In Book 3, there is a preponderance of he and his when gender is mentioned (mostly we have neutral words such as I, you, we, they). A president is associated with his country (p. 76, 3:6); a secretary is female (p. 77, 1:3). The subliminal message of this accumulation of gender stereotypes, to which must be added the lack of racial diversity, is not educational. Rather, it reinforces prejudice, and educators should be more aware than this. Materials writers and pedagogues should in particular pay attention to this.

I wonder if books such as Woolard’s are still of any use in book form. Their presentation is attractive (especially the covers) but it seems to me the monotony of the material does not help reconcile web-addicts to paper. Such mechanical exercises would be perfectly suited for Internet pages, with all the additional help this medium can offer: hypertext, pronunciation, video illustrations, songs, etc. I am not sure students–of any age–are going to buy such material in a bookshop, or, if they do, that they will really learn from it.

Nicole Décuré
LAIRDIL–Université de Toulouse, France
<decurecict.fr>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.