• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Understanding Advanced Second-Language Reading

December 2011 – Volume 15, Number 3

Understanding Advanced Second-Language Reading

Author: Elizabeth B. Bernhardt (2010)  
Publisher: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Pages ISBN Price
218 pages 9780415879101 $44.95 USD

The purpose of this book is to account for how second language readers comprehend upper-register texts such as commentaries and essays, which require profound syntactic and semantic knowledge, advanced cognitive and metacognitive skills, and even subtle pragmatic differences for fluent processing. This volume emphasizes the importance of synchronous functions of first language (L1) proficiency and second language (L2) competence for L2 reading comprehension. In this process, known as the compensatory processing, knowledge sources, including L1 literacy and L2 language knowledge, work together to compensate for any deficiencies in L2 reading. In addition, pointing out that current instructions tend to disregard the contribution of L1 literacy to L2 reading comprehension, Bernhardt suggests how L2 reading development can be best facilitated considering the interplay between L1 and L2 proficiencies.

Chapter 1 describes how the perspectives on second language reading have changed since the 19th century. As previous research on second language reading was limited to a subfield of foreign language education and mainly based on first-language research, the field did not provide insightful perspectives on the process of second language reading. Thus, the currently modified views are established on new social, cognitive, and sociocognitive dimensions and include processing perspectives.

Chapter 2 introduces preponderant thoughts on second language reading in the 1970s and 1980s. Most of the studies, affected by schema theory and psycholinguistics, focused on bottom-up and top-down processing to explain how readers process L2 texts, which does not allow an interactional approach due to the hierarchical feature. Bernhardt insists that this approach is inappropriate to account for advanced second language reading because it cannot capture the on-going interaction in the reading process. Accordingly, a new methodology is necessary: a compensatory model of L2 reading, which claims that readers tend to employ all the resources in L1 and L2 to compensate for any deficiencies in L2 reading.

Chapter 3 reviews L2 reading research based on the compensatory theory and analyzes them critically according to several divisions: background knowledge, technology, strategies, testing, intrapersonal variables, transfer, phonological processing/word recognition, instruction, vocabulary, morphosyntax, and genre/text features. Particularly, this chapter highlights the importance of automatic decoding skills for fluent word reading, such as phonological awareness and word recognition, and the transfer from the L1 to the L2 in terms of strategies, morphosyntax, and vocabulary.

Chapter 4 illustrates the three main contributors to second language reading; language knowledge, first-language literacy, and other factors, and examines how these three components are interwoven and actively assist each other to offset deficit. Furthermore, the author evaluates how researchers account for second language reading considering the interrelated factors and suggests that teachers need to encourage L2 readers to employ L1 literacy to gain a high-level understanding in L2 reading texts.

Chapter 5 elucidates why it is important to use upper-register texts to observe the dynamics within a reader in the process of L2 reading. Advanced-level texts require readers to access cultural knowledge, high-cognitive skills, as well as linguistic competence in order to construct the meaning from the texts. In addition, the writer maintains that the compensatory theory would help us understand L2 literary reading comprehension since readers engage all the existing resources including L1 and L2 in order to build their understanding.

Chapter 6 introduces how to measure readers’ reading comprehension through a scoring and a rating matrix. While scoring, which makes it easy to diagnose readers’ syntactic and lexical problems, seems to be a useful tool for novice teachers, rating can be a more appropriate technique for experienced practitioners who are quick to assess readers’ grammatical and discourse knowledge. Also, the author explores how to teach reading effectively, specifically about highly sophisticated texts.

Chapter 7 focuses on the issues related to second language reading discussed in the current research and guides the future research within the frame of the compensatory theory. Then, the author raises new questions from previously mentioned topics, such as background knowledge, technology, strategies, testing, etc., and poses further questions on upper-register text processing and the compensatory processing of L2 reading.

On the whole, this volume offers a substantial research base and emphasizes how the compensatory theory can be adequately applied to clarify advanced second language reading procedure. It also points out the research tendency of disregarding the importance of L1 literacy in the second language reading process and continuously refers to the impact of the first language in reading comprehension. Based on extensive empirical and theoretical studies, this book successfully guides readers to understand the issues related to second language reading that have been discussed and about which directions should be studied further. In particular, this volume demonstrates its value in consistent attempts to synthesize previous studies and to draw a conclusive theory. Also, the end of the book provides a useful appendix that includes summaries of the sheer number of studies cited in this volume, in which readers can enjoy the gist of each study and appreciate it. In addition to a rich coverage of the reading research, this volume provides valuable pedagogical implications for practitioners who engage in second language reading. Although this book nicely guides readers by offering a brief summary in the beginning of each chapter, novice readers may get confused with a list of studies on controversial issues. Also, some contents of this volume seems to overlap the former book, Reading Development in a Second Language (Bernhardt, 1991), though this follow-up definitely extends the research fields of advanced second language reading. Edmund B. Huey (1908) stated that research was a way of bringing about a positive impact on the world; similarly, this book makes a significant contribution to the field of second language reading by paving the way for future research.

References

Bernhardt, E.B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, research, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Huey, E.B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.

Reviewed by

JuHee Lee
The University of Texas at Austin
<juhee901atmarkutexas.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.