• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

The Report Writer: letters, faxes and emails (Version 4)

The Report Writer: letters, faxes and emails (Version 4)

Clarity Language Consultants Ltd.  
HK Office: PO Box 163, Sai Kung, Hong Kong.
Tel: (852) 2791-1787 Fax: (852) 2791-6484
Email: info@clarity.com.hk
Web: www.clarity.com.hk
UK Office: PO Box 625, Godalming GU7 1ZR, UK.
Tel: (44) 0845 130 5627 Fax: (44) 0845 130 5647
Email: info@clarity.com.hk
Minimum System Requirements:
Windows: 486/33MHz or higher with 8MB RAM; Windows 98/NT/2000/ME/XP (XP requires downloading and installation of a minor upgrade from the above web site); SVGA 256-color display; 3MB available hard disk space; mouse; any Windows-compatible printer.
Macintosh: no Macintosh version is available.
Network: compatible with all major network software.
Price:
1 User: US$74.00
Up to 5 Users: US$149.00
Up to 20 Users: US$374.00
Up to 40 Users: US$606.00

Introduction

The Report Writer: letters, faxes and emails (Version 4) is one CD in a series of three ‘The Report Writer’ CD-ROM titles from Clarity Language Consultants Ltd. designed to develop the writing skills of professional and business people, and Intermediate to Advanced English language learners interested in creating written documents for business communication. The program is primarily for learners to use for self-study, although a network version is also available, and much of the material may be printed out and used in the classroom. On the whole, this software’s design features are good, and it caters to some aspects of second language acquisition such as providing for learner autonomy and facilitating comprehension of semantic and syntactic aspects of input. However, it does suffer from a lack of content related to promoting interaction, providing adequate practice activities and feedback, and stimulating and motivating the user. [-1-]

Design Aspects

The Report Writer: letters, faxes and emails (Version 4) is easy to install and no other hardware or software needs to be purchased to support it. Information is clearly presented on the screen in a variety of colours: Violet indicates help notes about the text, blue indicates useful language, and black indicates example text (a colour key indicates this in the Letter Bank). Importantly, only small amounts of text are presented on each screen. Also, written work can be easily saved and printed out. The software is compatible with a range of word processors: MS Word is the standard Microsoft word processor and is the default application used by the program. If MS Word is not installed or a quicker and easier word processor is required, the program’s ‘Simple Editor’ is useful, but only font formatting is available. The ‘Other Editor’ feature allows the program to be used with other applications by using a particular file extension. Useful drop down menus are available which make navigation straightforward, and prompts are clear and concise.

Content

The Report Writer: Letters, faxes and emails (Version 4) consists of seven units focusing on the following letter types: complaints, apologies, enquiries for information, responses to an enquiry, job applications, debt collection, and giving information (e.g., change of address). Each unit has six layers of support provided (these are explained in the program’s Contents page via Help).

  1. A Letter Bank which provides a choice of five examples of model texts with help notes about each text and useful language highlighted:
  2. A Letter Guide that provides answers and advice with regard to the purpose of the letter, do’s and don’ts for the writer, examples of useful language, points to think about before and after writing, and sentence error analysis:
  3. [-2-]

  4. A Style Guide which raises and discusses questions related to various points of grammar, style, and layout accompanied by two short multiple-choice tests on one aspect of grammar and one aspect of style:
  5. A Process Guide that provides help on the writing process from the pre-writing stage through to the final draft stage:
  6. [-3-]

  7. A Writer’s Checklist that enables writers to check off each stage of the writing process as it is completed as well as note any common writing problems identified through self-evaluative comparison with model texts:
  8. A Schedule which has an interactive screen that can be used by learners to schedule their planning, writing and revising:

Other Features

The Letter Bank, Letter Guide, Style Guide, and Process Guide screens can be printed out for use in the classroom. In addition, guidance and support for learners using this software is available on the Internet via the Clarity website. Also, generic authoring software may be purchased separately. Lastly, free upgrades are provided after registration.

Overall strengths

With regard to design aspects, users do not require computer expertise, as it is easy to install and navigate around The Report Writer: letters, faxes and emails (Version 4), and there is not too much text displayed on the screen. In addition, it utilises MS Word and its myriad tools. Furthermore, all work can be easily saved and printed out, key language is presented in a variety of colours that are salient, and many of the informative screens can be printed out. Also, it does not require state-of the-art hardware or supporting software.[-4-] As for content, help is given in comprehending some semantic and syntactic aspects of input through the provision of information in the Style Guide on grammar, style, and layout. In addition, there are 35 model texts which may be referred to for guidance or self-evaluation, and the texts are authentic and culturally appropriate. The Process Guide gives a useful overview of how to approach writing a text, the Writer’s Checklist provides a focus for self-evaluation, and the Schedule screen provides learners with some sense of progress over time. Moreover, the software encourages learner autonomy by allowing each user the opportunity to start writing immediately or consider aspects such as writing strategies and style prior to writing, using their preferred approach in accordance with their goals.

Overall weaknesses

There are weaknesses in the content of The Report Writer: letters, faxes and emails (Version 4). Firstly, the learner has little assistance on what may be a useful sequence of screens to follow in the ‘six layers of support’. Greater guidance on to how best exploit this aspect of the software would be worthwhile. Secondly, little support for teachers is given on how to best utilise the network version of the software in the classroom. Next, there is no exploitation of multimedia to stimulate interaction and motivate the user. For example, aural and visual introductions, mini-presentations, pop-up questions to activate thought processes, and practice activities where learners have the opportunity to investigate and manipulate a variety of paragraphs, sentences, or phrases in order to maximize understanding are not included. Furthermore, there is little in the way of guided practice and feedback with regard to writing strategies, creating good paragraphs, and evaluating example texts. In addition, although information presented in the Style Guide is adequate, it is often contextually unclear and may not be meaningful to the user (e.g., “I was appalled to find a dead cockroach in my cake.”). Moreover, while the Letter Bank and Style Guide raise questions for the writer to consider, no guidance is given on where answers to those questions may be found. Lastly, while comparison with the model texts included does facilitate output modification of layout and some grammatical features, it is difficult for the writer to evaluate the appropriacy of the language, tone (personal/impersonal), and degree of formality used in a particular context. Until a sophisticated level of language recognition software to cope with providing this type of feedback is available, teacher and/or peer feedback will continue to be necessary with this type of program.

Jeremy Cross
British Council, Nagoya, Japan
<jeremy.cross@britishcouncil.or.jp>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

[-5-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.