• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

The Wiki Revolution: A Challenge to Traditional Education

March 2008 — Volume 11, Number 4

The Wiki Revolution: A Challenge to Traditional Education

Titles:

Homepage: http://www.wikispaces.com http://pbwiki.com/
Product type: Wiki (editable, collaborative websites)
Platform: All platforms; free software; not downloadable

Introduction

A “wiki” can be described as a piece of server software that allows users to freely create, edit, delete, and/or modify web page content using a web browser. The first wiki creator, Ward Cunningham, used the word “wiki” to describe the collaborative tool he developed. He named the site after a chain of buses in Hawaii (Wiki means “quick” in Hawaiian). In an interview, Cunningham (2003) states, “My specific purpose for the first wiki was to create an environment where we might link together each other’s experience to discover the pattern language of programming. A wiki is always in the process of being organized. But for every hour spent organizing, two more hours are spent adding new material. So the status quo for a wiki is always partially organized. ”

Wikis are people-centered tools which have no built-in hierarchy or arborescence. Wiki authors can create one very long page or as many other interlinking pages–subcategories, directories, or links–as they please. The arrangement, organization, or content can easily be undone or redone by anybody, so it can be said that a wiki is a “shared repository of knowledge with the knowledge base growing over time” (Godwin-Jones, 2003).

Despite predictions that allowing large numbers of people to edit web pages or documents would lead to chaos and misuse, wikis have managed to keep their identity as one of the most collaborative and richest tools in cyberspace. For example, Wikipedia, perhaps the best known example of a wiki, has managed to create one of the most useful repositories of knowledge anywhere by using the wiki format, the knowledge of contributors, and a minimum amount of central oversight.

In sum, a wiki is a collection of web pages which can be edited by anyone, at any time, from anywhere. Before explaining why and how language teachers can make use of such a platform, it is necessary to differentiate wikis from another commonly used type of application: weblogs, or “blogs.”

Blogs vs. Wikis

Whereas blogs have already become familiar in the pedagogical arena, wikis are just beginning to be used by EFL/ESL teachers. While both allow users to create content to be shared with other users, there are a number of differences between blogs and wikis. Table 1 below highlights the differences between the two.

Table 1. Differences between Blogs and Wikis

Blogs Wikis

  • structured
  • highly personal
  • focused on process
  • administered by one individual
  • edited by creator
  • chronologically organized

  • flexible
  • intensively collaborative
  • focused on content
  • administered by a number of people
  • edited by anyone
  • organized in innumerable ways

From Table 1, we can see that if one is mostly interested in having a one-way conversation (with perhaps some responses in a comments section), then blogs may be the way to go. However, if one is interested in creating content collaboratively with students or colleagues, then a wiki might be worth considering.

How Can Wikis Be Used?

As teachers, we can use wikis . . .

  • for instructions, manuals, glossaries
  • for a class or group project with a bibliographic format
  • for a letter or statement presented on behalf of the class
  • for a handbook or textbook to build a guide to correct punctuation
  • for any project not requiring one responsible author
  • to run a classroom, like http://epochewiki.pbwiki.com, with students collaborating online
  • to contribute to group projects with members from geographically diverse locations
  • to collaborate on ideas and organize documents and resources from individuals and groups of students
  • as a presentation tool where those who attend a workshop can contribute to future versions of the workshop
  • as a group research project for a specific idea
  • to manage school and classroom documents
  • as a collaborative handout for students
  • for writing purposes, such as student-created books and journaling (i.e., Wikibooks [http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page])
  • to create and maintain a classroom FAQ
  • as a classroom discussion and debate area
  • as a place to aggregate web resources

One recent activity using wikis involved having learners write about topics in which they were interested after engaging in “webquests” [http://webquest.org] in order to find relevant information. After posting their reports to the wiki, other users could view and edit them as necessary. Figure 1 below shows one page of this activity.

Figure 1. EFL teachers created this wiki to list webquests for upper-intermediate students

In addition to using wikis for classroom purposes, teachers can also use wikis for professional development activities. Personally, wikis have proved very effective and successful for my collaborative projects with colleagues, where all members felt an intrinsic motivation to learn and to share content knowledge together. As a CALL special interest group (SIG) coordinator in my area, I created a wiki (see Figure 2 below) that allowed members of this group to collaborate and share ideas related to CALL.

Figure 2. A pbwiki page showing all changes sorted by dates

In this wiki, the different revisions with their links can be seen clearly, sorted either by date or name, including names of postings, dates, and the possibility of deleting or renaming them. In this case, all group members with whom the author has shared the password can modify content. However, only the person who created this wiki can change the password. If the creator changes the password, he/she will make the wiki inaccessible to anyone who only has the old password, so it is important to make sure all members know about the change. Figure 2 shows how a wiki can be used to collaborate with colleagues.

Another example (Figure 3 below) of using a wiki for professional development and collaboration involved participants sharing their thoughts and work on a research project on the topic of “tagging” and language learning. Despite geographical distances and time differences, a wiki gave us the best possibility to work from our places; it helped generate activity letting all the people involved see what each one was doing. It also allowed us to provide feedback, to write and re-write, to discuss content, and come to agreements through a link to a discussion forum. In a nutshell, it allowed us to work collaboratively towards a common product.

