• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

English grammar: Language as human behavior

September 2003 — Volume 7, Number 2

English grammar: Language as human behavior

Anita K. Barry, 2nd edition (2002)
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Pp. xv + 256
ISBN: 0-13-032260-1 (cloth)
$74.00

The study of English grammar has generally been a source of intellectual joy for English language educators. Regrettably, this joy has not traditionally been felt by the average person—and even by some English teachers—due to English grammar’s inherent complexity. While the study of English is, in and of itself, fraught with difficulties, more often than not, inadequate textbooks add little to students’ understanding of English grammar and frequently discourage them from further linguistic study.

Fortunately, Anita K. Barry’s English Grammar: Language as Human Behavior is available as a tool to help educators and non-educators, alike, get a better grasp of the formal aspects of English grammar. Unlike many other works, which read like reference materials rather than textbooks, Barry’s volume assumes little knowledge of English grammar outside of a reasonable level of fluency, and does not bombard students with jargon. Alternatively, she carefully explains and illustrates most grammatical terms.

While the book is quite clear in its explanations, it is also thorough, covering most essential parts of sentence-level grammar (nouns, verbs, adjective, adverbs, prepositions, and conjunctions), in addition to comparing and contrasting the various types of sentence structure (simple, complex, compound). Her presentation of these areas is traditional in that it includes prescriptive rules. However, she also shows how rules are applied by presenting them within chunks of authentic discourse. In the back of almost every chapter, for example, she includes a personal letter in which students are supposed to find the errors and correct them. Furthermore, many of the chapter discussion exercises utilize the writings of authors such as Geoffrey Chaucer, Toni Morrison, David Guterson, and columnist William Safire. Other activities feature pieces from a wide range of sources, including the Atlantic Monthly, the Dred Scott United States Supreme Court case, the Oxford English Dictionary, and the University of Michigan homepage.

Indeed, Barry discusses English grammar in both prescriptive and descriptive terms—something that only a handful of authors have done. Moreover, even before she specifically talks about grammar, she spends the first two chapters introducing students to basic linguistic concepts such as standard vs. non-standard dialects, dictionary usage, and language change. She briefly summarizes the history of rule formulation, and the concept of academic authority, as well. She then goes over the syntactic structure of English, hence giving students a small introduction to the fundamentals of universal grammar without overwhelming them with particularly thorny concepts and unnecessary terminology. Most notably, however, is that she devotes one whole chapter to explaining the discourse functions of various clause types. Among the areas she expounds upon are yes-no questions, wh-questions, tag questions, imperatives, and exclamatives.

However, what is most impressive about this text, now in its second edition, is the addition of a publisher-sponsored website that contains a summary of each chapter’s contents, in addition to multiple choice and short-answer practice questions, both of which students are able to complete independently, and have automatically corrected. There is also a message board and a chat room that put students into contact with peers from around the world who are using the text. Finally, the website reserves a separate section for teachers, which, among other things, offers suggestions regarding matters of syllabus construction and lesson planning.

While this volume is, in general, detailed and lucid, it nevertheless has a few shortcomings. First of all, the focus of most chapters is on American English, thereby potentially limiting the work’s application in other English-speaking countries. Moreover, in the preface, Barry claims that the text is primarily geared towards a one-semester course for native speakers in a university setting. In most universities, whether in the United States or abroad, courses revolving around the grammar of English are more often than not designed for teachers, whether they are native or non-native speakers. Nevertheless, Barry’s approach generally lacks an explicit pedagogical focus. More to the point, there is little discussion about how to actually teach the book’s concepts. This is problematic because even experienced teachers regularly complain of not knowing how to adequately transmit concepts to their students that they themselves can understand. Lastly, the format seems to be lacking in variety. Almost every chapter is solely comprised of explanations, examples, sentence-level exercises, discussion questions, and personal letters. While such elements are well presented and easy for both teachers and students to follow, they become repetitive and thus mirror the stereotypical grammar books that too often stifle learning and encourage negative reactions towards linguistic study.

In spite of these problems, Barry’s work would be valuable for both native and non-native speakers of English, as well as for teachers and non-teachers. In fact, the student-friendly website, combined with the text’s extensiveness and clarity, would enable a reasonably motivated student to develop a program of individualized study, regardless of their first language and professional goals. However, Barry’s emphasis on the rules, usages, and terminology of American English grammar would be particularly useful for grammar-phobic native speakers, whether they be students or professionals, who need to better their own writing. Moreover, the issues she covers frequently appear on state teacher certification exams, consequently giving the text a potential role to play in English education programs.

For EFL/ESL students who are not educators, the volume’s content appears best suited for those of an advanced level who have studied another variety of English. For such learners, it can help make them aware of dialectal differences, especially if they plan to work or study in the United States. For EFL/ESL teachers, the text offers them the opportunity to expose their students to one of the many global varieties of English. Finally, English Grammar: Language as Human Behavior offers an assessable instructional tool for teacher trainers, whether they are involved with native or non-native speakers of English. Regardless of the student population, teachers that find themselves lacking the time and/or knowledge to create their own grammar lessons and activities will find Barry’s work to be helpful. Not only is it full of practical teaching ideas, but the website also makes additional materials available. However, the ideas and materials contained in both the text and the website are still quite elemental. For that reason, they are inappropriate for graduate students in English or English-related fields.

Alex Poole
Western Kentucky University
<alex.poole@wku.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation..

[-7-]

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.