• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

The Developing Language Learner: An Introduction to Exploratory Practice

December 2010 – Volume 14, Number 3

The Developing Language Learner: An Introduction to Exploratory Practice

Author: Dick Allwright and Judith Hanks
Publisher: London: Palgrave Macmillan (2009)
Pages ISBN Price
312 pages $35.00 USD 978-1403985323

Although there are many prevailing theories on meeting the needs of language learners, there is often little consensus that a practitioner can turn to in the heat of the moment. The balancing of outside pressures, institutional pressures, and the forces of institutionalization often seem at odds with teachers’ instincts and the bond that they have forged with their learners. Allwright and Hanks address many of these concerns and present an alternative to a teacher-centered classroom in The Developing Language Learner.

The book begins by setting forth five propositions about language learners. As expressed in their introductory chapter, the authors note that learners are 1) unique individuals, 2) who learn most effectively in social situations, 3) are capable of taking their learning seriously, 4) are able to make independent decisions regarding their learning, and 5) can develop as practitioners of learning. These five propositions are the rubric by which the authors review the field of applied linguistics and measure their new approach to learner development.

Part I, “The Developing View of the Learner,” contains seven chapters that evaluate assessment, teacher training, methodology, learner variables and Second Language Acquisition in terms of their ability to meet the authors’ five propositions regarding language learners. Allwright and Hanks examine each in turn and find that not one of them currently meets the five propositions entirely. From this review, they conclude that a new approach to teaching and learning is needed.

Part II, “Research Models, What We Have and What We Need,” contains three chapters and turns from linguistics to research in the classroom. As with the first part of the book, Allwright and Hanks put forth two aims for language learner research as 1) developing understanding of learners’ roles in the classroom, and 2) develop understandings in order to assist learners in their development as practitioners. The authors proceed to explore the ability of third party and action research to meet those goals. As in Part I, they find current models wanting in their ability to aid educators’ understandings of language learner. The book also raises valuable epistemological and ethical questions regarding the conduct of third party research. As Allwright and Hanks demonstrate through past examples and research, divorcing researchers from practitioners and practitioners from learners creates an attitude of counterproductive mistrust and incomplete findings. Based on their findings, the authors proceed to enumerate several principles of language learner research, based on cooperation, inclusiveness, and seeking to understand and develop quality of life.

Having explored the existing views of learners and existing research models, the book proposes an alternative that synthesizes the five propositions, the two aims of research, and the seven principles established in the end of Part II—they call this alternative Exploratory Practice. Part III, “Inclusive Practitioner Research in Practice,” includes # chapters that explore several case studies of Exploratory Practice (EP) in action. The fourth and final part lists materials and resources that prospective teachers and learners might draw upon.

There is much to recommend the book to prospective readers. Allwright and Hanks’s writing is clear, precise, and accessible to the general reader. They draw heavily upon past case studies, thinkers in the field and the anecdotal evidence of teachers and learners to build their case. Their analysis in the first two sections is balanced and fair and they are more than willing to acknowledge the strengths of one approach to learners even as they expose its failings vis-à-vis their premises. The points that are raised regarding the marginalization of the learners in preexisting teaching and research models are well-argued and logically followed to their conclusion of supporting the call for new approaches to teachings and research.

After finishing the first two-thirds of the book, the outlook does appear to be bleak. Part III feels rather like a breath of fresh air following the rather gloomy first two sections. Exploratory Practice (EP) as presented in The Developing Language Learner, holds much promise. Developing inclusive practitioner research will provide opportunities for learners to take responsibility for their own learning. Seeking to turn issues into puzzles to be understood first rather than assuming that they are problems to be fixed will also allow for more objective analysis on the part of the reviewers. If educators wish to understand learner motivations and roles in the classroom, it would follow that actively engaging them as more than human guinea pigs would be effective.

Educators looking for practical ways to make use of Exploratory Practice will not be disappointed. Part three cites specific steps that practitioners have taken to introduce and develop EP in their classrooms. The outline of these procedures also includes analysis and reflection on their effectiveness by the authors and the participating members. Part four further lists materials and resources that teachers may draw upon to incorporate the approach into their teaching.

As with any book dealing with such a complex topic, it is not without its weaknesses. Readers may question why more details were not drawn from case studies outside of Brazil. Only three of the nineteen case studies in the third section come from different contexts. A deeper examination of implementation outside of a single context might help educators deal with different cultural expectations of teacher and learner relationships. Additionally, less experienced educators might find the implementation of EP in their classroom to be daunting. Although confident in its adoption by teachers who have been exposed to it in their training, Allwright and Hanks themselves concede that such a concern is “a crucial issue for [them]” (p. 255) in their final evaluation of EP.

All and all, The Developing Language Learner offers much food for thought for educators. It is a clear and thorough exploration of Allwright and Hanks’ perspectives on learning, learners, and research. They deftly weave multiple voices, perspectives and case studies to make a strong case that deficiencies exist in current paradigms and to put forth Exploratory Practice taken up by classroom practitioners as a possible solution to those deficiencies.

Reviewed by

Geoffrey Butler
ELS Language Centers
<geoffrey.h.butleratmarkgmail.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.