Figure 3. EFL Teachers are running this project on writing and the use of “tagging” for language learning, at wikispaces

Not only students but also teachers working with wikis will need to acquire and develop different skills, as learners will demand assistance, prompting, and scaffolding. Students’ individual work will need to be monitored, evaluated, and, if needed, re-directed into creative, fruitful interaction in the pursuit of collective production, which will also expand and enhance teachers’ professional repertoire and experience.

Furthermore, wikis work most effectively when students can assert meaningful autonomy over the process. This is a crucial issue all teachers should remember to share with their students. Reminding them of the importance of the responsibility involved in posting as well as the responsibility in their own process of personal development is a must before plunging into any kind of online collaborative project. In fact, teachers who advocate student-centered methodologies will undoubtedly find in wikis the perfect tools for authentic, independent confluence of views towards collaborative work. In wikis, the process is the product, and the end product is the result of the group interaction.

Getting Started

If you have decided that you are interested in learning more, the next step is to take a look at some wikis. Potential users might want to browse some wiki pages at either pbwiki or at wikispaces and take a tour. Searching on Google will also yield views of different wikis on the web. Perhaps the best way to start a hands-on experience would be to visit the Wiki Wiki Web [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki/] (Figure 4), a public wiki which allows anyone to change any page or create new pages, and to experiment with how editing works. You will also find rules and tips on how to run your own wiki.

Figure 4. The Wiki Wiki Web, where users can learn through doing

There is also a good video which guides viewers through the first steps of starting a wiki at YouTube.

For readers who are ready to start their own wikis, both previously mentioned hosts, wikispaces and pbwikis, are very good choices. Both are user friendly and totally free. Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wiki_farms/ for an extremely comprehensive comparison of available wikis.

Conclusion

As Harnad (1982) states, “All advocates of constructivism agree that it is the individual’s processing of stimuli from the environment and the resulting cognitive structures, that produce adaptive behavior, rather than the stimuli themselves.” As with the advent of the constructivist approach, the emergence of wikis into the educational world poses certain imperative conditions which educators need to be conscious of to be able to shift from the traditional role which empowers their professional status to that of an “instructor” or “mediator” able to motivate learners into action by bringing up problems and dilemmas, by setting the scene, and by relinquishing their powerful position in order to allow students to gain autonomy, acquire independence, and become creative users of tools like blogs and wikis, which have become distinctive features of course management systems in the communication era we are all living.

Useful Links

  1. EduWikis [http://educationalwikis.wikispaces.com] is a very comprehensive site to bookmark and examine conscientiously. It provides ideas on how to use wikis in education, a list of articles, resources and tutorials, a comprehensive list of existing educational wikis that we can learn from, and a place to post ideas and discuss them.
  2. The online space for students of Westwood School [http://westwood.wikispaces.com] is a good example of a wiki opened by a teacher, providing links to both public and private resources for the students to use.
  3. The-Moon Wiki [http://the-moon.wikispaces.com/Introduction/] is an experiment to collect data about individual features on the lunar surface, with photos and maps.
  4. Mrs. Huff’s students’ wiki [http://huffenglish.pbwiki.com] shows how one class shares classroom content.
  5. Vicky Davis’s The Art of Using Wiki Pages to teach [http://coolcatteacher.blogspot.com/2005/12/wiki-wiki-teaching-art-of-using-wiki.html] in her blog “Cool Cat Teacher Blog” is a wonderful chronicle of her experiences.
  6. A collaborative wiki set [http://writingmatrix.wikispaces.com] by Vance Stevens has links to contributors’ personal pages and experiences.
  7. The Wiki Choice Wizard [http://www.wikimatrix.org/wizard.php] explains in simple terms the various options users usually have to think about when choosing a wiki.

References

A Conversation with Ward Cunningham. (2003, September 26). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ward_Cunningham#A_Conversation_with_Ward_Cunningham_.282003.29

Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Emerging technologies: Blogs and wikis: Environments for on-line collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 12-16. Retrieved January 11, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/emerging/

Harnad, S. (1982). Neoconstructivism: A unifying theme for the cognitive sciences. In T. Simon & R. Scholes (Eds.), Language, mind and brain. (pp. 1-11). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

About the Reviewer

Rita Zeinstejer is an EFL teacher in Argentina, with 30 years’ experience teaching English at all levels, mainly preparing students for Cambridge FCE and CAE. She is also a Cambridge Oral Examiner, and works as Area Manager for Advanced Courses, and as Self Access, Laboratory and Multimedia Coordinator at Asociación Rosarina de Cultura Inglesa. Rita has been coordinating her local CALL SIG for 6 years now, and has given many presentations on information and communication technology (ICT) and computer mediated communication (CMC) for language learning in Argentina and in Brazil. As a member of “Webheads in Action,” an online community of practice researching CMC tools for language learning, she has participated in online conferences and congresses, as well as in TESOL, IATEFL, FAAPI, and LABCI Conventions.
http://www.zeinstejer.com
email: rita@zeinstejer.com

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2025 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.