• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Write To Be Read: Reading, Reflection and Writing

September 1998 — Volume 3, Number 3

Write To Be Read: Reading, Reflection and Writing

William. R. Smalzer (1997)
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pp. viii + 274
ISBN 0-521-44991-X
US $19.95
Write to Be Read is designed to prepare high-intermediate to advanced level ESL/EFL students to write in an academic context. The book is influenced by whole language philosophy [1], and the methodology chosen is “a blend of the process and product approaches to the teaching of writing” (p. v). Reading and writing activities are integrated throughout the book. Students explore topics in detail by reading and sharing their ideas in a written and spoken form with their colleagues. Then they practise writing paragraphs and essays on a number of topics. The advantage of the “process and product approach” is that students can be guided through the stages of writing to develop their skills, while at the same time they can learn how to write the types of assignment they will be asked to do in university courses.

The book is divided into eight chapters, each of which presents a main theme: Birth Order; Head or Heart; Friendship; Human Nature and the Nature of Work; Manners; Courtship; A Better Quality of Life; Our Planet. Each chapter is organised into five main sections: a) a pre-reading section called “Getting a Grip on the Topic” is designed to prepare students for the main reading text by activating their schemata on the topic; b) “Responding to the Main Reading” contains activities designed to activate the students’ responses to the text and to help them form points of view about the subject; c) “Going Deeply into the Topic” presents an alternative perspective on the theme; students read either a poem, short story, magazine article, or book extract and “negotiate the meaning of this second reading more independently, through a reader-response approach” (p. viii); d) in “Improving Writing Skills,” the focus is on the mechanics of writing, sequenced in order of complexity throughout the book, from “writing paragraphs with topic sentences” in chapter 1 to “taking exam essays” in chapter 8; e) in the last section of each chapter, students generate ideas for writing about the theme, engage in activities to expand their points of view, and then write, review, peer edit, revise and rewrite. The writing assignments are also sequenced throughout the course, from a “paragraph on birth order” in chapter 1 to an “argument essay on the relationship between development and quality of life” (p. v) in chapter 7.

Appendix A contains useful “Grammar and Punctuation Guidelines” and further writing skill exercises to supplement those in each chapter. “Complete Essay Assessment Guidelines” are provided for the teacher in Appendix B. [-1-] There are several notable features of the book. One is the use of a thematic approach, which, as Brandt (cited in Capossella, 1993, p. 76) argues, allows learners “to explore complex problems, conflicting viewpoints, and changes in understanding that occur with the acquisition of new knowledge.” In Write to be Read this approach helps students to consider each theme in depth and to develop an opinion about a topic before beginning to write an assignment. Furthermore, the themes chosen should be readily accessible to most learners. For example, the subject of arranged marriages in chapter 6 should encourage debate. In addition, this theme and the others in the book should be culturally appropriate to learners from a wide range of backgrounds.

Another positive feature is the use of collaborative activities before and after reading a text. These activities encourage an active response and also help students develop the skills they will need to participate in university seminars. Collaboration is also employed in peer appraisal of written drafts. This forces students to make decisions together and to consider other points of view apart from those of the teacher. Learners coming from backgrounds where collaborative learning is not the norm may require some training in these procedures at the start of the course. In addition, the objectives and utility of journal writing should also be clearly communicated to learners if this activity is to be successful (Lawrence, 1993).

Some readers may be surprised by the amount of reading material in the book. The reason for this is that reading and writing are not treated as separate skills, but are integrated at all stages and clearly linked, in accordance with the whole language philosophy. The texts also provide learners with material to practise valuable skills such as summarising or paraphrasing. In addition learners are encouraged to write a private journal entry after reading each text, which helps learners to find their own position (Pytlik, 1993), as well as develop their writing skills.

A common problem in most writing textbooks is how to develop writing skills without encouraging students to write essays that are formulaic. Some readers may feel that Write to be Read could be too prescriptive in this respect. For example, in relation to writing topic sentences, Smalzer tells students that “not all writers express the main idea in every paragraph, but for students trying to improve their writing, it is useful to express the main idea in a topic sentence” (p. 18). It appears that he considers these activities to be guidelines for students to follow when they are writing paragraphs and essays. The focus on writing skills in the fourth section of each chapter is deliberate, as Smalzer explains in the preface: “Teaching grammar outside the context of the student’s papers keeps the course focus on thinking and writing about ideas” (p. x). This is an example of how the book is designed to “focus on meaning rather than discrete skills . . .” (p. vii). If [-2-] we agree with Atkinson and Ramanathan that “prescriptivism” in writing textbooks is an “organic element in the field” (1995, p. 562), then at least Smalzer is stating his position openly to his readers.

Teachers and students alike will find that the text is easy to follow. The presentation is attractive, as each chapter contains high-quality photographs and illustrations. Students are encouraged to write on the printed page, in order to respond to questions or to add their comments. The instructions for each activity are very clear, and detailed guidelines for exercises are provided. Hence students should be able to work on their own for much of the time. All in all, Write to be Read provides a comprehensive range of spoken and written activities to develop reading as well as writing skills. The material is designed to integrate reading into the writing process and to encourage students to critically think about a range of topics in detail. Students also have an opportunity to write a variety of academic essays based on the themes in each chapter. The approach throughout the book is student- rather than teacher-centred, which is commendable. Most composition teachers should find this book to be a welcome addition to their courses.

End Note

[1] The main features of the whole language philosophy, according to Weaver (1990), are that “language is kept whole, not fragmented into skills; literacy skills and strategies are developed in the context of whole, authentic literacy events; while reading and writing experiences permeate the whole curriculum” (p. 3).

References

Atkinson, D. & Ramanathan, V. (1996). Cultures of writing: An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing/ language programs, TESOL Quarterly, 29, 547-568.

Capossella. T. (Ed). (1993). The critical thinking workshop: Designing writing assignments to foster critical thinking. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.

Lawrence, S. (1993). Making meaning through journal writing. In Capossella. T. (Ed). (1993). The critical thinking workshop: Designing writing assignments to foster critical thinking (pp. 165-177). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.

[-3-]
Pytlik, B. (1993). Sequencing writing assignments to foster critical thinking. In Capossella. T. (Ed). (1993). The critical thinking workshop: Designing writing assignments to foster critical thinking (pp. 71-93). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.

Weaver. C. (1990). Understanding whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.

Rupert Herington
Alfonso X El Sabio University (Madrid, Spain)
<rupert@uax.es>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-4-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.