• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Language Learner Strategies: 30 Years of Research and Practice

September 2009 — Volume 13, Number 2

Language Learner Strategies: 30 Years of Research and Practice

Author: Andrew D. Cohen & Ernesto Macaro, Eds. (2007)  
Publisher: Oxford: Oxford UP
Pages ISBN Price
ISBN 970-0-19-442254-3 Pp. viii + 336 $30.50 U.S.

I still remember the first time I approached learning strategies in the mid-nineties as a PhD candidate. I discovered a new universe and I became aware of how much specialized literature was already available for me to review. I also gradually realized how deep the roots of this field were, dating back, at least, to 1975 with Rubin’s description of the good language learner.

The editors emphasize in their introduction that this volume celebrates thirty years of research on learning/language learner strategies (LLS) and show us what the path to follow in the coming future might look like. This collection is the outcome of a series of experts’ meetings held in Oxford in June 2004.

The book is divided into twelve chapters within two parts. Part I includes chapters 1-7 and provides, in general terms, a theoretical framework and discussion of issues and terminology that serve as groundwork for applying the theory, the core of part II. Chapters 8-12 review empirical research on the development of strategies linked to the four skills and acquiring vocabulary. Following the articles are the editors’ conclusions, notes on the authors, a bibliography, and an index.

Even though the book is a collection of chapters contributed by twenty-six different authors and edited by two experts, this reader felt he was reading a single block of knowledge rather than a series of isolated papers put together for publishing purposes. The editors themselves feel proud of the cohesion they sought to achieve. In their introduction, they say their book is different because of the way it was written: teamwork that translates into co-authored chapters (except for one), an anonymous peer-review process, and the adoption of systematic review guidelines that minimize subjectivity and biased interpretation of existing literature.

Chapter 1, “Claims and critiques,” is a successful revisiting of the history of strategies and their implications for the most recent approaches to language learning. Research on LLS reaches back to the late 1970s and early 1980s, when the notions of the “good language learner” and the “communicative approach” were coined almost at the same time.

Chapters 2, 3 and 4 incorporate new perspectives by offering an account of recent  research on LLS: the results of a survey initially constructed and circulated at the Oxford meeting and a literature review that focuses on individual variables.

”Research methods in strategy research: re-examining the toolbox,” the fifth chapter, focuses on using introspection or thinking-aloud protocols, no doubt the most complex procedure for  collecting LLS data. Through a review and analysis of recent studies, a number of issues have emerged about collecting research data: (a) training the study subjects to verbalize what is going on in their minds while applying strategies to solve the tasks; (b) the choice of language–L1 or L2–to report their repertoire of strategies, and (c) the variation in the selection of strategies according to the context where they are used. For all those teachers and researchers who carry out their job in a “foreign language” context—mine, for instance—the possibility of using the subjects’ L1 when collecting data correlates positively with the amount and richness of information provided by the informers.

Grammar strategies are presented in chapter 6 as the “second Cinderella,” an allusion reflecting the lack of attention that has been paid to this inventory of strategies. The concluding lines of this chapter call for further research in this direction so that a theoretical framework of grammar strategies may be developed.

The seventh chapter functions as a bridge connecting the theory outlined in Part I to the review of empirical LLS research on language skills and pivots on the relevance and need for strategy based-instruction (SBI).

Chapters 8-12 are a review of research on using strategies to acquire the four skills (listening, reading, speaking and writing) as well as learning vocabulary. A claim is made for “systematic reviewing” of research literature in place of traditional narrative reviewing. The authors argue that a fixed system avoids any chance of a reviewer’s biased interpretation and ensures comprehensibility and reliability to the review process.

These final chapters also reveal an imbalance in research work among the four language skills, with the chapter on writing in the lead position owing to the abundance of investigations carried out in the last twenty-five years on what the authors label “writing process.” The relevance of Part II comes not only from the extensive and systematic review of the research literature but from the lines of future research it opens for each of the skills; for instance, how have good listeners arrived at the stage of using a broad array of strategies, why don’t some listeners make use of prior knowledge, and what type strategy instruction should be followed to improve listening skill (pp. 184-185)?

Language Learner Strategies is atypical, in a positive way, in that some of the most valuable sections of the book are presented through a non-print source; that is, the review of research on the different skills (because of its extensiveness and format) is available as a set of appendices on the publisher’s website (http://www.oup.com). These appendices incorporate a plethora of research studies that, to tell the truth, are not easily accessible to a novice researcher and, therefore, something to be grateful for.

On the whole, the editors should feel satisfied with their achievement, not only for having orchestrated a structured and coherent book instead of a disparate collection of articles, but also for including a type of commentary not always found among researcher accounts; for example, the gratitude expressed by one of the contributors to her graduate students for the long hours spent on the internet retrieving references (p. 273) or the editors’ plea for a more fruitful relationship between researchers and practitioners that could transform research findings into better instruction and learning (p. 277).

Even though Cohen and Macaro’s book might sometimes prove dense for a newcomer to the profession, it provides a substantial agenda for future scholarly work (which, by the way, some of the newcomers might be enticed to join in). The editors’ final words are offered in the same spirit when they say that their and their contributors’ book should be envisioned more as an opening than as a point of closure.

References

Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly 9(1), 41-51.

Antonio R. Roldán Tapia
University of Córdoba, Spain
ff1rotaa@uco.es

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.