• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

The Quest for Practical Web Usage

March 2003 — Volume 6, Number 4

From the Editor

Webquests are fast becoming a popular tool in all subject areas–but just exactly what is a webquest and how can language teachers make–and use–them? In this article Gavin Dudeney takes a look at the origins of webquests and at how they can be implemented in the language classroom.

Vance Stevens, Editor
On the Internet



The Quest for Practical Web Usage

by
Gavin Dudeney,
International House, Barcelona

Bernie Dodge of San Diego State University was one of the first people to attempt to define and structure this kind of learning activity. According to him, a webquest is an “inquiry-oriented activity in which some or all of the information that learners interact with comes from resources on the internet…”. (Dodge, 1995).

This definition has been refined over the years, and adapted for various different disciplines. Philip Benz (owner of the English Multiverse) describes a webquest as follows:

A “WebQuest” is a constructivist approach to learning…. Students not only collate and organize information they’ve found on the web, they orient their activities towards a specific goal they’ve been given, often associated with one or more roles modeled on adult professions. Since students have to participate in the elaboration of their learning strategies, the level of autonomy and creative production they attain is increased. With the proper guidance and “scaffolding” students can accomplish far more actual learning than in traditional transmission-of-knowledge situations that so often leave them wishing they were anywhere but in the classroom.( Benz, 2001)

Essentially, then, we might consider webquests to be mini-projects in which a large percentage of the input and material is supplied by the Internet. Webquests can be teacher-made or learner-made, depending on the learning activity the teacher decides on.

Why use Webquests?

There are many compelling reasons for using webquests in the classroom, including:

  • They are a relatively easy way for teachers to begin to incorporate the Internet into the language classroom, on both a short-term and long-term basis–no specialist technical knowledge is needed either to produce or use them.
  • More often than not, they are group activities and as a result tend to lend themselves to communication and the sharing of knowledge–two principal goals of language teaching itself.
  • They can be used simply as a linguistic tool, but can also be interdisciplinary, allowing for cross-over into other departments and subject areas (where applicable). This can often give them a more ‘real-world’ look and feel, and provide greater motivation for the learner.
  • They encourage critical (or higher level) thinking skills (see Marzano, 1992), including: comparing, classifying, inducing, deducing, analyzing errors, constructing support, abstraction, analyzing perspectives, etc. Learners are not able to simply regurgitate information they find, but are guided towards a transformation of that information in order to achieve a given task.
  • They are both motivating and authentic tasks (if well-designed) and encourage learners to view the activities they are doing as something “real” or “useful.” This inevitably leads to more effort, greater concentration and a real interest in task achievement. This, coupled with real-life material and input, can be a greater motivator than outdated coursebooks and other such teaching materials.

Structure of a webquest

Webquests have now been around long enough for them to have a clearly-defined structure. However, this structure–whilst being unofficially recognised as the definitive schema for these activities–should only really be taken as a basic guideline and you should design your webquests to suit the needs and learning styles of your group.

There are usually four main sections to a webquest:

  • Introduction
  • This stage is normally used to introduce the overall theme of the webquest. It involves giving background information on the topic and, in the language learning context, often introduces key vocabulary and concepts which learners will need to understand in order to complete the tasks involved.

  • Task

    The Task section of the webquest explains clearly and precisely what the learners will have to do as they work their way through the webquest. The task should obviously be highly motivating and intrinsically interesting for the learners, and should be firmly anchored in a real-life situation. This often involves the learners in a certain amount of role-play within a given scenario (e.g., you are the school social organiser and have to organise a trip for your class to an English-speaking country…).

  • Process
  • The Process stage of a webquest guides the learners through a set of activities and research tasks, using a set of pre-defined resources. These resources–in the case of a webquest–are predominately web-based, and are usually presented in clickable form within the task document (it’s important to bear in mind that it’s much easier to click on a link than to type it in with any degree of accuracy). In the case of a language based webquest, the Process stage of the webquest may introduce (or recycle) lexical areas or grammatical points which are essential to the Task. The Process stage of the webquest will usually have one (or sometimes several) “products” which the learners are expected to present at the end. These “products” will often form the basis of the Evaluation stage (see below.)

  • Evaluation
  • The Evaluation stage can involve learners in self-evaluation, comparing and contrasting what they have produced with other learners and giving feedback on what they feel they have learnt, achieved, etc. It will also involve teacher evaluation of the same, and good webquests will give guidance to the teacher for this particular part of the process.

