• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Solo,Duo, Trio: Puzzles and Games for Building English Language Skills

July 1999 — Volume 4, Number 1

Solo,Duo, Trio: Puzzles and Games for Building English Language Skills

Richard Yorkey (1997)
Brattleboro, VT: Pro Lingua Associates
Pages x + 166
ISBN 0-86647-091-3 (paper)
US $23.00

[Editor’s Note: TESL-EJ notes with sorrow the passing of Richard Yorkey. He was professor emeritus of St. Michael’s College at the time of his death in November, 1998. His connection with St. Michael’s goes back 25 years, and before that he had taught at the TESOL Centre at Concordia University in Montreal, and at the American University of Beirut. Professor Yorkey continued designing the innovative and teacher-friendly materials that were his hallmark until shortly before his death. When the author of this review heard about Yorkey’s death, he commented, “I had the idea he was a fairly young man who, by nature of producing such books as Solo, Duo, Trio, was not only still obviously extremely keen on ELT but still bursting with energy.” He was.]

Introduction

Busy language teachers will fully understand the author’s desire to prepare the material on which this book is based. In order to give fair attention to the individuals in his classes who needed it, Yorkey found it worthwhile to keep others who had completed the lesson’s work occupied with language puzzles.

Content, Uses and Users

The material in Solo, Duo, Trio is written for harried teachers who often need to resort to time fillers or easily reproduced exercises that focus clearly on one topic. This book contains a total of 128 puzzles, including eighteen different types. Each puzzle may be photocopied and distributed to individual learners, pairs, small groups, or whole classes. Permission to duplicate tasks is granted by the publisher on the condition that they be used for learners working with a teacher or tutor in a classroom or resource centre. All pages in Solo, Duo, Trio are easily detached for ease of duplicating. Learners using this book can work on the same puzzle simultaneously, or students can work independently according to their own ability and speed. Learners working solo will be able to take their time, reflect and experiment with being self-reliant; duos and trios sharing the same puzzle will be able to work cooperatively, discuss meaning, and have fun playing together with the language. Using such puzzles and games helps establish a relaxed classroom atmosphere in which barriers to learning are lowered so learners are free to learn. The author indicates in the table of contents the level of learner ability that each activity is written for. Complete answers to all activities are provided at the end of each section.

Reading Activities

The reading activities in Solo, Duo, Trio are different from material normally seen in similar reading resource books. This book requires students to search for meaning by intelligent guessing. For example, when only the top half of words in a short [-1-] paragraph is provided, learners have to work out what it would say if the bottom half were also provided. Other reading tasks at sentence level and beyond are found in the Jumbled Stories section, which requires learners to correctly re-order mixed-up parts of short dialogues. The jumbled stories are quite brief, usually consisting of eight or nine short sentences, and are more suited to learners working individually rather than those in groups. All activities of this type are for intermediate level learners.

Using Top Half Reading activities for the first time, teachers will probably be surprised at how much learners enjoy completing such tasks and how well they can perform given only limited amounts of information. Of the nine tasks in this section, three are at elementary level, four at intermediate and two at advanced. Teachers could usefully make such tasks far more difficult by either reducing the size of fonts or providing only the bottom half of words instead of the top.

In the What are you Reading? section, learners have to identify and label, according to options provided, brief samples of text that have been taken from a variety of genres. Learners will be familiar with genres such as dictionaries, telephone directories and encyclopaedias. A useful extension activity is to ask the class what they found within the text sample that helps to differentiate it from other genres. Very often the answer to this question is related to text layout rather than lexical content. Activities in this section require very close reading and are written for learners at the intermediate level and beyond.

Proverb Activities

Solo, Duo, Trio also contains three vastly different and extremely motivating types of puzzles relating to many of the most common proverbs in English. In the activities in the Matching Proverbs section, all of which are for learners at elementary to intermediate level, matching the first part of a proverb with its ending is all that is required. Examples include An apple a day . . . , If something’s worth doing . . . , and Don’t count your chickens . . . . Although proverbs such as these and A miss is as good as mile are clearly understood by native users of English, for second language learners they are far more problematic. Asking groups to explain the proverbial meaning as well as the literal meaning is a useful starting point for a lively, whole-class discussion.

In the two other task types dealing with proverbs, Hidden Wisdom and Double Crostic Puzzles, learners have to answer a variety of questions before inserting the correct letters contained in each answer into boxes. With these letters they have to construct whole proverbs such as Never look a gift horse in the mouth. The nine activities in the Hidden Wisdom section are for learners at [-2-] elementary, intermediate and advanced levels; those in the Double Crostic section are at intermediate and advanced levels. Both types of activity are fairly challenging and initially the teacher may need to explain the correct procedure using simple examples.

Word Level Activities

Activities that require learners to focus on words include five anagram stories, word searches containing between 25 and 35 words, and choosing the odd one out among groups of five words (e.g., nose, eye, mouth, ear, foot). Of these, word searches are clearly the most popular and tended to keep my classes busy for up to twenty minutes when working individually. Although some of these tasks deal with isolated but related groups of words (e.g., money and banking in the word searches), others involve discovering individual words based on the surrounding context and co-text of paragraphs (e.g., the text about a trip to the theatre on page 1). After discovering the odd word among the group of five, teachers could easily extend this to ask the group why foot is the correct answer to the example given above.

Riddles, Puzzles and Jokes

The 17 pages of riddles and jokes are written for learners at all three levels and are progressively more challenging. They work in a way similar to the double crostic activities described above. The difference is that the solution, instead of being a proverb, is the correct answer to a riddle such as “What can you have after someone has taken it?” (a photograph), or “Why didn’t the skeleton have good time at the dance?” (because she had no body to dance with).

The author of Solo, Duo, Trio has put together an entertaining, stimulating and highly useful resource book, filled with brief vocabulary and reading activities that can be easily extended. From his generally original ideas, teachers will very easily be able to design their own tasks based on the lexical content of any course they may be teaching.

Wayne Trotman
Özel Çakabey Lisesi, Izmir, Turkey
<wayne@egenet.com.tr>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.


[-3-]

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.