• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation

November 2020 – Volume 24, Number 3

Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation

Author: John M. Levis (2018) book cover
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. xiii + 198 9781108241564 $34.99 U.S.

Pronunciation is an important part of the language classroom that has long been neglected, but recently started to receive the attention it deserves (Derwing, 2019). Research has shown that intelligibility, the extent to which a listener can understand a speaker’s speech (Munro & Derwing, 1995), is crucial for successful communication (Levis, 2018) and should be the goal in second language (L2) classrooms. John Levis’ (2018) Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation offers connections between research and teaching practices by providing inspiration, guidance, and innovative approaches to L2 pronunciation instruction.

This book presents a framework for teaching spoken language and highlights priorities in pronunciation teaching. It also covers major findings of relevant research in the field, and what should and should not be taught in an intelligibility-based classroom. It addresses the practical side of teaching and the elements necessary for successful communication when learning a second language; it is therefore of primary interest to professionals interested in teaching pronunciation, but is also a useful resource for pronunciation researchers. There are four major parts to this book: Part I: A Framework for the Teaching of Spoken Language; Part II: Word-based Errors and Intelligibility; Part III: Discourse-based Errors and Intelligibility; and Part IV: Teaching and Research Approaches to Intelligibility. These parts are further divided into 10 chapters.

Part I contains two chapters that frame the need for centering pronunciation teaching around the intelligibility principle, which states that the ultimate goal in pronunciation teaching should be that the speaker is understandable, rather than achieve a native-like accent. Chapter 1 defines key terms used throughout the book (e.g., intelligibility and comprehensibility), comparing them to Smith and Nelson’s (1985) and Munro and Derwing’s (1995) foundational definitions. Chapter 2 provides a review of priorities in pronunciation teaching, offering an overview and critique of existing recommendations in the pronunciation teaching field. For example, Levis summarizes studies and findings from various authors, which could serve as a starting point for future researchers (p. 50).

Moving on to Part II, Chapter 3 discusses vowel and consonant research, examining naturalistic and instructed development, as well as the functional load principle. Levis’ rank ordering of phoneme pairs (sounds) commonly mistaken by learners (p. 84) is based on the functional load principle (Munro & Derwing, 2006) and is convenient for language teachers by allowing them to set teaching priorities. Chapter 4 is concerned with consonant clusters (i.e., adjacent consonants within a syllable) and their connection to grammatical morphemes, such as past tense inflections (e.g., -ed). Levis suggests that this is an underrepresented area of research and raises questions for future exploration (p. 99). The role of word stress and the way it is perceived by native and nonnative speakers, as well as its importance for intelligibility and teaching, is explained in Chapter 5. Levis treats the effect of word stress on intelligibility similarly to segmentals, because stressing a word incorrectly “can change how vowels and consonants are pronounced” (p. 25).

Part III delves into discourse-based errors and their effect on intelligibility. Chapter 6 details the complex concept of rhythm (including speech rate, fluency, and connected speech) and its connection to intelligibility. Levis proposes that some features associated with rhythm, such as connected speech, may not affect spoken intelligibility but are essential for speaker perception. Intonation and the roles of prominence and tune are discussed in Chapter 7, including prominence’s place in the Lingua Franca Core—a revised pronunciation syllabus for English as an International Language (Jenkins, 2002)—and tune’s relevance for pragmatics and social interaction. Levis defines tune as “the pitch movement from the nuclear syllable to the end of the phrase” (p. 171).

While Parts I-III define, present, and analyze key concepts, the three chapters in Part IV directly address teaching and build an argument for the intelligibility-centered classroom. The aim of Chapter 8 is to provide guidelines for setting priorities in pronunciation teaching. Levis outlines six guidelines for creating intelligibility-based classrooms which can be adapted to various contexts. Furthermore, in Chapter 9, the intelligibility-centered classroom’s changing role in language teaching is discussed, providing a rationale for adopting the approach and explaining a realistic proposal for instruction. Finally, Chapter 10 is the most practice-oriented chapter, indicating the “more important” (e.g., initial consonant clusters) and “less important” (e.g., medial consonants cluster) features to be included in pronunciation teaching.

Overall, the major strength of Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation lies in its framing and presentation of the rationale for the intelligibility-based classroom. In doing so, it provides clear guidelines for adopting the intelligibility approach. Levis establishes a straightforward connection between research and practice, directly translating literature into practical approaches for teachers and instructors. Furthermore, the book is easy to follow due to the author’s use of language that facilitates understanding of concepts. The display and summary of main points throughout the chapters also allow navigating and locating the needed information easily.

What this book seems to be missing, however, is a discussion of pronunciation assessment, although Levis does address this and directs readers to other resources that cover this subtopic. Even though it is not the book’s goal to provide hands-on activities, given the focus on teaching, it might have been helpful to include a list of resources containing specific activities that can be used in the classroom. This would have made the book more practical for teachers. Another drawback of the book is the fact that it mainly addresses research for English language learners. It would be beneficial to read how these issues are addressed with learners of other languages. Finally, individual learner differences (e.g., personality, motivation, attitude, beliefs, etc.) and their connection to intelligibility-based pronunciation teaching should have been addressed.

All in all, Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation is a helpful and practical resource for English teachers worldwide. It is also a must-read for novice researchers interested in oral communication and pronunciation, as it covers the pronunciation literature and can serve as a step to generate future research ideas. Professionals and instructors interested in teaching applied phonology and intelligibility-related graduate-level courses will also find this to be an engaging textbook.

References

Derwing, T. M. (2019). Utopian goals for pronunciation research revisited. In J. Levis, C. Nagle, & E. Todey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 27-35). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83-103.

Levis, J. M. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.

Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520-531.

Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73-97.

Smith, L. E., & Nelson, C. L. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4(3), 333-342.

Reviewed by
Agata Guskaroska
Iowa State University
<agatagatmarkiastate.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.