• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Capitalizing on Language Learners’ Individuality: From Premise to Practice

November 2014 – Volume 18, Number 3

Capitalizing on Language Learners’ Individuality:
From Premise to Practice

Author: Tammy Gregersen & Peter D. MacIntyre (2014)  
Publisher: Bristol: Multilingual Matters
Pages ISBN Price
268 pages 978-1-78309-119-5 $40.34 USD

Capitalizing on learners’ individuality is like looking at the language learning experience through a kaleidoscope (p. xiii). It involves seeing the separate colours and patterns of individual experience, orchestrating them into a coherent picture of group experience, and maintaining this coherence through all the dynamic changes that language learning entails. Effective language teaching today is associated with providing the optimal learning experience for both the individual and the learner group at the same time—a real challenge for the language educator who wishes to satisfy these needs, but is not equipped with the necessary materials and competences yet. For all readers inclined to live up to similar modern-day demands, Capitalizing on Language Learners’ Individuality: From Premise to Practice by Gregersen and MacIntyre will seem like a survival kit designed to offer both answers and explanations from the expanding field of individual differences (ID) research, as well as a practical inventory for making language learning a cognitively engaging and emotionally comfortable experience.

Like any survival kit, the book aims to provide treatment for various difficulties in the most necessary areas. The seven chapters are dedicated to those ID factors that are generally thought to have the strongest impact on the quality of the language learning experience: anxiety, beliefs, cognitive abilities (including aptitude, working memory, and multiple intelligences), motivation, learning strategies, learning styles, and willingness to communicate. Each chapter is made up of two important sections: one of premises, which introduces the reader to the theoretical considerations and research approaches that best characterize the given ID factor, and one of practice, which offers a wide selection of classroom activities targeting the specific components described among the premises. As the authors emphasize, the chapters and most of the activities are applicable in any preferred order, thus giving a free hand to concentrate on one personally relevant aspect at a time.

What is it? Where does it come from? Why is this important?—These are the starting points to each premise section (p. xiv), indicating that the ensuing discussion on the given ID factor will be focused, logical, and practice-oriented. A peculiar feature of the chapters is that each starts with a little story, which demonstrates the importance of nurturing these ID variables in an intriguing and accessible way. Other than that, the premise sections smartly embed definitions, models, sources, and subcomponents into the discussion of their relevant research contexts, and manage to maintain a wide scope of inquiry without getting lost in superfluous details. As ID variables typically interact with one another in dynamic ways (p. xiii), cross-chapter references are also employed to avoid repetition as much as possible. Once the problematic questions and areas are exposed, each premise section concludes with an action plan on how to assess and capitalize on learners’ individual set-up of the given variable, thus setting realistic goals and establishing direct connections between the premises and the upcoming activities.

The practice sections pursue a three-part objective: to improve learners’ language skill, emotional-psychological state, as well as classroom atmosphere (p. xvii), and the activities transmit an amazing potential for achieving these aims. Each activity includes an introductory quote for sparking interest and discussion, the targeted proficiency level, and the step-by-step description of implementing the given activity, with special attention to prefacing at the beginning and de-briefing at the end. In addition to these elements, several activities include guidelines and materials for before-class preparation, and possible modifications for emergent learners, large classes, and different types of technology, such as mobile phones, Web applications, or online platforms. Task descriptions are clear, explanatory, precisely referenced and often supplemented with ideas for alternative learner-centred assessment (pp. xix-xxi), while basic language skills are integrated into the tasks in creative and subtle ways. Adding to this the diversity and the number of activities offered in each chapter (fifteen on average), it seems impossible not to find any that would suit the needs of learners and teachers in any educational context.

To get a snapshot about how the book embodies all the above described features, let us take the chapter on beliefs as an example. As a starting point to understanding the individual tones of the concept, the premise section begins with the story of the wealthy father taking his son on a trip to the country and realizing that the son’s beliefs about poverty are fundamentally different from his own. After two pages on theoretical underpinnings, the chapter moves on to devising an action plan for harmonizing and capitalizing on specific teacher and learner beliefs about, for instance, the nature and difficulty of language learning, or the role of feedback. Corresponding to these categories, the sixteen activities of the practice section offer diverse methods for sharing, assessing, and revising beliefs. Within this rich selection, the reader can find guidelines for debate tasks, role plays, poster or story sessions, group activities exploiting classroom space, or activities as simple as writing down one-minute answers to open-ended statements.

However comforting it might feel, though, to have a survival kit from which seemingly nothing is missing, thinking about life in the jungle can easily shadow our determination with some questions and worries. Does the average curriculum allow any place for these kinds of activities or do we need specialized training sessions? How much time do these activities require exactly and how many sessions should be devoted to a specific ID factor? What if a given activity is not compatible with the age or proficiency of our learner group, even though the book recommends it for all levels? Were all of these activities empirically tested? Naturally, as the efficiency of the survival kit depends on how its user applies it, the use of a guidebook also involves tailoring its content to the specific learning context so that its benefits can gradually unfold.

If I had to describe this book with a single term only, without hesitation I would write it is ‘reader-friendly’. I would choose this adjective because of the clever selection of texts, research studies, and activities; the straightforward chapters, headings, visual and teaching materials; the clear, readable, coherent paragraphs; and the colourful picture of the kaleidoscope on the front cover. It would take one more minute to remember the eagerness and readiness with which the book gets down to catering language skills, affective individual dispositions, and group dynamics at the same time. I would probably erase my previous answer, and write down ‘resourceful’ instead. And only then would it strike me what it means to have a resourceful book for learner-centred teaching. It not only aims at empowering language educators to see the individual colours of their learners’ identities, but also empowering learners to see their own and each other’s competences and identities through the kaleidoscope and to cherish this vision. I would grab my eraser one last time, and proudly write: ‘must-have.’

Reviewed by
Kornél Farkas
University of Pécs, Hungary
<fkornelsatmarkgmail.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.