• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Effective Programs for Latino Students

September 2001 — Volume 5, Number 2

Effective Programs for Latino Students

Edited by Robert E. Slavin and Margarita Calderon (2001)
Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates
Pp. ix + 394
ISBN 0-8058-3413-3
US $39.95 (paper)
US $89.95 (cloth)

This book fills well a gap in knowledge about outcomes of programs designed to enhance academic achievement of Latino students in mainly primary and secondary schools. It presents a broad overview of the current state of research on effective instructional programs with many Latino students. The underlying themes throughout this collection of articles are that Latino students can succeed at the highest levels if given quality instruction, and reform of schools is possible and imperative.

Effective Programs for Latino Students has ten articles describing many effective programs for Latino students and related aspects of Latino students. It has a Preface, Author Index and Subject Index. A bibliography for each article is at the end of the article.

The first article, Olatokunbo S. Fashola, Robert E. Slavin, Margarita Calderon and Richard Duran outline the diversity of Latino students. Then, they give three principles that guided them in reviewing programs: effectiveness in rigorous evaluations, replicability, and successful evaluation or application to schools serving many Latino students. They then report on twenty-nine effective programs, classified into school-wide reform, classroom instructional, curriculum-specific in reading, writing and Language Arts, curriculum-specific in mathematics and early childhood, and tutoring programs. Finally, they identify four overall factors contributing to program effectiveness: a) clear goals with linked methods and materials and constant assessment of students’ progress; b) well-specified materials, components and professional development procedures; c) extensive professional development; and d) dissemination of the program.

In the second article, Olatokunbo S. Fashola and Robert Slavin review research about six effective dropout prevention and college attendance programs. The principles for inclusion on this list were the same as in the first article. The authors conclude with six themes common to these programs, which were personalization of content, having an attainable future, help with specific courses and study strategies, and status and recognition for success.

Ann Lockwood focused on effective elementary, middle and high school programs. Three programs, Success for All in an elementary school, the Coca-Cola Valued Youth Program in a middle school, and Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) in two high schools, were described in depth. Their implementation problems and successes were emphasized.

In the fourth article, by Margarita Calderon and Angelia Carreon, a three-year study documented the process of design and implementation of two-way bilingual programs in two schools. This article also discussed successes and failures in the schools and cautions that implementation of this program takes constant hard work. Eight other recommendations centered on making a commitment to positive work relations, collegial learning, and letting go of comfortable routines for schools attempting this. Also, the authors emphasize that implementation of a two-way bilingual program should be integrated in multiple subject matter courses in both languages across grade levels. [-1-]

William M. Saunders describes ongoing case studies of an anonymous Southern California school district that is designing, implementing and evaluating an effective five-year transition program for Spanish-speaking students for literacy in both Spanish and English. He first characterizes transitional programs and gives benefits and caveats of them. Results of the study indicate that careful program design and evaluation coupled with successive grade-by-grade achievement can result in a successful program. He says that significant results can happen if the school district emphasizes quality of instruction in early grades, adopts a long term approach to transition, establishes a curriculum for the transition, and maintains L1 instruction in language arts during the first year of transition. Also, a useful appendix of twelve most beneficial components for a language arts program is given.

In the next article, Robert, E. Slavin and Nancy Madden summarize research on Success for All (SFA), an elementary school reading program designed to improve reading achievement for all students. Slavin and Madden’s summary focuses on the academic achievement of the ESL learners in three ESL adaptations of Success for All programs and three studies of Exito Por Todos (EPT), the Spanish bilingual equivalent of the same program. All of these programs demonstrated substantial positive results. The authors call for more research to be done regarding the individual components of the program, ethnographic information about SFA/EPT, more longitudinal study in larger districts, and on instructional strategies enabling success for students in reading, regardless of the language of instruction.

In the seventh article, a preliminary ethnography of Success for All focusing on two schools in southern California and three in eastern Texas was done by Patricia L. Prado-Olmos. This study discusses the successes and challenges of implementing the program. Padro-Olmos also indicates that within SFA/EPT, classrooms were qualitatively different, one having more student freedom than the other.

Margarita Calderon provides descriptions of curricula and methodologies used to teach reading in English for Spanish-speaking Limited English Proficient students. This article focuses mainly on reading English, but also includes ESL, bilingual literacy and other factors such as sociocultural, classroom and school characteristics and professional development of teachers. She divides her description into ten parts. After this exhaustive description, she then offers a combined approach to teaching reading in English that consists of twenty-two components. In the final section of the article gives a very useful list of questions that schools should ask when they are implementing a reading program.

The ninth article, written by Gilbert Narro Garcia, offers a three-part analysis of factors which may influence whether a Latino student is at risk of educational failure. These three categories are personally focused, environmentally focused and school and learning-conditions focused. The factors are lengthy lists of statements derived from many U.S. Department of Education Statistics. The factors are impressive in their insight, breadth and accuracy. [-2-]

In the book’s last article, Martha Montero-Sieburth gives an overview of more than twenty explanatory models used for Latino academic achievement, from the most traditional views to the most current trends. She concludes by offering six very useful suggestions about academic achievement that could enhance the Latino educational experience.

This book is an important one, providing a comprehensive overview and a wealth of statistics and description and reviews of research about an ever-growing segment of the US population. The book takes an optimistic view of what Latino students can achieve and what schools with Latino students can be while acknowledging the obstacles to their success. It is a book that should be required reading for teacher training programs. It would also be useful to policy makers and researchers in helping to make decisions about successful programs for Latinos. The information should also be available to the general public and their political representatives, so positive programs can be used as examples to obtain more funding for effective programs, rather than advocating English Only policies and the end to bilingual programs.

Jim Bame
Utah State University
<fabame@cc.usu.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.