Since Bernie Dodge developed his model in 1995, many educators have added both to the theory and the practice of webquests, and it is now possible to find several good examples of them in many different subject areas.

Producing a webquest

Producing a webquest does not entail any real degree of detailed technical knowledge. Whilst all of the examples below are essentially web-based, it is not at all beyond the capabilities of language instructors with rudimentary IT skills to produce a professional-looking and workable design using any modern word processor. The skillset for producing a webquest might be defined as follows:

  • Research Skills
  • It is essential to be able to search the Internet and to quickly and accurately find resources. The best search engines currently available are Google (http://www.google.com)–for wide searches over a large database of websites–and Yahoo (http://www.yahoo.com) for a more theme-based approach. It is beyond the scope of this article to delve into the finer points of using search engines and subject guides, but a good reading of their respective help pages will dramatically improve the accuracy of any search.

  • Analytical Skills
  • It is also very important to be able to cast a critical eye over the resources you do find when searching. The Internet was once described as “vanity publishing gone mad,” and it is worth bearing in mind that quality is not guaranteed–make sure to visit any website you are considering using thoroughly before basing any activity around it. Simply because the author of the website believes elephants to be bulletproof (a real example…) doesn’t mean that they really are.

  • Production Skills
  • You will also need to be able to use a word processor to combine text, images and weblinks into a finished document. This particular set of skills can be acquired in approximately ten minutes. Of course, a more aesthetically pleasing and versatile solution is to work the final product into a set of webpages: Frontpage (often installed as part of the Windows operating system) or any basic WYSIWYG editor will be sufficient to produce these.

Before sitting down to plan a webquest, it is always worth searching around on the Net to see if someone has produced something which might fit your needs. There are plenty of webquest “repositories” out on the Net, so there is little point in re-inventing the wheel. Use Google to have a good look round before you do the hard work yourself.

In the event that you DO have to design and produce your own webquest, Tom March (1997) has produced a flow chart for the design process

Essentially, the following guidelines will get you started:

  • Define the topic area and the “end product” (Introduction and Task phases)

  • Find web resources which are suitable content-wise and linguistically (Resources)

  • Group the resources according to stages of the Task

  • Structure the Process–tasks, resources, lexical areas, grammatical areas

  • Design the Evaluation stages and concepts

Once these tasks have been performed, the webquest can be put together as a simple word processed document (add images and links to all the resources learners will need) or as a webpage. Word processed files can then be hosted on a school server or Intranet whilst webpages can be uploaded to one of the free services such as Geocities, Tripod, etc.

Example webquests

Some examples from the many available webquests on the Internet:

http://www.iwebquest.com/egypt/ancientegypt.htm

Learn about Ancient Egyptian daily life, Egyptian mummies…

http://www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/China/ChinaQuest.html

What actions should the U.S. take in its policy towards China?

http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/museum/webquest.html

You and your partners have been elected as the curators of one year of The 1960’s Museum.

http://www.ardecol.ac-grenoble.fr/english/ellisislandwebquest.htm

How you would feel if you decided to leave your homeland forever?

http://www.bastrimbos.f2s.com/WebQuests/WebQuestLondon/index.htm

Have you ever been to London? This time you are going to visit London through the internet…

http://www.cssmi.qc.ca/carrefour_educatif/ressources_pedagogiques/robertt/webquests.htm

What exactly is a WebQuest? What does it feel like to do one?

http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/as/education/projects/webquests/france/france.html

Your family has decided to take a trip to France….

Further resources can be found at http://www.dudeney.com/consultants-e/resources.html

References

Benz, P. (2001). Webquests, a Constructivist Approach.http://www.ardecol.ac-grenoble.fr/english/tice/enwebquests.htm.

Dodge, B. (1995). Some Thoughts About Webquests. http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec596/about_webquests.html.

Dudeney, G. (2000). The Internet and the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.

March, T. (1997). The Webquest Design Process. http://www.ozline.com/webquests/design.html.

Marzano, R.J. (1992). A different kind of class: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R.J., Brandt, R.S., Hughes, C.S., Jones, B.F., Presseisen, B.Z., Rankin, S.C. & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

About the author

Gavin Dudeney is Head of New Technologies at International House Barcelona, Spain (www.ihes.com)  and Lead Developer for the online language school Net Languages (http://www.netlanguages.com) . Author of the Cambridge University Press title The Internet & The Language Classroom (uk.cambridge.org/elt/chlt/internet/) he also runs consultants-e, an e-learning consultancy.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.