• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Language as Cultural Practice: Mexicanos en el Norte

Vol. 6. No. 3 — December 2002

Language as Cultural Practice: Mexicanos en el Norte


Sandra R. Schecter & Robert Bayley (2002)
Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Pp. 224
ISBN 0-8058-3534-2
$24.50 U.S. Also available in cloth, $55.00 U.S.

This book presents an ethnographic study of Mexican-background families living in California and Texas. To illustrate the complexity and diversity of being bilingual, the authors indicate the need to consider the social identities of speakers–including their gender, ethnicity, and racial and class backgrounds as well as the context in which they are going to learn and use their languages. They show that language choices and patterns of use in sociocultural and sociohistorical contexts is a dynamic, and fluid process. They clearly show in their case studies that as our lives change the dominant language may change also. The authors convincingly explain that these changes are accompanied by strong emotions that deserve to be considered.

Schecter and Bayley address the important relationship between familial patterns of language use and the development of bilingualism and biliteracy among language-minority children. They compare patterns of meaning suggested by the use of Spanish and English in different speech and literacy activities, as well as by the importance ascribed by families and societal institutions to the maintenance and use of the two languages.

The authors’ main agenda is to look at the depth of the relationship between the family language environment and bilingual development in places where both the minority and the dominant languages would be used (Spanish and English). They chose the San Francisco Bay Area and San Antonio because these cities have a large number of immigrants living there and also because families are located along a broad socioeconomic spectrum that is representative of the demographics of Latinos in the United States.

Their study involved 40 Mexican-background families, 20 from California and 20 from Texas. The families had a wide variety of social and economic backgrounds, occupations, and resident neighborhoods. Each family had at least one parent with a Mexican background and at least one child (fourth, fifth, or sixth grade level) as the main focus of the study. There were a total of at least four recorded interviews with each family, two with the parents, two with the child of study, and sibling interviews if possible. English and Spanish writing samples and oral narratives of the child were obtained, when available. [-1-]

Out of the 40 families, 8 families were selected as intensive case studies. The families’ profile ranged from rural families in south Texas to upper middle class professional families in northern California, and also included families with monolingual Spanish parents and families that spoke primarily English. During these intensive studies, at least 12 home observations were recorded.

Authors cover many important areas of bilingualism. For the language and cultural identification chapter, the authors look at the symbolic importance to the families of both English and Spanish, the cultural transmission that occurred, the role of schooling “. . . in supporting family members’ idealized social constructs,” and the patterns of meaning, both in speech and literary performances of the families (p. 52). In relation to maintenance of the Spanish language, the authors evaluate the strategies used by the families in rural, urban, and suburban areas. The topics covered include language revival, Spanish only in the home, the co-existence of Spanish in the home and learning to read and write Spanish in school, and maintaining Spanish without native-speaking adults present. In a chapter on the narrative production across the bilingual continuum, the authors look at the relationship between language maintenance and the development of literacy in both the native and foreign languages.

In their investigation of “doing school at home,” the authors focus on parent-child and sibling-sibling school-related interactions, such as helping with homework. They show that the families adapted the school agenda for Spanish maintenance and use academic literacy as a home and school language or as an inaccessible language. The authors look at language socialization that includes the diachronic and synchronic perspectives, as well as the definition and role of culture. In the final chapter the authors give some structure to the diverse and complex language practices of Mexican-American families. They summarize their findings in relation to the complex issue of language socialization, language maintenance, literacy development, and schooling, and eventually present the implications of their findings for language educators, policy makers, and other advocates for linguistic-minority learners. Finally they finish up the chapter by addressing language norms and the debate on bilingualism and give suggestions for its reformulation. Schecter and Bayley encourage all of us to become activists in fighting narrow definitions of bilingualism that ignore a diversity of practices and exclude the views of those most directly affected.

Educators will find this book extremely useful because it looks at the developmental and social aspects of bilingualism. It gives educators detailed information on language usage in Mexican-American families’ homes. The information in this book can help an educator understand his or her students and the student’s family better. The educator can begin to understand the importance of both English and Spanish to parents and children in Mexican-American homes. An educator can learn about the students’ daily struggles with language and education and the way Mexican-American families feel about Spanish that is offered to their children in school to help maintain their children’s Spanish. The educator can begin to understand the use and acceptance of code-switching in families. Finally, the educator can learn about the reasons that families and children may want to maintain their native language, such as the ability to keep in touch with family in Mexico or family that does not understand English, to communicate with non-English speaking friends and the community they live in, and even to succeed in the business world more effectively.

Overall, this book greatly enhances our understanding of bilingual development in the family and the dynamics of bilingual communities, shows diversity within Mexican families in the United States, provides evidence to correct the common misconception that maintenance of Spanish interferes with the acquisition of English, and finally shows the complex dynamics of language socialization. The book will be of use for researchers in linguistics and education, educators, and those interested in language socialization and learning.

Editor’s note: For more information, see: https://www.erlbaum.com/shop/tek9.asp?pg=products&specific=0-8058-3533-4

Zohreh Eslami-Rasekh
Texas A&M University, College of Education
Dept. of Teaching, Learning, and Culture
Multicultural/Urban/ESL/International Education
<zrasekh@coe.tamu.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-2-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.