• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

The Electronic Oxford Wordpower Dictionary

March 1996 — Volume 2, Number 1

The Electronic Oxford Wordpower Dictionary

Oxford University Press
Walton Street, Oxford OX2 6PD

System requirements (PC):
386 or above IBM or compatible computer
Windows 3.1 or higher
VGA monitor or better
DOS 3.3 or higher
about 10 MB free disk space
3.5 floppy drive
2 MB free RAM

Format:
The Electronic Oxford Wordpower Dictionary comes on 5 HD floppy
disks, with a reasonably simple and well-written manual. It took
about 10 minutes to install.

Overview

The Electronic Oxford Wordpower Dictionary is a well-designed electronic reference tool designed specifically for learners of English as a second or foreign language. It is not a substitute for a full-functioned electronic dictionary such as the American Heritage Electronic Dictionary, but rather a tool for teaching English to Intermediate-level students.

What The Program Does

This is basically an interactive vocabulary-building program. Its core vocabulary consists of 3.500 important words. Each of these words is defined, explained and examples are given; derivatives, compounds and idiomatic expressions are included. In addition, there are lists of phrasal verbs, common idioms, and 650 illustrations.

Calling it a dictionary is almost a misnomer. Although it shares certain features with a conventional dictionary (definitions, phonetic information, grammatical information) is offers both more and less. The additional features are the variety of ways to search for information inherent in an electronic database, the advantages of hypertext, allowing you to jump instantly from one definition or explanation to that of any other word mentioned therein, and the additional activities included, which I will enumerated shortly. The main lack is the extremely limited vocabulary of core words which preclude its use as a primary dictionary except at the lowest levels. It does come with a built-in link to Microsoft Word,[-1-] allowing users of that word processor to access the Electronic Oxford Wordpower Dictionary directly from their Word documents, but this does not work with other word processors.

The original printed Oxford Dictionary for learners of English as a foreign or second language is a learners dictionary designed by ESL and EFL teachers to address the general and specific needs of their students. It is one step up from the Picture Dictionaries so popular and useful with children and very low level students. The electronic version is a vast improvement.

The interface is un-cluttered and windows-standard, relatively intuitive and easy to navigate. Each word in the core vocabulary is listed as a HEADWORD along with phonetic information, grammatical information, various definitions, sample sentences, idioms containing the word, derivatives, compounds, phrasal verbs, usage notes, and in some cases illustrations.

In addition to the regular listings there are separate lists of irregular verbs and a good help chart on phonetic transcription. There is also an ingenious Conversions Module which allows users to transcribe numbers into words, as well as convert units of weight, length, area, cubic measurement, and temperature from metric to non-metric and visa-versa.

Perhaps the most innovative feature of the program is the Games Module. This is also what sets it apart from a conventional electronic dictionary. The games all involve lexical activity; vocabulary building, relating words, or pattern recognition, and consulting the dictionary during the games is encouraged. The individual games (Word Square, Word Pyramid, Word Definitions and Word Snake), can be combined into a more involved activity called the Egyptian Adventure, in which students hunt for hidden linguistic treasure. The program even prints an attractive certificate for high scores.

Some Shortcomings

The main shortcomings, aside from the limited word list, consist in a failure to take advantage of the full potential of the program. For example, with a little imagination and some technical skill, a teacher can use the Electronic Oxford Wordpower Dictionary to create interesting in-class activities and exercises. The instruction manual even includes a few examples of exercises the authors have thought up. However, inexperienced teachers will have trouble creating their own exercises in the absence of detailed instructions or a built-in exercise generator.

Also a program of this nature would benefit greatly from a aural component. I dont know the technical exigencies, but a simple [-2-] sound capability to demonstrate pronunciation would make the package more attractive.

The Bottom Line

If you are looking for a full, high-school or collegiate level dictionary of the English Language, this program is not for you. But if you are looking for an attractive, interactive way to build vocabulary in low and intermediate students, the Electronic Oxford Wordpower Dictionary may very well be what you are looking for.

Michael F. Feldman
English Chair
Universidad Espiritu Santo
Guayaquil, Ecuador
mfeldman@uees.edu.ec

[-4-]

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page in the paginated ASCII version of this article, which is the definitive edition. Please use these page numbers when citing this work.

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.