• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

MReader

February 2018 – Volume 22, Number 4

Website https://mreader.org
Title MReader
Creator Thomas Robb
Hosted by the Extensive Reading Foundation
Contact Information adminatmarkmreader.org
Type of Product Extensive reading quiz website
Hardware Requirements An internet-accessible device (computer, tablet, smartphone)
Software requirements Any internet browser (e.g., Google Chrome, Safari, Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer)
Supplementary Software Moodle “Reader” plug-in (if used within Moodle)
Price Free for educational institutions, but donations of ¥50,000 ($500 US) to ¥100,000 ($1,000 US) are suggested

Introduction

Extensive reading is an approach to reading in the second language classroom which encourages language learners to read more for enjoyment and to choose books on a variety of topics with the goal of encouraging a liking for reading (Day & Bamford, 2002). While the focus of extensive reading is on reading for enjoyment and not assessment of the book or linguistic features, it is often necessary for teachers to ensure that students continue to read by assessing their reading (Day & Bamford, 1998). One tool created to support extensive reading assessment is MReader, a freely available website that provides more than 6,500 automatically-graded quizzes for books from a variety of publishers which are commonly used in an extensive reading curriculum. MReader’s two objectives are: (1) to support the integration of extensive reading into existing curriculum; and (2) to track student progress as a way to support students in their extensive reading. Quizzes are typically 7-10 questions long and are randomly selected from a question bank of 20-30 questions per book. MReader supports a range of proficiency levels (beginner, intermediate, and advanced) and includes quizzes for books on a variety of topics of interest to language learners in primary, secondary, and university contexts.

It is important to note that MReader does not provide the extensive reading books; this tool provides only the quizzes that correspond to these books in the format of a learning management system. MReader can be integrated into the Moodle learning management system using the “Reader” plug-in; more information detailing this procedure can be found on the “About MReader” webpage: https://mreader.org/mreaderadmin/s/html/about.html. Teachers interested in using MReader should contact the administrator at adminatmarkmreader.org to create an account.

This review will begin with a description of the student interface and the teacher interface. It will then evaluate MReader’s pedagogical value for supporting extensive reading in the language classroom.

Description: Student view

MReader main page
Figure 1. MReader main page.

From MReader’s main page, both students and teachers can log into the system (see Figure 1 above). After logging in, the student is taken to their individualized homepage which lists the covers of the books read in the course. Below the book covers is a reading report which allows students to monitor their overall reading progress, including information about the book such as the title, level, publisher, number of words, when quiz was taken, and if the quiz was passed or not. Additionally, the reading report tracks the total words read and the student’s current reading level. Figure 2 below shows the student homepage; this student has read five books at the current level (L) and one book at the next level (L+1) as can be seen by the green boxes in the right corner of the screen. The rainbow scale at the bottom shows the current reading level and the goal for the course.

Student MReader homepage
Figure 2. Student MReader homepage.

Within an extensive reading curriculum, students typically choose the books they would like to read; in line with this, students have access to quizzes for all the books in MReader. Quizzes are available by selecting “View Available Quizzes” from the top of the homepage. After clicking this, a search box will appear where the students can then search for the quiz using the book title, keyword(s), or categories such as genre, publisher, and/or a reading level. Books matching the criteria, along with the reading level and the number of words, are then displayed so students can be sure if the book matches their reading level. A green frame around the book means that a quiz is available for the student to take; alternatively, a red frame means that the quiz is not available because the student has already taken the quiz. Clicking on the book cover will begin the quiz. Figure 3 below shows this user interface.

Searching for available quizzes
Figure 3. Searching for available quizzes.

Quizzes are timed and typically last 15 minutes. The quiz questions are designed to assess general comprehension of the book and ask about the plot, characters, and order of events in the book. To do this, MReader uses three types of questions: multiple choice (Figure 4), true/false (Figure 5), and drag & drop into correct order (Figure 6).

An example of a multiple-choice question
Figure 4. An example of a multiple-choice question.

An example of a true/false question
Figure 5. An example of a true/false question.

An example of a drag & drop correct order question
Figure 6. An example of a drag & drop correct order question.

After each quiz, and before the results are given, students complete a short survey which asks questions about the book’s difficulty, the time it took to read the book, if a dictionary was used, and the student’s overall enjoyment of the book. It is important to note that the survey must be completed and submitted for students receive the quiz results. After submitting the survey, students are told whether or not they passed or failed the quiz; results are reported as “pass” or “fail”. Each school can determine how many questions should be answered correctly in order to pass the quiz, and thus the threshold for passing is flexible for the contextual needs. Students are allowed only one attempt per quiz unless their teacher authorizes an additional attempt. If a student passes the quiz, the book cover appears on their homepage and their reading progress is updated.

