• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Tapestry: Writing 1 and 2

December 2001 — Volume 5, Number 3

Tapestry: Writing 1

Rebecca Oxford (Series Ed.) and Meredith Pike-Baky. (2000).
Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Pp. xiii + 205.
ISBN 083840033-7. (paper)
US $27.95.

Tapestry: Writing 2

Rebecca Oxford (Series Ed.), Meredith Pike-Baky and Laurie Blass. (2000).
Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Pp. xiii + 205.
ISBN 083840038-8. (paper)
US $27.95.

Introduction and Description of Organization

For the past several years, I have been looking for a writing textbook that actually has a good amount of build-up exercises, activities, supplemental resources and good writing guidance for my high beginning EFL students. Tapestry: Writing 1 & 2 from Heinle & Heinle, which I have been using lately, get very high marks in most of these areas, with only a few shortcomings. In general, these books have many activities that help students build up and practice skills for the actual writing assignment at the end of each unit. In addition, the Tapestry series does a nice job of incorporating study skills and supplemental resources, such as CNN video clips and a website for learners and teachers.

The themes of the units covered in these books are fairly standard for writing textbooks, and include topics such as “Stories of Success”, “Spaces That Work”, “Never Too Old” in Tapestry: Writing 1, and “I’ll never forget. . .” “Personal Heroes”, and “How Did You Learn That?” inTapestry: Writing 2.

Skills Covered

Tapestry: Writing 1 uses these themed units to present basic grammar points such as past and present tense, countable and uncountable nouns, capital letters, and ends with items such as pronouns, cause and result sentences, and word parts. The writing skills covered in book one include free writing, brainstorming, working through drafts, reading to improve your writing at the beginning stage, and using peer feedback. Tapestry: Writing 2 covers more advanced grammar points, such as past tense, past perfect tense, phrasal verbs, and time clauses. In Tapestry: Writing 2, skills such as narrating, describing people and places, explaining meaning, evaluating and summarizing, and predicting are covered.[-1-]

Unit Organization

Each unit starts by setting goals in the areas of study skills, grammar, and writing skills. Following this is an introduction to new vocabulary, a CNN video section, and a study skill section as well. The unit also includes writing activities, grammar instruction, trivia information related to the theme of the unit, and a chart to check learners’ achievement.

Next come a substantial writing sample and activities to help students become familiar with basic writing skills, such as adding details and supporting their opinions.

Finally, each unit leads up to a writing assignment that allows learners to demonstrate their ability to use the skills and concepts learned in the unit.

Features

Teaching study skills to help students build basic learning strategies is something that ESL teachers have come to expect from the Tapestry series. These skills are presented in two sections per unit. The Language Learning Strategies section in Tapestry: Writing 1 includes skills such as using visual maps to develop ideas, using a thesaurus, and grouping new vocabulary. The Academic Power Strategies section details more general strategies such as finding the best study environment, using campus resources, and studying with a partner. While these sections are not necessarily closely related to the topic of the unit, they are well done and useful.

Heinle and Heinle even has a website for both teachers and their students who use the textbooks. They have small quizzes that learners can take and then have their scores sent automatically to their teachers via email. This website also has resource books for teachers which can be easily downloaded and printed out after getting the password from a Heinle and Heinle representative.

Another teacher-friendly feature is the checklist for both writers and their peer-reviewers at the end of each unit. Not only do these checklists remind students to review their writing carefully for grammatical and structural points, they also ask if the authors have included targeted skills such as including details and using different adjectives to describe a person.

Commentary

There are some outstanding aspects of the features in this writing series which make them very teacher- and student-friendly.

First of all, finding writing samples in writing textbooks is nothing surprising. However, I have found writing samples in other textbooks too difficult and intimidating for my high-beginning EFL students, which was, surprisingly, not the case with the samples in this series. The writing samples provided models that my students might actually be able to successfully emulate. This is just one of the things I have come to appreciate about these textbooks.

However, there are a few other points that I really appreciate about these books. For instance, the activities to build up basic writing skills are usually shown in a very simple, step-by-step manner, making it very easy for even basic-level students to understand. Next, although the topic selection is somewhat predictable, the units are made more personal by including many writing samples on the topics by real ESL students at various proficiency levels. Finally, the checklists for writers to check their own writing at the end of each unit seem to have helped my students reflect more on their own writing instead of just turning in their papers automatically because time is up. This feature, coupled with the fact that the writing criteria are made clear throughout the entire unit’s writing process, really seems to help students understand better what they need to do and why they receive the grades they do.

As much as I like these textbooks, there are a few weak points. One of the weaknesses of this writing series is that there is such a thing as too much of a good thing. Although the build-up activities are quite effective, the amount of activities and sample writing can be excessive and repetitive at times. However, in my classes we have overcome this problem by deciding as a class which activities are best suited to the purposes of the class. For example, I have been using the level 2 in both my freshman and sophomore writing classes at a junior college in Japan. The freshman class, being the more motivated of the two classes, shows a great interest in the learning strategies sections, and they take them very seriously in hopes of achieving better academically. The sophomore class, on the other hand, perceives them as just another pop-psychology test. These varying attitudes determine which activities to cover for each class.

Another limitation in this series is that these books do not offer enough actual writing practice. If students can fly through unit after unit in a very short time, they might have an adequate number of opportunities to actually practice writing. However, in my multi-level EFL classes, that usually does not happen. As a result, what happens is that there is a lack of time spent on actual writing since much of the class time is spent on build-up exercises. I deal with this by frequently assigning students journals and short writing assignments. [-2-]

Although this is not a major point, the companion web site could be improved considerably by adding more resources for teachers such as ready-to-print handouts. My colleagues and I also felt that the quizzes they have on their web site are too broad. Each quiz only covers one complete unit, which my classes sometimes take up to 6 sessions to finish. In addition, the quizzes mix both vocabulary and targeted skills. This makes it nearly impossible to use them if the class skips parts of the vocabulary or skills presented in the textbooks.

In general, my students appreciate the Tapestry: Writing books for their clear structure, easy-to-apply vocabulary, and the detailed explanations. I can see very clearly the improvement in my freshman class after finishing the first semester, covering units 1, 2, and 4. They now are able to add a great amount of personal flavour to their writing by following the book’s suggestion on how to add details. In other words, they are more careful with the content instead of just focusing on structure and grammar: What is more, they seem to truly enjoy writing.

Even for my very mixed level sophomore students, Tapestry: Writing 2 has been working fairly well. It has various topics they can explore with tons of examples. They can write papers following the very explicit directions so that the final products are usually of acceptable quality. I have also been occasionally surprised at the quality of the writing that the lower level students can achieve with a little help on organization. The better students can also benefit more by doing the sections that the rest of the class skips in each unit.

In conclusion, although there is sometimes an overload of build-up activities in this series, it is certainly better to be able to skip a few activities than to have to create your own handouts to fill gaps in your textbook. Of course, the most important point when choosing a textbook is that it suits your students’ needs. That is, it is the right level for the students, has engaging topics, and an easy-to-follow structure. If you are looking for a good textbook for low-intermediate level writers, you could do a lot worse than the Tapestry series. These are some of the best writing textbooks I have used.

Maiko Hata
Senzoku Gakuen Junior College
<maihata@hotmail.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-3-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.