• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Scaffolding for Multilingual Learners in Elementary and Secondary Schools

February 2024 – Volume 27, Number 4

https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27108r2

Scaffolding for Multilingual Learners in Elementary and Secondary Schools

Authors: de Oliveira, L.C., & Westerlund, R. (Eds.). (2022) book cover
Publisher: Routledge
Pages ISBN-13 Price
Pp. 238 978-1-03-202047-1 (paper) $42.36

Within the K-12 school setting, multilingual learners (MLs) face many challenges related to understanding and learning critical content knowledge. Because K-12 content requires highly advanced and technical vocabulary, academic discourse, and strong writing skills, the material can be complex for MLs to grasp and master fully. Unfortunately, teachers sometimes underestimate MLs’ abilities in school and purposefully simplify content to help them comprehend classroom material more expediently (Pettit, 2011). These simplifications may impact their ability to learn higher-order thinking skills or their overall academic progress. To address the need to make content both accessible and challenging, teachers may consider using appropriate scaffolding techniques, such as incorporating students’ home languages and visual supports that value MLs’ contributions to their classes and enable them to grow academically.

Luciana de Oliveira and Ruslana Westerland lay out an important foundation for using scaffolding in K-12 contexts in their recent volume, Scaffolding for Multilingual Learners in Elementary and Secondary Schools. This edited volume is an articulate and informative compilation of chapters written by various scholars of multilingual education seeking to address the misconceptions and misunderstandings of what scaffolding looks like practically in the classroom. The volume also offers theoretically grounded and practical applications of scaffolding in effective instruction. This timely book provides teachers and teacher educators with the tools that they need to deliver efficient scaffolding for MLs. As the book’s title suggests, the content is designed for both elementary and secondary students, primarily in US-based schools with possible applications to global settings in K-12 content area classrooms.

This volume is organized according to three critical topics for educators working with MLs: understanding the theoretical underpinnings of scaffolding, applying scaffolding in diverse classroom contexts, and enhancing teachers’ scaffolding techniques. Section 1 (Chapters 1-5) lays a theoretical foundation with sociocultural theory and explores the history of scaffolding and its application for MLs. This section discusses equitable participation in various subject areas and dual language bilingual education. For example, in Chapter 4, Wilfrid and Molle describe the importance of equitable instruction for MLs in content area classrooms while drawing upon sociocultural theory, which explains how content instruction can support students’ participation and agency in the classroom.

Section 2 (Chapters 6-10) offers practical insights through case studies and examples from actual classroom scenarios, demonstrating diverse scaffolding practices. For instance, in Chapter 6, Barko-Alva, Masyada, and Norez discuss the implementation of a dual language bilingual education (DLBE) program in a secondary social studies classroom. The scaffolding techniques that were used helped to improve students’ biliteracy, bilingualism, and intercultural communication. The authors in this chapter also include scaffolding strategies that promote civic engagement, social justice, and disciplinary literacy. In another example in Chapter 7, Walqui discusses incorporating scaffolding in virtual learning environments while including both synchronous and asynchronous support to MLs using visuals and multimedia. In addition, Walqui describes various curriculum models that can be used to teach in the virtual learning space. Another case study presented in Chapter 9 describes how a bilingual kindergarten teacher scaffolded students’ learning by using visual support and students’ home language, Spanish, to promote meaning-making. In addition, the teacher made use of written and oral language, gestures, drawings, and other visuals to support students’ literacy development.

The final section (Chapters 11-13) shifts focus toward professional development, providing guidance for both pre-service and in-service teachers in developing and enhancing their instructional strategies for MLs. This structured approach provides a comprehensive understanding of scaffolding, from theory to practice. For example, in Chapter 12, Chu and Hamburger examine the development of effective curriculum materials for scaffolding mathematics instruction for MLs. This chapter also focuses on teacher development as instructors cater to the linguistic needs of MLs and assess students’ learning as they determine how to offer appropriate visual and linguistic support. In another example, in Chapter 13, Bunch and Lang describe a year-long combined MA and credential program to prepare pre-service teachers to serve MLs. The authors debunk misconceptions about scaffolding often held by these pre-service teachers and invite these students to consider what scaffolding means practically and theoretically. Through this program, the teachers gained a more nuanced understanding of design principles of scaffolding informed by sociocultural theory. Additionally, pre-service teachers in this program had the opportunity to practice scaffolding as learners and to reflect on this process.

The book has a number of notable strengths that may help teachers improve their pedagogical practices. For one, the various authors give in-depth background information and resources on scaffolding. Scaffolding is described not as a linear process but as a dynamic one that responds to individual student needs, challenging the idea that all students must progress at the same pace and that scaffolding is a one-way transmission of knowledge. The book also offers a variety of approaches grounded in the concept that scaffolding must extend beyond basic assistance, tailored to the specific language needs of students. For example, Chapter 6 describes how educators can help students explore their linguistic repertoires and strengthen their critical thinking and analytical skills in a DLBE social studies program. Likewise, Chapter 10 illustrates how exemplary teachers can use interactional scaffolding, or in-the-moment adjustments in teaching, to sustain students’ engagement with challenging English texts, thus facilitating both language development and content comprehension. Furthermore, the book’s focus on professional development and teacher training targets the teaching needs of pre-service and in-service teachers of MLs. For example, Chapter 11 discusses scaffolding teacher learning by emphasizing some of the same principles as with multilingual learners: agency, leadership, and collaboration. This chapter prepares teachers to implement proper scaffolding techniques in their own instruction.

While Scaffolding for Multilingual Learners is an insightful resource, it is limited in the scope of the K-12 subjects covered. Three examples of content areas included are social studies, mathematics, and science. Perhaps in a future companion piece, there could be more coverage of English language arts or humanities classes, as these content areas are often tested on high stakes exams and assessed in the college admissions process. Another recommendation is to balance the K-12 content more equally with attention to both secondary and elementary levels. Chapter 5 provides some segments of interspersion with K-12 content, offering information related to scaffolding that applies to all different grade levels collectively, while considering various science curricula. However, only one elementary-specific lesson is presented about translanguaging in a bilingual kindergarten in Chapter 9. Much of what is emphasized in the book is content related to the secondary and professional levels and teacher candidates.

To conclude, Scaffolding for Multilingual Learners provides educators with a resourceful guide on the intricate process of scaffolding in multilingual settings. While robust in its theoretical foundation, the book offers practical applications, making the content both accessible and actionable. Overall, it will be an essential read for educators who are teaching multilingual learners in content areas in K-12 classrooms, teacher educators, and pre-service teachers.

To Cite this Review

McKee, J. & Zheng, H. (2024). [Review of the book Scaffolding for Multilingual Learners in Elementary and Secondary Schools by de Oliveira, L.C., & Westerlund, R. [eds]]. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 27 (4). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27108r2

Reference

Pettit, S. K. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs About English language learners in the mainstream classroom: A review of the literature. International Multilingual Research Journal, 5(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2011.594357

About the Authors

Jared McKee is a doctoral student in ESOL/Bilingual Education at the University of Florida. His research interests include multiliteracies, scaffolding for reading comprehension, character education for multilingual learners (MLs), and reflective practice. <jared.mckee@ufl.edu> ORCID ID:  0009-0004-5734-6093

Han Zheng is a doctoral student in ESOL/Bilingual Education at the University of Florida. His research interests include the teaching and learning of academic language in content areas, teaching multilingual learners (MLs) at the K-12 levels, teacher education for MLs, scaffolding practices for MLs, along with culturally and linguistically responsive instruction.
<zhenghan@ufl.edu>   ORCID ID: 0009-0002-7999-5620

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.