• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Assessing Speaking


December 2005 – Volume 9, Number 3

Assessing Speaking

Author: Sari Luoma (2004)  
Publisher: New York: Cambridge University Press
Pages ISBN Price
Pp xiv + 272 0521804876 $32

Among the macro skills of language, it has been widely recognized that speaking, particularly in a second or foreign language, is the most difficult language skill to assess. The various directions and foci in the testing of speaking abilities of learners frequently lack solid grounding on theory and pedagogy and reliable test designs (Pennington, 1999; Celce-Murcia, Brinton, & Goodwin, 1996). This is due, for the most part, to the difficult matching of the testing goals and the appropriate instruments and tasks for assessment. Speaking as a major construct for testing is likewise divided into different criteria with highly diverse applications. The testing of pronunciation (both segmentals and suprasegmentals), spoken grammar, spoken vocabulary, and even sociolinguistic applications of speech all fall into the construct of speaking but largely require discrete test designs and measures. This is a challenge for classroom teachers and researchers of learners’ speaking abilities. Knowing what to test specifically and how to conduct the testing process require applicable theories and valid procedures that map out the direction of the assessment strategy. As a result, drawing upon applied linguistic theories on what is to be tested in speaking becomes essential for teachers and researchers. Sari Luoma’s book attempts to provide these necessary theories, concepts, and issues in the assessment of speaking.

Assessing Speaking is a part of a series of assessment in applied linguistics edited by J. Charles Alderson and Lyle F. Bachman and published by Cambridge University Press. Just like its predecessors, Luoma’s book intends to provide both classroom teachers and language researchers an adequate discussion of the issues in the assessment of learners’ language skills. Luoma’s extensive background in research on speaking in the ESL and EFL settings allows her to contextualize the presentation of topics and tasks that appeal to teachers and researchers of differing levels of competencies in the use of reliable assessment techniques in speaking. The discussion of applied linguistic theories on the nature of speaking (Chapter 2) offers interesting insights to experienced scholars and provides valuable background information to classroom teachers who want to assess their students’ ability to speak in a second or foreign language.

The book is divided into eight chapters that start with a description of the spoken language and provide summaries of applied linguistic perspectives on the assessment of speaking. Current research in test design and preparation of test tasks are reviewed (Chapter 3) and examples of rating scales used by established testing institutions (Chapter 4) are provided. At the same time, the book illustrates practical examples in the development of tasks for speaking tests (Chapters 5 through 7) and the final chapter focuses on the procedures for ensuring the validity and reliability of test designs and the overall conduct of assessment (Chapter 8). The organization of chapters and the coverage of topics and issues in the book are appropriate for its target audience. The choice of sample rating scales and test tasks in speaking are generally justified within the specific goals set forth in Luoma’s introduction and series editors’ preface.

The strength of the book relies on a considerable focus on construct validity in the assessment of speaking and a constant reminder of this concept is repeated in the discussions and chapter summaries. Luoma emphasizes the requisite need for teachers and researchers to first define the kind of speaking they want to test before they develop or adapt test tasks and rating criteria. This consideration often gets lost in classroom assessment procedures, especially when ESL/EFL teachers rely heavily on textbooks and materials that do not match the specific context of the kind of speaking intended to be assessed. For example, the testing of pronunciation is very different from the assessment of spoken grammar or the testing of speaking in meaningful interaction. However, oftentimes, similar rating scales and test tasks are used for these features in the language classrooms. Luoma suggests that because testing situations and participants vary considerably in language classrooms, it is necessary that a review of the construct validity of the testing process is conducted. She adds that examinees must be informed about what is being measured in the speaking tests and that the teachers and researchers need to make sure that the testing and rating processes follow a designed plan.

Although the book provides example tasks in the development of testing materials, classroom teachers might need more examples and detailed procedures in the application of these tasks to the assessment situation. The book offers guidelines and procedures in test development which could have been explored some more to include specific examples that could be easily adapted in the classroom or in training programs that target the development of fluency in the second language. More exhaustive sample tests that explicitly state the skill to be assessed, the tasks and procedures, rating scales or rubrics, and interpretation of results or test scores would further emphasize the importance of following a theory-based assessment process. In following this, classroom teachers will develop a heightened awareness of the components and steps of assessing speaking within their own classrooms.

The book has limited discussion of the learner in various assessment contexts. It is a relevant issue because the focus on reliability and validity of measures in speaking tests also requires proper accounting of learner factors in the acquisition of competencies in speaking a second or foreign language. Classroom teachers need to clearly control for the suitability of the measures to the proficiency level of the learners being tested in order to ensure that results are credible and generalizable to individuals in similar settings. It is important to note here that learner factors such as motivation, age, L1 background, social status, intelligence and talent, etc., have been studied in various classroom settings and have proven to contribute to the success or failure in the acquisition of effective speaking skills (Derwing & Rossiter, 2003; Dalton & Seidlhofer, 1994). Considering these factors in the assessment process, therefore, is also highly important.

Although Luoma briefly discusses inter-rater reliability (pp. 179-180), the procedures in judging performance in speaking are not thoroughly covered in the book. Teachers and researchers need to understand the difference between subjective or objective judgment in various applications and goals of the speaking tests. Moreover, credible procedures in arriving at a rating score whether the assessment calls for different raters or just one teacher are needed to be established in the test design.

Current trends in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) have provided the assessment of speaking skills newer perspectives and directions. CALL-based pronunciation training and testing are slowly being incorporated in the classroom and have evolved to include automatic computer raters and assessment procedures that could be done without the presence of a teacher (Pennington, 1999; Neri, Cucchiarini, Strik, & Boves, 2002). The role of CALL in the assessment of speaking is a pertinent field that could be added as a chapter in this book. Future applications of assessment in speaking will most likely involve CALL components in the development of tests and actual scoring of performance.

Luoma’s Assessing Speaking is an excellent starting point for teachers and researchers involved with the assessment of the different kinds of speaking skills. The book addresses important issues and provides a wealth of information that will equip the readers with sufficient grasp of the theories and concepts needed to develop tasks and rating scales in various assessment settings. The content and style of the book are presented in very clear, “down to earth” writing that will appeal to a range of audiences.

References

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: Reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, S. (1994). Pronunciation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Derwing, T.M., & Rossiter, M.J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1-18.

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441-467.

Pennington, M.C. (1999). Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 427-440.

Eric Friginal
Northern Arizona University
<eric.friginalnau.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.