• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Procedures
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • APA Style Guide
  • TESL-EJ Editorial Board

Word Knowledge: A Vocabulary Teacher’s Handbook

March 2010 — Volume 13, Number 4

Word Knowledge: A Vocabulary Teacher’s Handbook

Author: Cheryl Boyd Zimmerman (2008)  
Publisher: New York: Oxford University Press
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. vi + 154 ISBN 978-0-19-470393-2 (paperback) $21.50 U.S.

With the clarity of its exposition, the breadth of its field of reference, and the wealth of practical applications it presents Word Knowledge: A Vocabulary Teacher’s Handbook is a valuable resource for all those involved in the complex task of teaching vocabulary. Recognizing that for all language users, including the most proficient, it may be claimed that “we don’t just ‘know’ or ‘not know’ a word; we are always at varying stages of knowledge for each word we are learning” (p. 116), Word Knowledge seeks to address the vocabulary learning needs of both teachers and their learners.

Key concepts which together form the theoretical underpinning of Word Knowledge are “word consciousness” (pp. 3-5) and “layers of word knowledge” (pp. 5-6). The concept of “word consciousness” derives from the work of Scott and Nagy (2004) among others, and is defined by Zimmermann as “an awareness and appreciation of words and the ability to reflect on their use” (p. 3). The concept of “layers of word knowledge” relates to the widely held view that “to know a word means to know a great deal about it” (p. 5), an idea credited to Nation (1990, 2001). Together these twin concepts provide the organizing principle of Word Knowledge:

The premise of this book is that word consciousness is a critical skill to develop, first for vocabulary teachers, and then for their students. It will enable learners to improve their use of words by making insightful observations about words in authentic use. A key aspect of word consciousness is acknowledging the extensiveness of what it means to know a word. That is, word consciousness includes a growing understanding of the many layers of word knowledge. (p. 5)

Word Knowledge: A Vocabulary Teacher’s Handbook contains seven chapters. The first chapter introduces the key concepts of “word consciousness” and “layers of word knowledge”. It then presents “key considerations for the classroom”, advising teachers to be selective in the words they target for instruction and the information they present about these words, to provide opportunities for adequate repetition and effective practice of vocabulary items, and to monitor their students’ understanding. Thereafter each of the following five chapters focuses on a particular “layer of word knowledge”: meaning; collocation; grammatical features; word parts; register and other language variation. The concluding chapter provides suggestions as to how to help students become independent word learners. Each of the seven chapters of Word Knowledge is accompanied by a set of notes, which provide details of works cited in the text and of additional sources of information. The book also contains a list of references, an answer key for the classroom activities, and an index.

The clarity of the chapter format in Word Knowledge helps readers to find their bearings quickly within the landscape of the book. Each chapter is divided into four main sections: background; a closer look at the particular topic under investigation; key considerations for the classroom; suggested classroom activities. Each of these sections is further broken down into numbered and headed sub-sections. Thus in Chapter Two, entitled “Working With Meaning”, the section “A closer look at meaning” discusses meaning under headings such as: “definitions and word learning”, “connotation and shades of meaning”, and “multiple meanings”. The following section, “Key considerations for the classroom”, then considers in separate sub-sections how teachers can effectively deal with definitions, help learners talk about meaning, and pay due attention to the learning burden posed by meaning.

The clear and accessible structure of each chapter of Word Knowledge is an attractive feature of the book. Moreover, since each of the sections and subsections can be understood in its own right, without necessary reference to what has gone before, Word Knowledge can be put to flexible and varied use, to suit an individual teacher’s preferences and circumstances. Thus teachers with adequate time at their disposal might profitably read the entire book from cover to cover, and thereby form an overall picture of the issues involved in vocabulary learning and teaching. On the other hand teachers short of preparation time can dive in and try out particular classroom activities straightaway, reading only those sections of the book directly related to their chosen activities. Indeed page references to relevant preceding chapter sections are provided within many of the classroom activities to enable readers to use the book in just this way.

Word Knowledge provides a succinct and wide-ranging account of the literature related to vocabulary learning. Throughout the book frequent reference is made to current research on vocabulary learning, as well as to practical handbooks for vocabulary teachers, among many other sources. When referring to the recent literature the book surveys traditional academic sources such as books and articles, but also pays considerable attention to sources of information on and tools relating to vocabulary that are available through the new media, including concordancers (p. 48), online dictionaries (p. 101), and academic websites such as one relating to Coxhead’s (2000) New Academic Word List (p. 8).

Word Knowledge: A Vocabulary Teacher’s Handbook sets out “to help tease apart the complex process of vocabulary learning and teaching and to provide ideas for addressing learners’ needs” (p. v), and it fulfills this aim admirably. There are only a few minor ways in which I feel this excellent handbook could be improved, each of which relates to the “activities” sections of the chapters. Firstly, some indication as to the proficiency level (beginner, intermediate, advanced etc.) for which the various activities are intended might usefully have been provided. Secondly, in the suggested classroom procedures for the activities there is perhaps a certain overuse of working “in pairs or small groups” followed up by “class discussion”. For example, in Chapter Seven every one of the suggested activities follows this methodological procedure. Moreover class discussion, in particular, can be quite difficult to manage successfully, especially in situations where class sizes are large.

These, though, are minor quibbles, and I have found Word Knowledge to be a valuable source of ideas for my own teaching and research. With regard to teaching, for several years I assigned an individual vocabulary enrichment project as one component of the coursework for a language development course taken by students majoring in ESL education. The results of this assignment, however, were often disappointing, and, though I encouraged the students to record their vocabulary in creative ways, very often the projects presented for assessment consisted of a simple list of words hastily memorized at the last moment. If I taught this kind of course again I would put the insights gained and activities learnt from my reading of Word Knowledge, and in particular of the chapter entitled “Helping Students Become Independent Word Learners”, into practice, and I would be sure to obtain better results from this type of assignment.

In addition, the extensive coverage of vocabulary-related literature in Word Knowledge has also provided new pointers for my research into the vocabulary knowledge of students at the University of Brunei Darussalam. My colleague and I have been trying to understand why students’ vocabulary does not appear to increase much over the first two years of their university studies, according to tests of productive vocabulary knowledge. Through Word Knowledge we have become acquainted with Batia Laufer’s (1991) ‘active vocabulary threshold hypothesis’, and this promises to lead to a fruitful new line of inquiry.

References

Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly 34(2), 213-238.

Laufer, B. (1991). The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learner. The Modern Language Journal 75(4), 440-448.

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scott, J. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2004). Developing word consciousness. In J. F. Baumann & E. J. Kame’enui (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (pp. 201-217). New York: Guilford Press.

Ann Gillian Elgar
University of Brunei Darussalam
<annelgar gmail.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2023 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.