• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Quick English

August 1994 — Volume 1, Number 2

Quick English

Exceller Software Corporation
2 Graham Road West
Ithaca, NY 14850 U.S.A.
TEL: (697) 257-5634; FAX: (607) 257-1665
$179 (includes a set of reproducible student worksheets)

System requirements: Macintosh LC III or higher with a minimum of 3 megabytes of RAM, System 6.07 or later, CD-ROM drive, and 13 color monitor. A Windows version will soon be available.


Quick English is a video-based multimedia program for intermediate to advanced ESL learners. Developed by LinguaTech International in cooperation with INS Corporation, Tokyo, the program provides ten lessons in conversational American English for self- study or use in language labs. Each lesson features QuickTime video segments showing native speakers participating in conversational activities such as making phone calls, buying tickets for a concert, and inviting friends to a movie.

Overview

Learners can choose to begin each lesson in one of three ways: 1) going directly from the menu screen to the dialogue screen without viewing the video; 2) viewing the entire video sequence before seeing the dialogue; 3) viewing the video sequence with branches and choosing the direction the conversation will take before seeing the dialogue.

When the learners reach the dialogue screen, there are buttons for four study options: Video Review, Grammar and Usage, Vocabulary, and Culture. By clicking on the Video Review button, learners call up a small video player in the bottom right-hand corner and simultaneously cause the entire dialogue to be segmented and highlighted. They can click on any of the highlighted segments to see and hear that portion of the dialogue, or click on the play button of the video player to hear the video from beginning to end. They can also click on a slow audio button (symbolized on the screen by a snail) to hear the audio track more carefully enunciated. Next to the slow audio button is a recording button, which allows the students to make a ten second recording. Once the recording time is over, the recorded voice will automatically be played back, followed by the corresponding video portion spoken by a native speaker.

The other three study options provide users with an opportunity to learn more about grammatical structures, idioms, and different facets of U.S. culture. For example, clicking on the Grammar and Usage Button causes the dialogue to be highlighted and the Grammar [-1-] Corner button to appear at the bottom right-hand corner of the screen. Learners can click on any of the highlights to call up a window containing a short grammar explanation and can then go to the Grammar Corner for more information.

Quick English offers three options to practice using the information in each lesson: Practice, Mastery Test, and Games. The Practice option allows the learners to answer questions written in a variety of formats. The Mastery Test presents questions randomly chosen from the practice questions but adds a timer to encourage students to work quickly. If they work too slowly, the cartoon bomb at the bottom of the screen explodes, and they have to start all over again. After finishing, students receive their raw score and percentage correct in each of the three areas. Depending on how well the students performed, the program will advise them to review the lesson by clicking on the review button on the top of the screen, or go on the something new.

The Games option includes Hangman, Matching Puzzle, and Word Jungle. The Hangman game reviews the vocabulary in each lesson by telling students that they can save the prisoner by guessing the word that is missing from the sentence. The Matching Game is similar to Concentration; students click on one square and try to find the synonym or definition in another. A match causes part of the picture beneath to be revealed. The Word Jungle is a word search game; students try to find words from the lesson going vertically, horizontally, or diagonally.

Highlights of the program

Quick English presents convincing, natural sounding dialogue used by native speakers in different situations. The lessons provide varying levels of formality in English, exposing students to the different ways Americans express themselves according to their relationship and the context. For example, in one lesson, the speakers are friends using informal English to make party plans; in another lesson, the speakers are business acquaintances conversing in a more formal way at a meeting. While the program uses scripted dialogue rather than completely authentic, unscripted conversations, the native speakers in the video speak at a natural rate of speech and make the reductions typical of American English. For students who have just arrived in the United States or are planning to to come here in the future, Quick English provides good practice in understanding the kind of English they are likely to hear and use.

Another positive feature of the program is the amount of control the program gives the students over the sequencing and pacing of their learning. Depending on their learning styles and listening comprehension skills, students can choose to begin with the video or the dialogue. Students who have weaker listening skills can also choose to hear the dialogue at a slower rate after it is [-2-] spoken at the regular speed or to hear segments repeated several times. The Vocabulary, Grammar and Usage, and Culture highlights allow students to ask for more information if they need it without forcing them to restudy something they already know. The clear navigation system makes it easy for all students, even those with minimal computer experience, to make the choices available in the program.

The games featured in Quick English are another highlight of the program. While the games in some educational software programs focus more on entertainment than learning, the games offered in Quick English allow students to review what theyve learned in an enjoyable way. The music, graphics, and sound effects in the games help keep the students interested. For example, at the end of a losing game of Hangman, the prisoner perishes in the noose of the rope, while Chopins death knell is played. The reinforcement for correct answers is also clever; at the end of a winning game, the prisoner joyfully springs into the air as the Handels Hallelujah Chorus is played.

Overall recommendation

Quick English offers students a chance to hear, analyze, and practice conversational English. It accommodates different learning styles, and allows students to explore American culture, vocabulary, and grammar in context. The program offers enough variety to keep students interested and is well worth the relatively low cost.

Pamela Couch
Boston University
<pcouch@acs.bu.edu>

[-3-]

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page in the paginated ASCII version of this article, which is the definitive edition. Please use these page numbers when citing this work.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.