• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

How Myths about Language Affect Education: What Every Teacher Should Know

December 2009 — Volume 13, Number 3

How Myths about Language Affect Education: What Every Teacher Should Know

Author: David Johnson (2008)  
Publisher: Ann Arbor: U. of Michigan Press
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. v + 113 978-0-472-03287-7 (paper) $22.50 U.S.

How Myths about Language Affect Education is a small but powerful book that examines common stereotypes and misinformation about language and language learning that affect students, instructors, schools, and the general public, especially in U.S. contexts. The thesis of this book is clearly defined by the author who writes: “ESL teachers should work to debunk popular and misguided myths that dominate the general public’s understanding of language” (p. 1). Thus, Myths, focuses on providing the information that will allow ESL instructors to resist the misinformation surrounding language teaching and learning in general, and English language teaching in particular. The book itself is divided into a series of chapters focusing on macro-myths about language including myths about first language acquisition; myths about second language acquisition; myths about language and society; and myths about language and thinking. Each chapter includes two to five sub-myths which are subsequently explored as individual issues.

How Myths about Language Affect Language is a useful resource for debunking misinformation. It is, furthermore, noteworthy for the participatory and reflective activities and additional resources included in each chapter. For example, one such activity asks teachers to video tape their class and have the classes analyze the tape for differences in dialect and their perceptions of persons speaking those dialects. Thus, Myths moves from passively lecturing readings about language teaching and learning to engage students and teachers in a hands-on approach in the debunking of the language myths themselves. Moreover, Johnson not only examines the myths as they relate to understanding a language, but also as the myths that relate to the perception of a specific language and as they relate to language teaching and learning. For example, he explores the myth of languages having only one correct form; he analyzes the myths surrounding languages and dialects supposedly being determined by race: and he critiques the notion that the media is corrupting the English language.

How Myths about Language Affect Education also addresses other societal issues such as the notion that by becoming the official language in the U.S.A., English would unify the country. Instead, the author suggests that “language takes care of itself” (p. 80) and that attempts at regulating language or forcing others to speak only one language are forms of racial or ethnic oppression. This is an important idea to understand especially for individuals responsible for developing policies and procedures related to learning English as a second language in institutional settings.

Another interesting feature of this book is its examination of the myths related to both first language acquisition as well as second language acquisition. As Johnson points out “No one teaches a first language… Language acquisition happens and is not taught by parents” (p. 38). The debunking of these myths is extremely important to understanding the process of language acquisition for ESL/EFL instructors. It is also critical to simply understand what these myths are. Many times these myths have been heard so often they appear as facts, difficult to question. Teachers especially need to understand what they themselves and many parents and fellow instructors may or may not believe when it comes to language acquisition. For these and other reasons, this book is a valuable and research-based starting point for discussions concerning language teaching and learning.

In sum, Johnson collects a variety of about English and English language teaching and learning to create a quick and easy-to-read resource for ESL educations and administrators. I only regret that Myths does not consider how the myths about other languages might be debunked–or how similar myths function in non-U.S. educational settings. That is to say, the activities, resources, and implications all assume the reader is an ESL/EFL instructor. However, including examples of non-English speaking contexts might give this book an even wider appeal.

Mandy Reinig
Penn State Altoona, Pennsylvania USA
arr14psu.edu

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.