• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

What Difference Does Difference Make? Teacher Reflections on Diversity, Literacy, and The Urban Primary School

September 1998 — Volume 3, Number 3

What Difference Does Difference Make? Teacher Reflections on Diversity, Literacy, and The Urban Primary School

Anne Haas Dyson with the San Francisco East Bay Teacher Study Group (1997)
Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
Pp. xii + 158
ISBN 0-8141-5657-6
US $16.95 (NCTE members, $12.95)

What Difference Does Difference Make? is the collective voice of elementary school teachers who have taught in urban settings for an average of twenty years each. Valuing the importance of “I,” and reconstructing the importance of identity among elementary school teachers in urban settings, Anne Haas Dyson reports the reflective stories of the practitioners, incorporating the notion of “we” into education.

The qualitative paradigm in research serves as a marvelous tool to express teachers’ voices, and to have classroom teachers tell their own stories. With this tool, the members of the San Francisco East Bay Teacher Study Group listened to and observed urban elementary school teachers who share their perspectives about how and when diversity makes a difference when young children participate actively in their own learning process. The result is a report on what diversity and literacy mean for both school children and teachers in urban settings. The book consists of six chapters plus a prologue, an epilogue, and a descriptive list of contributors to the project.

The prologue overviews and reconstructs the terminology used in the group’s talks in order to invigorate, provoke, and invite the reader in. It starts with a story of two first graders, which conceptualizes issues of “voice,” “many cultures,” and “identity” in light of the pluralism that is celebrated throughout the book. In the author’s words, this had “to be experienced in the very struggle to find the right words” (p. x). Dyson goes further to emphasize the importance of togetherness despite differences of color, culture, and nation state. In so doing, each individual school child becomes a symbol for the “Yin-Yang” of teaching.

The author gives each chapter two titles, one representing the category that emerged from the data, and the other representing the voices of the participants in the study. Including these voices in the titles makes the report more natural, and captures the feeling of the participants in school settings.

The first chapter of the book is an extension of the prologue in the sense that the notion of teaching in schools is reflected in “On the Meaning of Difference”/”Community Connection, Personal Response, and [-1-] Colloquial Support.” The role of community, the importance of the individual, and collaboration among teachers are emphasized in order to conceptualize the meaning of difference.

Chapter 2, “Relationships In and Out of the Classroom”/”Who Am I?” provokes an answer to the question and investigates how teachers perceive children with a hidden agenda: “Who am I to them?” This chapter summarizes teachers’ voices from their stances.

Chapters 3 and 4 shed light on children’s worlds in school settings. “Building Classroom Communities”/”I’m From Texas, What Are You?” and “Negotiating Permeable Activities”/”At First I Didn’t Understand” explore the way choices are made by linking teacher and child options, and represent the vivid and productive process of negotiation between teachers and children in classroom settings as they build their own community.

The next chapter, “Portraits of Children Learning”/”What Did You Think of Me?” focuses on school members and community involvement. It sheds light on the inner worlds of children as they become bilingual by learning another language in school. In addition, the author shows how children negotiated their understanding of school and home and includes parental involvement in schools.

Extending the conversation, the last chapter in the book carries a message from the teachers to their peers in the form of a story about making a difference in a learning environment rather than dictating what to do. As the second title to the chapter indicates, “It is Not About Telling You What to Do.” Rather, it is a collective expression of teachers’ reflections about the nature of teaching in multicultural and multilingual environments.

Teachers must be discerning when it comes to putting theory into practice. As practitioners, they are well aware of the fact that much theory may not reflect the realities of classroom practice. One of the strengths of this book is that Dyson and the San Francisco East Bay Teacher Study Group present their perspective from the realities of the classrooms.

This book represents urban school classrooms with diverse populations. The issues these teachers faced are similar in many ways to those faced by ESL teachers, who will benefit from reading teachers’ and students’ perspectives about the patterns hidden in multicultural classrooms.

Believing that “the essence of the child’s developmental challenge is . . . to develop a holistic but flexible system” (p. 298), Dyson helps us rethink the challenge of making a difference in children’s lives, including school teachers, community support, and academia. What Difference Does Difference Make? not only presents the way [-2-] children make their own worlds, but also lets us hear them speak about their worlds in their own voices.

Arif Altun
University of Cincinnati
<altunar@email.uc.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.