• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Academic Listening Encounters: American Studies

June 2009 – Volume 13, Number 1


Academic Listening Encounters: American Studies

Author: Kim Sanabria & Carlos Sanabria (2008)
Publisher: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. xxv + 164 978-0-521-68432-3 (paper) $29.00 U.S.

The overall goal of Academic Listening Encounters: American Studies is to introduce intermediate level high school and university students to American history and culture through a “listening, note taking, and discussion” (p. xix) based text that will give a “realistic sense of studying in an academic course” – and teach TOEFL iBT skills (p. xvii). The Sanabrias method attempts to have students “encounter concepts and terminology that overlap and grow more complex” (p. xvii) as their textbook progresses through five units of two chapters each. Each chapter is broken down into a four part format: “Getting Started,” “American Voices,” “In Your Own Voice,” and “Academic Listening and Note Taking,” the last section being the one in which the students listen to long, two-part lectures. Each part becomes slightly more difficult, so as to build vocabulary and academic concepts while also allowing for immediate use of new knowledge in discussions, most of which are partner based.

Each unit discusses a new theme of American culture or cultural development.

Unit Title Focus
1 “Laws of the Land” U.S. Constitution, government structure and the Bill of Rights
2 “A Diverse Nation” “Old” (European) and “new” (rest of the world) immigration
3 “The Struggle for Equality” Equality (gender- and race-based) and the 1960s Civil Rights Movement
4 “American Values” Past (1950s America) and present, and intergenerational controversy
5 “Spotlight on Culture” Cultural change, including a brief overview of the globalization of American culture and the rise of EFL

One of the strengths of this book is the “Getting Started” sections. A short reading passage introduces and narrows the chapter topic; then strategies crucial for test taking listening skills are covered. They show how to listen for important information, such as dates and percentages. However, these strategies appear only in Units 1 and 2 and half of Unit 3. The authors missed a terrific opportunity to add notetaking examples, e.g. abbreviations, to this section to help students with the sections containing interview and lectures.

The next section, “American Voices,” is a terrific combination of test taking skills and everyday (or contextualized) language. It is composed of interviews that allow students to hear vocabulary words in context. In selected excerpts new vocabulary is given in bold within quotes from the interviews along with synonyms and a definition to help students grasp new words even faster. Next, students are asked to answer basic comprehension questions, and lastly move on to questions asking for their responses to the interviews. These questions set up the discussion based section of “In Your Own Voice” (which I will return to later).

The last section of each chapter, “Academic Listening and Note Taking,” is designed to mimic classroom and test lectures. Students are asked to take notes and respond to academic lectures on chapter related topics, for example “Checks and Balances” and “Globalization of American Slang.” The students are provided with model notes which are partially filled in with abbreviations to help students along. For example, “Checks and Balances” has words like freedom already abbreviated as “F’dom,” leaving students to fill in “F’dom of __________” as “F’dom of speech” while they listen to the lecture (p. 29). After the lecture, the students are then asked to answer questions and then work with partners to compare their (completed) notes. To practice at home, the students are provided with a transcript of all the lectures on the CD that comes with the student book. This section seems to be great preparation for students entering university classrooms. On the other hand, this same section lacks an adequate amount of test taking practice that would be beneficial to intermediate EFL students, instead only asking students to apply their knowledge in a classroom setting. One has a right to be surprised by this oversight, since one of the announced goals of the book is to teach TOEFL iBT skills.

The third section, “In Your Own Voice,” asks students to revisit or recall their responses to the interviews from “American Voices,” support them, and then make a presentation. I think this section would be more effective if it came last. “In Your Own Voice” ask students to “take creative control of the topic at hand” (p. xxi) prior to completing all the knowledge gathering process, i.e., listening to each chapter’s lecture on the same topic. With this section coming third instead of last, it asks students to make a partially informed response.

The authors take on a tough task with this book. The book’s controversial issues—immigration, racial/gender equality, and American values—are no longer seen in the same ideological light they once were: for example, while immigration was once an invisible topic in the United States, it is now a very heated debate around highly publicized immigration battles that have polarized at least part of the U.S. Even more importantly, the book, particularly chapters 5 and 6, sometimes treat ideas of equality at a middle school classroom level, never really rising to a level of critical analysis university and university-bound students will need. Instead, the book remains on the surface of its topics and avoids going into much detail: for example the Jim Crow laws are only presented as something that has been overcome, not as a historical representation of the overall racial attitude of the United States up to the time of their repeal.

Another example of oversimplification comes in Chapter 8’s discussion of Conservative and Liberal values. The lecture sticks to a stereotypical portrayal of the two sides’ values, not critically discussing how they have evolved. Liberal values are connected to the Democratic party and conservative values to the Republican party. The lecturer discusses the shifting of support of Democrats to the Republican party from 1964 to 1984 and their renewed support in 2000, while never developing the key historical reasons for the shift or discussing party diversity (p. 127). This could be seen as a total negative, but, I think, herein lies the true value of this book as a pedagogical tool. What it lacks in detailed note-taking skills, critical vocabulary, or depth, it more than makes up for in its stress on discussion as a necessary and demanding academic skill. The use of the interviews and lectures to spark discussion is truly the highlight of this book, as it is sure to engage students and require them to use all their new, albeit limited, knowledge immediately.

James Smith
Chung Dahm Holdings, Mapo-gu, South Korea
<smithj57atmarkgmail.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.