• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Listening in the Language Classroom

December 2009 — Volume 13, Number 3

Listening in the Language Classroom

Author: John Field (2008)  
Publisher: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. x + 366 978-0-521-68570-2 (paper) $35.00 US

Listening tends to be the most challenging skill for many second language learners to acquire, and it is probably the most difficult to teach successfully. Its transient, intangible nature makes it difficult to analyze and practise in the same way as other language skills. As a result, the criticism that listening is tested rather than taught in the classroom is often warranted. The difficulty for many teachers lies in finding an alternative to the ‘practice makes perfect’ comprehension approach that is generally adopted. In Listening in the Language Classroom, John Field examines these issues and proposes such alternatives, either by adapting current practice to make it more suitable to a communicative methodology, or through more radical alternatives, focusing on the process of listening.

Listening in the Language Classroom is divided into six parts. The initial background section briefly traces the history of teaching listening, leading up to current practice. This is then critically assessed, the author arguing that a comprehension based approach echoing that used in teaching L2 reading, with an emphasis on product (answering comprehension questions) rather than process is not the most constructive way of improving L2 listening skills. Field follows this up in the second section by suggesting ways of adapting the comprehension approach, such as introducing a broader range of listening types and tasks, encouraging greater learner interaction in the classroom and developing learner independence beyond it.

These first two sections are both interesting and well-argued although the material presented is not ground-breaking. More radical alternatives are presented in Part III where Field builds up his argument for a process-based methodology, going on to fully explain this process view of listening in Part IV. This is the core of the book, and overall it proposes a coherent and persuasive alternative to current practice. With the busy teacher in mind, it is also a section that can be dipped into easily, as it contains clearly marked tables of short exercises for practising specific processes. Many of these could easily be added to an existing syllabus.

Taking a process view of listening, Field discusses the importance of distinguishing between the two major operations involved in the skill, decoding and meaning-building, and of understanding the relationship between them. Decoding is concerned with “translating the speech signal into speech sounds, words and clauses, and finally into a literal meaning” (p. 125), and involves highly automatic processes, while meaning-building is defined as “adding to the bare meaning provided by decoding and relating it to what has been said before” (p. 125), involving more rational processes. Which of the two, the author asks, should we prioritize?

The ensuing discussion serves to highlight the importance of developing decoding skills which allow the input to be processed more automatically, allowing context to be used to enrich understanding of the message, rather than to compensate for gaps in understanding where decoding has failed. This points to the value of listening instruction that focuses on developing these decoding processes, particularly for novice and less skilled listeners. Further investigation into the unreliable nature of input the listener is exposed to, i.e. features of connected speech such as assimilation, elision, reduction, together with speaker variation, underline the need for focused small-scale practice in decoding samples of connected speech.

As mentioned above, the chapters in this section are interspersed with suggestions for such practice. While some of these are already widely used, such as the phoneme discrimination exercises, others are novel, such as the exercises in syllable structure and using syllable cues which reflect the importance Field places on processing syllables. For example, in ‘graded syllables’, the teacher dictates monosyllabic words representing all possible L2 syllable patterns, starting with V, CV and VC and going on to complex patterns, for example, A, ray, pray, spray, sprain, strained (p. 174). This serves to introduce learners to the range of syllable types used in the L2, and encourages familiarity with the more complex of them. There are also some interesting approaches to practising lexical segmentation, such as the awareness raising exercise in which learners are instructed to write what they hear as the teacher dictates ambiguous sequences to the learners, then adds an unexpected ending, such as a nice cream… dress [learner writes ‘an ice cream, then has to revise it] (p. 180). This exercise in particular reflects the way that decoding is presented, that is, as an operation in which tentative matches are made, matches which then may need to be revised as more input is received.

The following chapters go on to consider larger units of speech, looking at the relationship between syntax and decoding, and intonation groups and decoding, again offering examples of how this can be practised in small-scale exercises. The final chapters in this section focus on how to transfer the meaning-building processes in use in native language listening to L2 listening.

In the penultimate section of the book, the challenge of understanding spoken language in the real world is discussed. This includes a useful look at the use of authentic materials in the classroom, with an emphasis on ways of including these from the earliest stages of listening instruction. The following two chapters consider the use of compensatory strategies in gleaning the meaning of partially understood speech, and the potential value of training learners in the use of such strategies.

The book ends with a strong concluding chapter that summarizes the arguments made, and proposes a practical “multi-strand approach to L2 listening development” (p. 332). Field stresses the importance of the skill itself, reminding the reader, “Acquiring the ability to understand what L2 speakers say is not an optional extra. On the contrary; listening is the principal means by which learners expand their knowledge of spoken forms of the target language” (p. 334). Viewed from this perspective, the potential rewards from acquiring good listening skills provide justification for spending valuable classroom time on developing them.

Like most of Field’s published papers on listening, this book addresses both the theoretical and the practical in an accessible way. It is an invaluable addition to the existing literature for those involved in teacher training and syllabus design, offering both a new perspective on the importance of L2 listening, and ways of developing L2 listening in the classroom. It also has potential value as a teacher’s resource book, suggesting exercises that are short, simple and easily added to existing repertoires. However, as the book is marketed as primarily a theoretical resource, it is unlikely to reach a broad audience directly. Nevertheless, if the shift in perspective regarding L2 listening instruction the author aims for occurs, we can hope to see a process approach to listening integrated into teacher training courses, published materials and consequently into current practice at a broader level.

Rachel Allan
Applied Language Centre, University College Dublin, Ireland
Rachel_Allanalc.ucd.ie

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.