Description: Teacher view

From MReader’s teacher homepage, teachers have access to student information and reading progress, including names and usernames, reading level, quiz progress, total words read, and reading goals. MReader also helps teachers to visually monitor students’ progress. For example, in Figure 7 below, the dark red in the first column “Username” signals that the student has not been active recently (meaning that no quizzes have been taken). Additionally, under the column “Total words this term”, the green indicates that a student has passed the course goal while white means that the student has not yet read 50% of the course goal.

Teacher homepage
Figure 7. Teacher homepage.

Even though quizzes cannot be adapted, MReader does allow teachers to change the number of points needed to pass a quiz (T. Robb, personal communication, Oct. 21, 2018). Teachers are also provided with several control options such as adjusting a student’s reading level and password, managing how frequently a student can take a quiz, checking for cheating, assigning extra credit, and giving credit for a book which does not have a corresponding quiz in MReader (see Figure 8 below). In the “Check for cheating” feature, teachers can see if multiple students are simultaneously taking a quiz or if they have taken a number of quizzes in common. It is left to the teacher’s discretion to determine whether or not students are cheating based on the metrics provided. Overall, these options vary depending on the settings provided, so individual teachers would need to work with the MReader administrator in order to decide what is best for the students in the course.

Teacher controls in MReader
Figure 8. Teacher controls in MReader.

Evaluation

In evaluating computer-assisted language learning (CALL) tools, it is necessary to consider the tool’s pedagogical effectiveness in the context of the instruction (Burston, 2003). With this in mind, this evaluation of MReader will do so considering the purpose and goal of extensive reading.

As outlined in the introduction, the goal of extensive reading is to “develop good reading habits, to build up knowledge of vocabulary and structure, and to encourage a liking for reading” (Richards and Schmidt , 2002, p. 193-194). Assessing extensive reading is not encouraged in order to avoid a negative association between reading and testing (Stoeckel, Reagan, & Hann, 2012), however teachers might still need to motivate students to complete reading assignments by holding them accountable and assessing their general comprehension of the book. Overall, MReader appears to balance this perspective to extensive reading with the reality of the language classroom. The short quizzes assess the main aspects of the book rather than specific details or linguistic features using question types that assess general understanding. Additionally, MReader includes quizzes for books on a range of genres, topics, and reading levels; because an important component of extensive reading is that students do so for enjoyment, it is useful that students have access to this variety of genres and topics. In addition to the quiz questions, the reading progress visualization on the student’s homepage might help students feel motivated and encourage them to continue reading.

MReader’s primary value is the increased efficiency for language teachers as the extensive reading evaluation process is simplified and automated. The freely available 6,500+ quizzes provide an incentive for language teachers to incorporate extensive reading into their classrooms because the burden of creating and grading reading comprehension quizzes is eliminated. Additionally, because it is web-based and easily accessible online, MReader is flexible in that it can support extensive reading both in and out of the classroom, either as ‘replacement ER’, if used in the classroom, or ‘additive ER’, encouraging students to spend more time reading at home on their own (Robb & Kano, 2013). This flexibility allows teachers to carefully consider the best pedagogical approach for their educational contexts. Also, the ability to integrate MReader with the Moodle learning management system reduces the need for the teacher to independently coordinate two different learning management systems.

While MReader does support the incorporation of extensive reading into the language classroom, teachers should be realistic about its language learning potential. The tool does not provide linguistic input, corrective feedback, or an opportunity for interaction; however, these are not typically core components of extensive reading and MReader makes no claims to do this. MReader is somewhat limited as it requires schools to physically have copies of the extensive reading books. This might not be a reality for many educational institutions and could limit MReader’s usability in some global educational contexts. Therefore, teachers interested in using MReader should remember the very specific use of this CALL tool.

Conclusion

MReader is a practical and affordable solution for integrating the assessment of extensive reading in the language classroom. With over 6,500 quizzes for a diverse set of books, this tool can appeal to students in a variety of educational contexts. While this benefit appears to be more for language teachers than language learners, MReader offers teachers in both English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts a reasonable way to assess and manage students’ extensive reading.

References

Burston, J. (2003). Software selection: A primer on sources and evaluation. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 29-40.

Day, R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Day, R., & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 136-141.

Richards, J.C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics, (3rd ed.). London, England: Pearson Education.

Robb, T., & Kano, M. (2013). Effective extensive reading outside the classroom: A large-scale experiment. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 234-247.

Stoeckel, T., Reagan, N., & Hann, F. (2012). Extensive reading quizzes and reading attitudes. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 187-198.

About the reviewer

Erin Todey is a PhD student in the Applied Linguistics & Technology Program at Iowa State University. Her research interests include English for Specific Purposes, genre analysis, corpus linguistics, and computer-assisted language learning.

<eftodeyatmarkiastate.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.