• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Into English!

November 1997 — Volume 3, Number 1


Josefina Villamil Tinajero and Alfredo Schifini (1997)
Carmel, CA: Hampton-Brown Books
Pp. T42 + 306 (TE Level C); T42 + 310 (TE Level F)
ISBN 1-56334-694-X (TE Level C); 1-56334-738-5 (TE Level F)
Level C: US $70.85 (TE); $675.00 (Classroom set)
Level F: US $70.85 (TE); $544.60 (Classroom set with CD-
ROM); $525.20 (Classroom set without CD-ROM)

The task of creating a basal series for elementary ESL is a challenging one, with multiple, often conflicting, demands. Instruction should be theme-based, literature-based, content-based. We must respect the natural stages of language acquisition, the social nature of children, the authenticity of language. Explicit instruction is needed in the structure of the language, strategies of language learning, critical thinking. Literacy instruction must be holistic, must include phonics, must be integrated. Children at any grade level may be at any level of language proficiency, any level of literacy ability, any level of academic achievement.

The authors and publisher of Into English! have faced these challenges and come up with a series that comes as close to meeting all the demands as any I have seen. The series contains materials for 7 levels, kindergarten through grade 6. All levels include literature books, audiocassettes, posters, an ESL library, and a Teacher’s Guide. There are also picture cards and manipulatives for all grades except K, big books for grades K-2, and CD-ROMs, independent practice books, newcomer books, and patterned books for pre-literate students for grades 3-6. The materials are available in complete classroom sets, or any component can be purchased separately.

Into English! is language-based, literature-based, and content-based. The program is organized around thematic units, which can be taught as is, integrated into native language themes and content, or matched with themes and content being taught in students’ mainstream classes. Each unit begins with five lessons that build the concepts and vocabulary that will be used during the rest of the unit. This is done through extensive use of realia, posters, and audiocassettes containing songs, rhymes and chants. The next five lessons are based on a literature book–authentic, high-quality, multicultural children’s literature–which is made accessible to students of all proficiency levels through a pre-reading story talk-through and multiple re-readings featuring strategies for comprehensible input. The last ten lessons consist of content-based activities that teach grade-level concepts and develop academic language and critical thinking. Throughout the second two sections of each unit, there are mini-lessons that present and [-1-] practice language structure in the context of the literature or content activity. There are also extension and reinforcement activities, opportunities for students to share their cultures, modeling and practice of learning strategies, role play and theater presentations, suggestions for cooperative learning, and writing activities. The lesson plans provide ample opportunities for extensive practice of both spoken and written language, and the suggestions for accommodating students at various proficiency levels make the lessons adaptable for beginner, intermediate, or advanced students, or for heterogeneous classes.

The Teacher’s Guide is the core of the program. It includes, for each unit, a list of resources; lists of objectives, academic concepts, and vocabulary; an activity planner; day-by-day lesson plans; reproducible activity sheets to accompany the daily lessons; and take-home letters in 6 languages. There are also articles on staff development (including, at the upper grade levels, a valuable section on success for newcomers and pre-literate students), activity banks for teaching phonics and writing, lists of professional and cultural resources, and an excellent section on assessment. This section provides assessment guidelines that include suggestions for creating student portfolios and instructions for using the assessment forms that are included in the Teacher’s Guide. These forms consist of a self-assessment form for students to use to reflect on their own learning, a book log which students can fill out to keep track of their reading, and a family interview form that provides valuable background information. The essence of the assessment program, however, is the progress forms, which allow the teacher to easily operationalize performance assessment while teaching the unit. There is one form for each unit, listing performance criteria for assessing fluency, critical thinking, language functions, language structure/patterns, and writing, as well as suggesting one of the unit activities that lends itself to observation of each of these aspects of language.

This facilitation of authentic assessment opportunities is only one of the many strengths of the Into English! program. Another major strength is the integration of content, literature, and language instruction. Too often in the past, content-based activities have been sprinkled through a language-based program with no real attempt to make them an integral part of the program. Or language-based activities are inserted more or less randomly into a literature-based program. In this program, all three types of activities build on each other. The content-based activities and the literature build on and extend each other through the unit theme. The structure mini-lessons are motivated by a structure that is used in the literature or in a content activity. Students will know why they are doing a content-based activity or practicing a language structure, and everything they are learning will make more sense to them because of its inter-relatedness. [-2-]

A third major strength of this program is the quality of the literature used. These are trade books, written by excellent authors and illustrated by talented artists, which are appealing to students and teachers alike. Students will be pleased to be able to read the same books their native English-speaking peers are reading. Teachers will rejoice at the quality of the writing and illustrations. These books are a far cry from the simplified, poorly-illustrated fare we too often serve to our ESL students. In addition to one book that is the focus of the literature-based section of each unit, there is an ESL library that includes two additional related titles for each unit, one appropriate for lower proficiency levels and one for higher levels.

There are many additional points that add to the quality of Into English!:

  1. Lessons begin with what the students know.
  2. The language and concepts needed for the literature and content lessons are developed extensively before those lessons are taught.
  3. The lessons can be taught at various language levels; objectives are coded for which of five levels of language development they apply to, and many lessons include multi-level strategies for presentation, checking understanding, activity options, roles for cooperative groups or for role-playing, writing options, and others
  4. There are many opportunities for home and community involvement, for sharing culture, and for interacting with native speakers–these latter activities are especially nice because the interaction is designed to be reciprocal, rather than the more common one-way interaction where the native speaker “tutors” the non-native speaker.
  5. Language structures are presented in the context of a literature book or a content-based activity, and the mini-lesson format means that a particular structure need be taught only when and if the teacher decides it is needed.
  6. The organization of the program makes it very flexible for use in a variety of contexts, whether a self-contained language development classroom, a pull-out ESL program, the English portion of a bilingual program, or a mainstream classroom with a number of ESL students in it. Suggestions for teaching the program in various contexts, written by teachers who have used it, are included in the Teacher’s Guide. (Although the program was written for teaching ESL in the U.S., I see no reason why it would not be equally as [-3-] effective in EFL situations, as long as the teacher was reasonably fluent in English–it is not the kind of program that provides “scripted” Teacher’s Guides.)

The only major weakness I found with the Into English! program is that it does not include student books. At the lower grades, this is not a problem; the design of the program does not depend on students having their own textbooks, and not having them contributes to the program’s flexibility. Students do like to have their own books, however, especially ESL students who may not be able to participate fully in other subjects. At the upper grades, however, the lack of student textbooks becomes more crucial than simply being a matter of student preference. Beginning in fourth grade, elementary students are more and more often required to read textbooks to gain information. Reading for information requires very different kinds of skills than reading for pleasure, and ESL students using this program will have little practice in developing those skills. I would recommend that teachers using the program make the additional readings (from both the ESL Library and the theme connections resource list) a more integral part of the program, and that students be required to read at least some of these books on their own to gain specific information.

If this is done, the Into English! program can provide all of the activities students need to develop both social and academic language, through themes that will capture and maintain their interest, and with enough guidance so inexperienced teachers can feel confident teaching from the program, but enough flexibility so experienced teachers can easily adapt it to their own teaching styles. While some of the other new elementary ESL programs on the market are excellent, none provides the kind of integration of language, literature and content that this program does, and none provides as much quality support for the teacher. To anybody looking for a way to improve elementary students’ learning of English as a second language, I highly recommend Into English!

Suzanne Irujo
Boston University
<sirujo@bu.edu >

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page in the paginated ASCII version of this article, which is the definitive edition. Please use these page numbers when citing this work. [-4-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.