• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Perspectives on Community College ESL: Volume 3–Faculty, Administration, and the Working Environment

December 2009 – Volume 13, Number 3

Perspectives on Community College ESL
Volume 3: Faculty, Administration, and the Working Environment

Author: Jose A. Carmona (Ed.) (2008).
Craig Machado, Series Editor
 
Publisher: Washington, DC: TESOL
Pages ISBN Price
pp. vi + 195 978-193118549-3 (paper) $22.95 U.S. for TESOL members;
$31.95 for non-members

Volume 3 of the Perspectives on Community College ESL series, entitled Faculty, Administration, and the Working Environment, explores a variety of issues related to teaching ESL at community colleges. The 15 chapters focus on five primary areas: teaching and culture, support for adjunct faculty, collaborative efforts at the college, uses of technology, and employment conditions. The resulting volume comprises diverse perspectives on the strengths, challenges, and realities of community college ESL.

The first section, Teachers, Culture, and Pedagogy, addresses the marginalization of non-native English speaking teachers and students. In the first chapter, Maum provides an overview of issues facing non-native English-speaking teachers in the workplace (NNESTs) and outlines the unique strengths they bring to the ESL profession. To raise awareness of those strengths and minimize marginalization, Maum proposes collaboration between NNESTs and their native-speaking colleagues in the workplace and teacher-training programs. Park (Ch. 2) addresses the issue of NNESTs from a more personal perspective. She describes her development as a multi-competent teacher, whereby she was able to exploit her own language-learning and intercultural experiences as a non-native English speaker to better meet the needs of her students. Essential to her professional development was the mentorship of her program director who encouraged Park to critically reflect on her own learning experiences to inform her teaching. These chapters serve to introduce the central themes of the book, namely, the lack of recognition of ESL teachers as professionals and the resulting need for increased institutional support. The final chapter in this section (Ch. 3) explores how teachers and administrators can promote retention of ESL students as they transition to mainstream classes. McGrath enumerates the challenges facing both ESL students and content-area faculty who are often under-equipped to work together effectively. He then outlines ways to ease students’ transitions, including support courses and texts, tutors, and ESL sections of English courses. Although McGrath mentions the need for content faculty to attend ESL workshops, I was left wanting more specific strategies for facilitating deeper institutional commitments to address the needs of ESL students. Community colleges must turn to more innovative and sustainable strategies which will ultimately require a substantial commitment by all faculty to adapt their teaching practices. Carmona (Ch. 4) provides an administrator’s perspective on the development of a multi-level language literacy class for adult students at a community college in Florida. By helping students strengthen their Spanish and English literacy skills simultaneously, the program addressed a key barrier to these students’ pursuit of educational goals at the college. As a whole, this section lacked a strong coherent thread, which speaks to the complexity and diversity of issues facing community colleges.

Part Two outlines the many challenges associated with adjunct work and proposes strategies to mitigate those challenges. Chapter 5 chronicles the experiences of one of the authors, Sacharow, as she finishes her MA TESOL program and begins adjunct work at a community college.  Many who have worked as adjuncts will relate to Sacharow’s account, from the initial warm welcome at the new faculty orientation to her ensuing sense of isolation and marginalization. What made the difference for Sacharow was the mentorship of a full-time faculty member.  In addition to mentoring, the authors present some concrete suggestions to better integrate adjuncts and increase collegiality. Nehrebecki (Ch. 6) adopts a broader view of adjunct support as encompassing curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment. She describes how the development and implementation of unified assessment for an ESL program in New Jersey provided much needed support for adjunct faculty while also increasing student pass rates.  This section demonstrates how increased adjunct support is necessary for both faculty retention and program integrity.

Part Three focuses on collaboration between community college ESL programs and other educational entities. In one of the volume’s most interesting chapters, Ford (Ch. 7) describes a joint research project conducted by a community college ESL program and a university in Hawaii to address the needs of the growing population of developmental bilingual students in the college ESL program. This chapter presents a constructive example of how collaborative research can bridge the gap between teachers and researchers in ways that benefit everyone, especially students. Ch. 8 highlights the benefits of collaboration between academic ESL, developmental education, and administration to promote higher retention of at-risk students. With the help of federal funds, a college in North Carolina developed a week-long training for teachers of developmental English courses for this purpose, which resulted in higher retention rates.  Since the federal funding did not include academic ESL teachers, the institution came up with its own monies to pay ESL faculty to attend the training. I would have liked to see the impact of this training on ESL student retention.  The last chapter in this section (Ch. 9) describes the collaborative efforts of community college education faculty (ESL and elementary/exceptional education specialists) to better prepare pre-service teachers for K-12 instructional contexts. The teacher training program worked with the local school district to provide pre-service teachers with opportunities for observation and mentorship.  As a whole, the section demonstrates how collaboration among educational sectors can make significant improvements at the program and institutional levels.

Part 4 looks at the ways in which technology can enhance teaching and learning. Reynard (Ch. 10) describes the development and implementation of an online version of a federally funded ESL correspondence course in Ontario, Canada.  Despite the careful design of the program and initial support by faculty and students, it was not as successful as anticipated, which Reynard ascribes to inadequate teacher training.  In Ch. 11, Giambrone explores how technology can mitigate teacher burnout by offering some concrete examples of online resources and course design options to reinvigorate one’s teaching practice.

The final section, Working Environment, explores the benefits and challenges of community college employment. While serious problems persist, the view presented here is not wholly disheartening. Sun (Ch. 12) reviews the results of several surveys which investigate ESL employment conditions in the state of Washington, nationally and globally. The data suggest persistence over the last decade of inequity in working conditions and pay and lack of access to professional development. On a brighter note, the Washington study prompted a large-scale advocacy effort which resulted in some improvements in these areas, especially increased salary and decreased workload. Sharla Jones (Ch. 13) explains how administrative decisions at a community college in Texas undermined the integrity of the ESL program.  The administration made significant changes to the ESL department without the input of any ESL faculty, which was a departure from the procedures of working with other departments at the college.  In the concluding chapter, Petro provides a first-hand account of her decision to leave her university teaching position to join the tenure-track faculty of a community college. Petro cites job security and professional respect as advantages to her move.  However, the disadvantages she describes—a high teaching load, standardized testing, and lack of credit for ESL courses—are not unique to community colleges.

Together, these chapters explore a wide spectrum of possibilities and contradictions inherent in community colleges.  Because of the breadth of topics addressed in each chapter, however, some authors had difficulty maintaining a clear focus. I had to reread often to reorient myself to the main thread of a specific article. Despite minor flaws of focus, this compilation will be very helpful to anyone involved in the world of community college ESL by articulating common challenges and providing strategies to improve them.

Erin-Kate Murphy
Peninsula College, Florida, USA
ekmurphypencol.edu

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.