• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Participatory Practices in Adult Education

December 2001 — Volume 5, Number 3

Participatory Practices in Adult Education

Pat Campbell and Barbara Burnaby, eds. (2001)
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Pp. x–318
ISBN 0-8058-3705-1 (Paper)
US $34.50 Cloth: US $74.95

Participatory Practices in Adult Education purports to “provide concrete models and suggestions to practitioners and participants in a wide variety of adult education settings who want to increase the participatory nature of their activities.” [vii] To a large extent, the book fulfills its stated purpose. Those readers willing to wade through the ideology-driven passages of Participatory Practices will be richly rewarded. This book offers many thought-provoking ideas, suggestions, and challenges to the practitioner open to receiving them. Educators, administrators, human resource managers, policy makers, and community development workers will all find exciting new doors to enter on its pages.

For those readers unfamiliar with participatory education, the phrase does not simply refer to increased learner participation in the educational process, be it in classroom activities, curriculum development, or policy planning. Although it may share overlapping concerns, participatory education differs from both student-centered learning and popular education. [189] Participatory educators work towards a specific goal, and they do so by using somewhat specific means.

In her introduction to Participatory Practices, co-editor Pat Campbell defines this goal as “building a just society through individual and socioeconomic transformation and ending domination through changing power relations. ” [6] Campbell’s definition is echoed by Auerbach, who writes that the “goal of participatory education, as I see it, is . . . to . . . promote critical reflection with a view toward acting for change.” [276] Nash’s definition is clearer still: “A participatory approach is based on the belief that the purpose of education is to expand the ability of people to become the shapers of their world by analyzing the social forces that have historically limited their options.” [188]

Although Campbell notes that “there are no pat solutions to the question ‘how to do it’; there is no method to follow or prescription to rely on” [9-10], there are certain practices and beliefs shared by the contributors to this book. Participatory education is seen as a cyclical process during which participants identify and share problems from their daily lives. Then as a group, they move from reflecting on the individual experience of these problems to more critical social analysis, to constructing an understanding of the social conditions affecting them, and then to developing strategies for action and change. [276] Learners and educators are seen as equal participants in this process with educators relinquishing and students assuming positions of power and control. [Chs. 3 and 4] Exploring social identity (race, gender, class, intellectual and physical abilities, location, and language) and how it affects power and powerlessness is an integral part of the process. [9, 41]

Participatory Practices is well organized and comprehensive in its coverage. It is divided into six sections, four of which focus on participatory projects in different educational settings. Section II covers adult basic education, ESL and literacy; Section III describes community-based programs; Section IV discusses workplace education; and Section V covers institutional settings. More than a dozen practitioners from diverse backgrounds present and evaluate programs with which they have been involved. A participatory prisoner education program; a rural town meeting; a participatory doctoral program in adult education; a learners’ leadership project; a collaborative training program between Alcan and the Canadian Auto Workers; and a peer tutoring program in a community literacy center are just a few of the many programs presented. Readers may want to head directly to the section most relevant to their work, but no matter where one’s professional interest lies, every chapter offers provocative and interesting information. [-1-]

Articles include not only practical information but also summaries of the latest research in the field. For example, in “Participatory Workplace Education: Resisting Fear-Driven Models,” Andrea Nash starts by defining the “contradictions and mixed messages” that arise in a workplace teaching context. Her helpful discussion is grounded in the latest research on workplace ethnographies, which “raise questions about the worker deficit rhetoric by pointing out workplace constraints that prevent workers from using and expanding the skills and knowledge they already have.” [186] This discussion alerts the reader to critical issues that will arise in the planning and implementation of workplace programs.

Nash then defines and contrasts two approaches to workplace education, the functional-context and the participatory approaches, showing the weaknesses of the former and providing a four-step guide for applying the principles of the latter. The final section of the article describes three programs that illustrate participatory principles in action. Readers gain not only a useful theoretical framework from this article, but also a clear understanding of two possible models to follow and how the implementation of one model took place in three different settings. Although some of the selections in Participatory Practices in Adult Education are longer and less well-organized, the articles in Sections II–V generally offer a survey of relevant research, practical models and applications, and examples from real-life situations.

The first and last sections of this book are more contemplative in nature. In Section I, Reflections on Foundations, Virginia Sauv³ presents the core principles of participation that she has drawn from her many years experience in ESL, adult basic education, and community and workplace program development. Her discussion encompasses a definition of participatory education and the three sets of principles on which she believes it rests: the foundation principles of respect, hope, faith, and compassion; the working principles of participation, community and commitment; and the concurrent principles of risk, trust and trustworthiness, honesty, and acknowledgment. Sauv³ tells readers not to take her principles as methodologies but “simply as an accounting of my personal discoveries”, and urges them to develop their own participatory philosophy. [19]

Section VI, Reflections on Practice, reviews and ties together issues and themes that run throughout the book. Elsa Auerbach’s ” ‘Yes, But . . .’ Problematizing Participatory ESL Pedagogy,” is particularly stimulating. Auerbach rarely shrinks from confronting difficult issues head-on, and this article is no exception. In “Yes But . . .”, she thoughtfully responds to issues and problems encountered by students in her Adult ESL in Theory and Practice class at the University of Massachusetts, Boston when they tried to implement participatory practices in the ESL classroom. Their objections include such statements as: “But my students want grammar.”; “What right do we have to bring political issues into the classroom?”; “I don’t want to be a social worker.”; and “It’s just too complicated.” [268]

This article is a “must read” for ESL (and other) practitioners, especially those who feel the participatory approach is “impractical” for their classes. Rather than simply dismissing her students as victims of oppression who are blind to their own victimization or as members of a privileged group unwilling to share their power, Auerbach acknowledges and responds to the real concerns that they have. The result is a powerful case in favor of the principles she embraces.

The only real flaw in Participatory Practices is the sometimes heavy-handed ideological rhetoric that characterizes some of its articles. Passages such as the following distract from the real meat of this book:

We drew from a Marxist analysis that work within capitalist industrialization had alienated workers from the sources and processes of production, from any connection to the whole product (which, in contrast, the craftsperson experienced). In the same light, we suggested that artistic and media production, too, had become commodified and specialized, alienating most of us from any sense of being producers or makers of culture or cultural expression. [42]

Still with us today, this dualism [of Descartes] is reflected in western education systems that divide knowledge into subjects and disciplines, that privilege co-called intellectual over manual labor. [42]

Socialist adult educators bring to the education situation a necessary expertise and they initially assume a position of authority and leadership (a position which is itself the product of the unequal personal development that capitalism generates). They take responsibility for making their expertise available in a way that will further the learners’ interests. They participate in a collaborative process which aims to raise the level of awareness and competence of the learners and hence their position is not static. [70-71]

[-2-]

Nevertheless, the education community is sorely in need of people who ask difficult questions and then work hard with others to generate answers. By and large, the authors of this book do just that. The model projects are interesting, the practical information useful, the articles well-written and documented, and the intent of the book worthwhile. For those practitioners already firm in the participatory education camp, this book offers not only strong philosophical and pedagogical reinforcement but also interesting model projects and useful practical information. For the uninitiated practitioner, the book invites you to reflect on your own teaching practice and the beliefs on which it is based, and at least to open the door to some of the new pathways offered on its pages. Overall, Participatory Practices in Adult Education is highly recommended.

Joanne Wilkens
Second Start, Concord, NH
<jwilkens@second-start.org>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.